How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199:2834]

[haymarket]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

Please do not worry your pretty little head about my reading comprehension skills..

Flattery will get you nowhere.
Of course, your post also gets you nowhere.

 

[Federalist]

How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

Flattery will get you nowhere.
Of course, your post also gets you nowhere.

The constitution is loud and clear.

The right to keep and bear what?

The right to keep and bear arms.

What, specifically?

Arms.

 

[haymarket]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

The constitution is loud and clear.

The right to keep and bear what?

The right to keep and bear arms.

What, specifically?

Arms.

I got two of em.

 

[Federalist]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

I got two of em.

I will accept your inane comment as an acknowledgement that I am right.

I accept your surrender.

 

[TurtleDude]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

You be sure to let us all know when that happens.

why are you afraid to answer such an honest question? Law students are asked this all the time-use existing case law and discuss how the USSC would rule if another fact pattern came before them

are you unable to apply HELLER to the "assault weapons"

or do you not want to say

 

[Lukas105]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

People have always believe in these rights. Look at the battles of Lexington and Concord for example. When the British marched out of Boston to go destroy/confiscate American militia weapons and supplies, the militia grabbed their rifles and fought back, instead of backing down. There was no "bill of rights" defending their actions, rather, they all acted in the same liberty that holds up the purpose of the Second Amendment.

I ask you where these rights come from and you give me written statements about the rights. Are you saying that these rights come from these written statements?

 

[haymarket]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

I will accept your inane comment as an acknowledgement that I am right.

I accept your surrender.

YOu would get further accepting a bag of garden manure.

 

[haymarket]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

why are you afraid to answer such an honest question? Law students are asked this all the time-use existing case law and discuss how the USSC would rule if another fact pattern came before them

are you unable to apply HELLER to the "assault weapons"

or do you not want to say

When I get to be a law student - you will be the 49th to know about it. Until then - don't wait up .

 

[haymarket]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

People have always believe in these rights. Look at the battles of Lexington and Concord for example. When the British marched out of Boston to go destroy/confiscate American militia weapons and supplies, the militia grabbed their rifles and fought back, instead of backing down. There was no "bill of rights" defending their actions, rather, they all acted in the same liberty that holds up the purpose of the Second Amendment.

Lots of folks also believe in spiritual beings ruling the universe also. And you cannot prove those either.

 

[TurtleDude]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

When I get to be a law student - you will be the 49th to know about it. Until then - don't wait up .

My high school teacher would do the same thing. we actually learned about constitutional law. Are you afraid to proffer an opinion on what the court ought to do on hot button issues?

 

[TurtleDude]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

Lots of folks also believe in spiritual beings ruling the universe also. And you cannot prove those either.

that is a major fail since the Bill of Rights incorporated Natural Rights into the law of the land

 

[haymarket]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

My high school teacher would do the same thing. we actually learned about constitutional law. Are you afraid to proffer an opinion on what the court ought to do on hot button issues?

Call your high school teacher. Tell him his former student never learned the fundamentals of debate.

 

[haymarket]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

that is a major fail since the Bill of Rights incorporated Natural Rights into the law of the land

Have you so soon forgotten about the billionaire building the Faerie Kingdom castle? :lamo:mrgreen::lamo

You cannot incorporate something which does not exist into something which is real and validate the existence of that which did not exist in the first place.

 

[Federalist]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

YOu would get further accepting a bag of garden manure.

You're adorable.

 

[TurtleDude]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

Call your high school teacher. Tell him his former student never learned the fundamentals of debate.

This isn't about some third rate college debate club. This is about discussing the second amendment and how the supreme court would apply it to other gun laws that have yet to come before it. I believe that if Heller is followed, California Assault weapon bans will be struck down

You apparently are unwilling to discuss this but instead want to hide behind the fact that the law is not currently before the court. So tell us, why do you refuse to discuss what the Court may do?

 

[Federalist]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

YOu would get further accepting a bag of garden manure.

"the right of the people to keep and bear arms"

what do the people have a right to keep and bear?

arms

If something is an arm, do the people have a right to keep and bear it?

yes

You're welcome.

 

[cpgrad08]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

"the right of the people to keep and bear arms"

what do the people have a right to keep and bear?

arms

If something is an arm, do the people have a right to keep and bear it?

yes

Your talking to a wall Federalist.

 

[TurtleDude]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

Have you so soon forgotten about the billionaire building the Faerie Kingdom castle? :lamo:mrgreen::lamo

You cannot incorporate something which does not exist into something which is real and validate the existence of that which did not exist in the first place.

that is really stupid==natural rights are a theory. The bill of rights has adopted that theory and made it the law of the land

its like saying "nobility" does not exist but if the laws of England give title and privileges to Royals, then it surely exists

You despise natural law because it is a bulwark against statist collectivism

 

[Federalist]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

My high school teacher would do the same thing. we actually learned about constitutional law. Are you afraid to proffer an opinion on what the court ought to do on hot button issues?

Of course he is, because he has no constitutional justification for his position.

 

[haymarket]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

This isn't about some third rate college debate club. This is about discussing the second amendment and how the supreme court would apply it to other gun laws that have yet to come before it. I believe that if Heller is followed, California Assault weapon bans will be struck down

OOOH OOOH OOOH - can't we discuss what would have happened if Olive Oyl had been in Smallville and got laid by Clark Kent and then had a baby with super powers who became a Star Fleet Commander?

Can we can we can we can we?????

 

[TurtleDude]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

OOOH OOOH OOOH - can't we discuss what would have happened if Olive Oyl had been in Smallville and got laid by Clark Kent and then had baby with super powers who became a Star Fleet Commander?

Can we can we can we can we?????

for a guy who talks about the "rules" of debate all the time you sure don't seem all that interested in the topic here. why are you so afraid to discuss what the USSC should do to other gun control laws after their ruling in Heller?

rather than discuss this honest and legitimate topic, you spend hours posting evasive nonsense that is nothing more than diversion and a waste of time

 

[haymarket]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

for a guy who talks about the "rules" of debate all the time you sure don't seem all that interested in the topic here. why are you so afraid to discuss what the USSC should do to other gun control laws after their ruling in Heller?

rather than discuss this honest and legitimate topic, you spend hours posting evasive nonsense that is nothing more than diversion and a waste of time

Are you incapable of a hypothetical discussion? How about the Olive Oyl hypothesis?

 

[Federalist]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

Are you incapable of a hypothetical discussion? How about the Olive Oyl hypothesis?

This is what you're resorting to?

You are so completely destroyed. It warms the cockles of my heart.

You're adorable.

 

[haymarket]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

This is what you're resorting to?

You are so completely destroyed. It warms the cockles of my heart.

You're adorable.

My hypothetical has the current same standing before the Court as Turtles does. Hope that thrills your cockles. :roll:

 

[TurtleDude]

Re: How Do YOU Interpret The 2nd Amendment? [W:199]

My hypothetical has the current same standing before the Court as Turtles does. Hope that thrills your cockles. :roll:

IN other words you are unwilling to discuss the issue. Then why are you on this thread?