How Coke Evolved From a Rock...

[Exquisitor]

"Billions of years ago, a big bang produced a large rock. As the rock cooled, sweet brown liquid formed on its surface. As time passed, aluminum formed itself into a can, a lid and a tab. Millions of years later, red and white paint fell from the sky, and formed itself into the words 'Coca Cola…12 fluid ounces.'”(1)

Of course, this is absurd. No one believes Coke evolved from a rock. Yet most people believe that the far more complex plants, animals, and humans evolved without planning or Planner.

To believe in a chance beginning to the universe, we need to ignore the obvious.

“For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” Romans 1:20

In order to deny the truth of creation, "scoffers" have developed the sophisticated but foolish theories of evolution (2 Peter 3:3-5; 1 Corinithians 1:20).

If someone makes you feel stupid because you don’t agree with them about evolution, rest in God’s wisdom and take a glance out the window at the ubiquitous* proof for INTELLIGENT design.
https://biblelovenotes.blogspot.com/2012/09/coke-evolved-from-rock.html

Why Elora!

Get a glass pipe and some brillo.

Don't get led paint in your coke.

All the way there? Whatever takes to there.

Creation is a marriage of chance and predetermination and free will.

 

[SMTA]

So you still can't debunk my theory, and insult me?


That's the lefts only defense, spelling, grammar and insults, attack the messenger not the message

Bye bye Big Steve

 

[Grand Mal]

"Billions of years ago, a big bang produced a large rock. As the rock cooled, sweet brown liquid formed on its surface. As time passed, aluminum formed itself into a can, a lid and a tab. Millions of years later, red and white paint fell from the sky, and formed itself into the words 'Coca Cola…12 fluid ounces.'”(1)

Of course, this is absurd. No one believes Coke evolved from a rock. Yet most people believe that the far more complex plants, animals, and humans evolved without planning or Planner.

To believe in a chance beginning to the universe, we need to ignore the obvious.

“For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” Romans 1:20

In order to deny the truth of creation, "scoffers" have developed the sophisticated but foolish theories of evolution (2 Peter 3:3-5; 1 Corinithians 1:20).

If someone makes you feel stupid because you don’t agree with them about evolution, rest in God’s wisdom and take a glance out the window at the ubiquitous* proof for INTELLIGENT design.
https://biblelovenotes.blogspot.com/2012/09/coke-evolved-from-rock.html

Why do whales have lungs and finger bones? Is that evolution or intelligent design?

 

[Gordy327]

Of course it's absurd...about as absurd as believing in evolution...

One doesn't or shouldn't believe in evolution. Evolution has supporting empirical evidence, which is accepted or discredited. Belief is not needed or required.

 

[CaughtInThe]

the only people i don't listen to are the people that are 100% sure of what happened a gazillion years ago.

 

[Lloyd Christmas]

Oh my god, what a completely moronic post from the religion spammer. Holy shit, your god is embarrassed for you

 

[HennyBogan]

"Billions of years ago, a big bang produced a large rock. As the rock cooled, sweet brown liquid formed on its surface. As time passed, aluminum formed itself into a can, a lid and a tab. Millions of years later, red and white paint fell from the sky, and formed itself into the words 'Coca Cola…12 fluid ounces.'”(1)

Of course, this is absurd. No one believes Coke evolved from a rock. Yet most people believe that the far more complex plants, animals, and humans evolved without planning or Planner.

To believe in a chance beginning to the universe, we need to ignore the obvious.

“For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” Romans 1:20

In order to deny the truth of creation, "scoffers" have developed the sophisticated but foolish theories of evolution (2 Peter 3:3-5; 1 Corinithians 1:20).

If someone makes you feel stupid because you don’t agree with them about evolution, rest in God’s wisdom and take a glance out the window at the ubiquitous* proof for INTELLIGENT design.
https://biblelovenotes.blogspot.com/2012/09/coke-evolved-from-rock.html

Disappointed, where is the cocaine? Let’s buzz Hunter

 

[911Sparky]

"Billions of years ago, a big bang produced a large rock. As the rock cooled, sweet brown liquid formed on its surface. As time passed, aluminum formed itself into a can, a lid and a tab. Millions of years later, red and white paint fell from the sky, and formed itself into the words 'Coca Cola…12 fluid ounces.'”(1)

This is really no more ridiculous than the idea that a talking snake changed the course of the world.

