No matter. It did not meet the definition of High Crimes and Misdemeanors. An offense that any common citizen can commit is not a High Crime or misdemeanor. it is not a crime of high office. So sorry but NO!He probably shouldn't of done it in the White House.
I'm not bothered in the least, beyond pointing out the claim was a lie. And the poster knew it was a lie which is why he omitted the rest of the quote.I would not bother myself about this bit of Rightie nonsense
Tantrum noted and appreciated. The toothpaste is out of the tube. Americans know that Joe Biden intentionally got people to flood the border in hopes of overwhelming our Border Patrol people.Why would you post this lie? That is not what Joe Biden said. And you know this, which is why you didn't post the full quote:
"This is a president who came along with the DACA program, no one had done that. Sent legislation to the desk, a pathway for the 11 million undocumented in America. This is a president that's done a great deal. I'm proud to have served with him. What I would do as president is several more things, because things have changed. I would, in fact, make sure that there is, we immediately surge to the border, all those people who are seeking asylum. They deserve to be heard. That’s who we are. We’re a nation that says, ‘If you want to flee and you’re fleeing oppression, you should come."
You don't like the truth, so you pretend that Biden's intentions were not for nefarious purposes. They were. And Americans know it. This impeachment process might run out of steam, but the awareness of Biden's incompetence will not.So, again...why would you just blatantly post a lie like that?
Last night I was exposed to a re-broadcast of Hannity's earlier June 20, 2023 radio program. His guest was John Solomon,
They proceeded to misinform listeners about the performance of John Durham and the criminality of Clinton and the FBI and victimization of
Trump emphasized again in Durham's House committee testimony, yesterday.
The two looked forward to an appearance by Comer's whistleblower today, presenting evidence and testimony of Biden family criminality.
It was as if neither man was discredited and Murdoch hadn't been forced to pay an $800 million settlement.
So the brainwashing is self administered, you expose yourselves exclusively to sources that feed you shit instead of news reporting.
"...Access to Trump presidential records
On June 19, 2022, Donald Trump sent a letter to the National Archives naming Solomon and Kash Patel as "representatives for access to Presidential records of my administration""
Does FBI Have Evidence That Joe Biden Received $5M Bribe from Burisma Exec?
Snopes.com on MSN.com|3 hours ago
"GOP investigators and Rudy Giuliani have both claimed to know the identity of a whistleblower with information on an alleged bribe to the Bidens.
...In this article, Snopes untangles these confused claims while demonstrating that none of the claims in any way is consistent or new."
Have you ever done anything illegal?We seperate families everyday. For Drunk driving, drug related, making drugs ect. Crimes in which adults do something illegal.
I have no idea, but I'm assuming it's utter bullshit considering who was supporting it.Anyone here know what he is specifically being impeached for?
Has Sonny Hostin weighed in yet?You are absolutely right.
This impeachment has nothing to do with the (alleged) bribes that Joe Biden took for political favors - this impeachment is about his disastrous immigration/border security policies. . . . which IS substantiated by the record levels of human trafficking and the deaths related to fentanyl poisoning. These are directly linked to a dereliction of duty, to uphold the Law, and a blatant (and deliberate) failure to faithfully execute the office to which he has been entrusted.
Forget about the $5 Million bribe money. Biden is going DOWN.
WTH?
Nothing in this?
It just says "for high crimes and misdemeanors"
So it's all about the bullshit claim of open borders?This resolution that was passed refers to committees the resolution (H. Res. 503) outlining the alleged reasons to impeach Biden.
^^^^ more mindless hate, projection, lies and BDS. Typical low IQ nonsense.A legitimate impeachment?
He should have never been president. Stolen election. Illegitimate.
Democrats are fuming and projecting again.
The media and big tech are in control.
FalseA legitimate impeachment?
He should have never been president. Stolen election. Illegitimate.
NoDemocrats are fuming and projecting again.
More like the media conglomerates, whose staff work with their friends the lobbyists and politicians.The media and big tech are in control.
So it's all about the bullshit claim of open borders?
Roll Call 285 Roll Call 285, Bill Number: H. Res. 529, 118th Congress, 1st Session
VOTE QUESTION: On Agreeing to the Resolution, DESCRIPTION: Relating to the resolution (H. Res. 503) impeaching Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors, VOTE TYPE: Recorded Vote, STATUS: Passedclerk.house.gov
219 to 208
Exactly what are these "high crimes and misdemeanors?"
I know we aren’t as common sense oriented as we use to be. Certainly not as practical as our Greatest Generation.
Hopefully we smarten up and realize our tools, especially our houses of representation, that we use to govern ourselves are not another reality tv show. It’s not for entertainment. It’s serious business and we must insist it be run like something serious.
He might have sent Eemails with it!He had a laptop, I heard.
C'mon ... it's the same clash of civilizations, democratic vs. less democratic.I know we aren’t as common sense oriented as we use to be. Certainly not as practical as our Greatest Generation.
Hopefully we smarten up and realize our tools, especially our houses of representation, that we use to govern ourselves are not another reality tv show. It’s not for entertainment. It’s serious business and we must insist it be run like something serious.
You have the wrong investigation. It is US attorney Weiss in Delaware's case which was held up for 5 years.Five-year investigation you say? How long is that statute of limitations and why did Durham eat up five years of it?
Thanks for the correction.You have the wrong investigation. It is US attorney Weiss in Delaware's case which was held up for 5 years.
See #93 in an thread which discusses this.
This is nothing more than revenge for youknowwho's impeachments (which were justified)
What a sham
No problem.Thanks for the correction.
There are so many GOP investigations that lasted years and came up empty I sometimes confuse them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?