Of course, this is absurd. No one believes Coke evolved from a rock. Yet most people believe that the far more complex plants, animals, and humans evolved without planning or Planner.

To believe in a chance beginning to the universe, we need to ignore the obvious.

“For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” Romans 1:20

In order to deny the truth of creation, "scoffers" have developed the sophisticated but foolish theories of evolution (2 Peter 3:3-5; 1 Corinithians 1:20).

If someone makes you feel stupid because you don’t agree with them about evolution, rest in God’s wisdom and take a glance out the window at the ubiquitous* proof for INTELLIGENT design.
https://biblelovenotes.blogspot.com/2012/09/coke-evolved-from-rock.html

 

[Daisy]

 

[Dragonfly]

 

[Questerr]

No scientist claims “a reptile evolved into a mammal”. You are lying about Evolution.

Since you are unapologetically bearing false witness, that makes you a “Fake Christian” doesn’t it?

 

[Daisy]

No scientist claims “a reptile evolved into a mammal”. You are lying about Evolution.

Since you are unapologetically bearing false witness, that makes you a “Fake Christian” doesn’t it?

That is not what it says...so who's lying now? You...but since you brought it up...

Mammals were derived in the Triassic Period (about 252 million to 201 million years ago) from members of the reptilian order Therapsida. The therapsids, members of the subclass Synapsida (sometimes called the mammal-like reptiles), generally were unimpressive in relation to other reptiles of their time. Synapsids were present in the Carboniferous Period (about 359 million to 299 million years ago) and are one of the earliest known reptilian groups. They were the dominant reptiles of the Permian Period (299 million to 252 million years ago), and, although they were primarily predaceous in habit, the adaptive radiation included herbivorous species as well. In the Mesozoic Era (about 252 million to 66 million years ago), the most important of the synapsids were the archosaurs, or “ruling reptiles,” and the therapsids were, in general, small active carnivores. Therapsids tended to evolve a specialized heterodont dentition (that is, a set of teeth separated into molars, incisors, and canines) and to improve the mechanics of locomotion by bringing the plane of action of the limbs close to the trunk. A secondary palate was developed, and the temporal musculature, the muscle involved in closing the jaw, was expanded.
https://www.britannica.com/animal/mammal/Evolution-and-classification

 

[Questerr]

That is not what it says...so who's lying now? You...

“No one has watched a reptile evolve into a mammal”

No scientist claims that ever did occur or even that it should. Your graphic is lying about what evolution says.

Are you going to admit your graphic is lying or are you going o double down on hearing false witness as a Fake Christian would?

 

[Daisy]

“No one has watched a reptile evolve into a mammal”

No scientist claims that ever did occur or even that it should. Your graphic is lying about what evolution says.

Are you going to admit your graphic is lying or are you going o double down on hearing false witness as a Fake Christian would?

lol...read the edit...

 

[Questerr]

That is not what it says...so who's lying now? You...but since you brought it up...

Mammals were derived in the Triassic Period (about 252 million to 201 million years ago) from members of the reptilian order Therapsida. The therapsids, members of the subclass Synapsida (sometimes called the mammal-like reptiles), generally were unimpressive in relation to other reptiles of their time. Synapsids were present in the Carboniferous Period (about 359 million to 299 million years ago) and are one of the earliest known reptilian groups. They were the dominant reptiles of the Permian Period (299 million to 252 million years ago), and, although they were primarily predaceous in habit, the adaptive radiation included herbivorous species as well. In the Mesozoic Era (about 252 million to 66 million years ago), the most important of the synapsids were the archosaurs, or “ruling reptiles,” and the therapsids were, in general, small active carnivores. Therapsids tended to evolve a specialized heterodont dentition (that is, a set of teeth separated into molars, incisors, and canines) and to improve the mechanics of locomotion by bringing the plane of action of the limbs close to the trunk. A secondary palate was developed, and the temporal musculature, the muscle involved in closing the jaw, was expanded.



https://www.britannica.com/animal/mammal/Evolution-and-classification

At no point did something that was a reptile give birth to something that was a mammal. You don’t understand evolution and you are actively lying about it.

Which is why you posted a link to an encyclopedia article meant for pop culture consumption instead of an actual peer reviewed scientific paper.

Furthermore, the very mention of “kind” in your graphic shows how you fail to understand evolution and desire to lie about it instead. “Kind” means nothing in science and Creationists constantly arbitrarily redefine to the term to mean whatever is convenient for them at the time.

 

[Daisy]

At no point did something that was a reptile give birth to something that was a mammal. You don’t understand evolution and you are actively lying about it.

Which is why you posted a link to an encyclopedia article meant for pop culture consumption instead of an actual peer reviewed scientific paper.

Furthermore, the very mention of “kind” in your graphic shows how you fail to understand evolution and desire to lie about it instead. “Kind” means nothing in science and Creationists constantly arbitrarily redefine to the term to mean whatever is convenient for them at the time.

Yeah, I know you are...

 

[Gordy327]

No scientist claims “a reptile evolved into a mammal”. You are lying about Evolution.

Or at the very least, profoundly ignorant about evolution.

 

[Questerr]

Yeah, I know you are...

You sound just like the Fake Christians you rail against. When you don’t end up in paradise because you unapologetically bore false witness, will you blame yourself or get angry with your god?

 

[Daisy]

The several features that separate modern reptiles from modern mammals doubtless evolved at different rates. Many attributes of mammals are correlated with their highly active habit—for example, efficient double circulation with a completely four-chambered heart, anucleate and biconcave erythrocytes, the diaphragm, and the secondary palate (which separates passages for food and air and allows breathing during mastication or suckling). Hair for insulation is a correlate of endothermy, or warm-bloodedness, the physiological maintenance of individual temperature independent of environmental temperature. Endothermy allows high levels of sustained activity. The unique characteristics of mammals thus would seem to have evolved as a complex interrelated system.
https://www.britannica.com/animal/mammal/Evolution-and-classification

 

[Gordy327]

Yeah, I know you are...

What a Pee Wee Herman response. You only prove Questerr right!

 

[Questerr]

The several features that separate modern reptiles from modern mammals doubtless evolved at different rates. Many attributes of mammals are correlated with their highly active habit—for example, efficient double circulation with a completely four-chambered heart, anucleate and biconcave erythrocytes, the diaphragm, and the secondary palate (which separates passages for food and air and allows breathing during mastication or suckling). Hair for insulation is a correlate of endothermy, or warm-bloodedness, the physiological maintenance of individual temperature independent of environmental temperature. Endothermy allows high levels of sustained activity. The unique characteristics of mammals thus would seem to have evolved as a complex interrelated system.
https://www.britannica.com/animal/mammal/Evolution-and-classification

Continuing to link to pop science from an encyclopedia (intended for extreme laymen to understand) rather than actual peer-reviewed science. Your intention to lie could not be more clear.

At no point does science claim that a reptile gave birth to a mammal. You don’t know what you are talking about and rather than educate yourself, you double down on spreading falsehoods.

 

[Daisy]

Mammals evolved from a group of reptiles called the synapsids. These reptiles arose during the Pennsylvanian Period (310 to 275 million years ago). A branch of the synapsids called the therapsids appeared by the middle of the Permian Period (275 to 225 million years ago). It was over millions of years that some of these therapsids would evolve many features that would later be associated with mammals.

It's impossible to know from which of the reptiles the first mammals evolved. The hallmarks of today's mammals - hair, warm blood and milk-producing glands - do not fossilize. We know that some dinosaurs, such as the Stegosaurus and Dimetrodon, supported large plates or sails of skin, developed to function as solar panels, absorbing the sun's heat for quick mobilization. However, during the period of dinosaurs, some of the sail-backed pelycosaurs (which includes the Dimetrodon) lost their sails. Even acknowledging a warming period ensued, it would be improbable that such an effective heating mechanism would be lost through evolution unless a more efficient method of heat control had evolved to replace it. It is therefore reasonable to supposed that the pelycosaurs and their successors, the therapsids, were to some degree endothermic. The therapsids, being only three feet long, would need some form of body insulation if it was to be effective. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that some of these creatures were covered in hair, or fur.
http://www.bobpickett.org/evolution_of_mammals.htm

 

[Daisy]

At no point does science claim that a reptile gave birth to a mammal. You don’t know what you are talking about and rather than educate yourself, you double down on spreading falsehoods.

Evidently it is you who does not understand the meaning of evolution...lol...

 

[Questerr]

Evidently it is you who does not understand the meaning of evolution...lol...

Of course I do, which is why I understand the concept of transitional species.

But you are ignorant enough to claim evolution hasn’t happened when scientists have directly observed it multiple times.

 

[Gordy327]

Evidently it is you who does not understand the meaning of evolution...lol...

That's hilarious coming from you!