House panel officially clears Trump in Russia probe

[biff_poindexter]

I doubt that this will stop people (the Trump haters) from continuing on with the charge even though it is now moot.

"the Republican-led House intelligence committee on Friday officially declared the end of its Russia probe, saying in its final report that it found no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia in the 2016 presidential campaign."

Many sources on this, most short, this is one.

GOP-led House panel officially clears Trump in Russia probe - Chicago Tribune

Now hopefully this Russia investigation can all come to an end -- and Trump can focus on his policies and making America great again. I would really like to hear him tout what he is doing with HUD more -- raising the rent on those moochers is a brilliant idea. Ben Carson was the perfect choice.

 

[biff_poindexter]

"Morons that believe there was collusion without ever having been presented evidence of collusion still cling to collusion while ignoring the DNCs obvious collusion"

And to be clear, we have tons of evidence that Hillary, Obama and the DNC colluded with Russia -- if it wasn't for that liberal plant Jeff Sessions, these people would be in jail by now. Time for trump to fire sessions and put a guy in there who will do what Trump tells him to do.


However, this may all be for nothing because I do remember many Trump lovers saying "even if Trump did do it, collusion isn't illegal"

 

[Born Free]

And would you accept Mueller's official conclusion if he determines that Trump is guilty of crimes?

Glad to answer after you answer my question. Answering my question with a question is not how it works. Thank you.

 

[Floridafan]

You answer my question with a question, I'll respond when you answer.

Personally I doubt very much that Mueller will clear him. He has been involved in too many shaky deals (IMO)

 

[biff_poindexter]

No...a statement of fact. Mindless leftist morons were convicned of Russian collusion without a shred of evidence since before the election. There has been House GOP and Democrats investigating collusion. The FBI investigated collusion for going on...what...30 months now? There has been a special counsel investigation ongoing. And those same mindless leftist retards cling to their same beliefs and do so regardless of fact.

And thats simply the truth...and you know it.

Exactly, its been almost 2 years now, that's the longest investigation in history(if you don't count a lot of other investigations) and there is no collusion. However, Benghazi had 7 different investigations because of how guilty Obama and Hillary were, they didn't find evidence of any criminality, but that is just because of the Deep State.

We really need to skip courts altogether and just lock Obama and Hillary up, we already know they are guilty, courts will just try to protect them.

 

[Cardinal]

Glad to answer after you answer my question. Answering my question with a question is not how it works. Thank you.

Okay. If Mueller clears him I'll say, "Welp, I guess that's that."

Would you accept Mueller's official conclusion if he determines that Trump is guilty of crimes?

 

[Slingshot Bob]

Hey maybe they can impeach him for poor judgment. LAFFFFFF

Or because Maxine Waters does not think, "he deserves to be there"! lol.

 

[Sabre]

Yep, I figured that post would get all the left wing Trump haters in a bunch and it certainly did get a lot of panties in knots. :lamo

 

[Mycroft]

And to be clear, we have tons of evidence that Hillary, Obama and the DNC colluded with Russia -- if it wasn't for that liberal plant Jeff Sessions, these people would be in jail by now. Time for trump to fire sessions and put a guy in there who will do what Trump tells him to do.


However, this may all be for nothing because I do remember many Trump lovers saying "even if Trump did do it, collusion isn't illegal"

I think you are going to find that Sessions is one of the good guys.

He has an acute understanding of the political ramifications of going after those you mentioned...Hillary, etc. He also has to deal with the political fallout of going after the corruption of individuals in the DOJ, FBI and elsewhere. That corruption pervades almost the entire Obama administration, including Obama's WH. It takes care and finesse to unravel and deal with that twisted mass of snakes.

But be aware that he IS dealing with it. He's using the DOJ OIG and others as his investigative arm and he's using DOJ Prosecutor Huber, among others, as his fist. He's already dealt a crippling blow to one of the snakes...McCabe. This is going to take a while.

 

[poweRob]

Yep, I figured that post would get all the left wing Trump haters in a bunch and it certainly did get a lot of panties in knots. :lamo

So what you just admitted to was intentionally starting a troll thread. Interesting.

 

[Born Free]

Okay. If Mueller clears him I'll say, "Welp, I guess that's that."

Would you accept Mueller's official conclusion if he determines that Trump is guilty of crimes?

That's how I see it if Mueller finds him guilty.

 

[biff_poindexter]

Its not true that there hasnt been results of their investigations. What IS true is that the Obama DOJ refused to act on any of those known findings. Its KNOWN she lied under oath about the content of the servers. Its KNOWN that the DNC destroyed evidence...hell...Comey, KNOWING they were destroying evidence, gave them immunity from prosecution and then let them walk. They destroyed subpoenaed evidence in servers, cell phones, laptops. They hid evidence and when the evidence was found it proved Hillary lied about intentioanally sending and receiving classified materials...crimes civil servants lose clearances over, jobs over, and even see jail time over.

But I also know I just wasted 4 minutes typing known facts.

So since there are all "KNOWN FACTS" -- why do you suppose Trump's DOJ hasn't investigated it yet? Would you support Trump appointing Michael Cohen as Attorney General if he promised to lock up Obama and Hillary and skip the courts? -- That's how most respectable banana republics would do it...and we are a Republic

 

[biff_poindexter]

I think you are going to find that Sessions is one of the good guys.

He has an acute understanding of the political ramifications of going after those you mentioned...Hillary, etc. He also has to deal with the political fallout of going after the corruption of individuals in the DOJ, FBI and elsewhere. That corruption pervades almost the entire Obama administration, including Obama's WH. It takes care and finesse to unravel and deal with that twisted mass of snakes.

But be aware that he IS dealing with it. He's using the DOJ OIG and others as his investigative arm and he's using DOJ Prosecutor Huber, among others, as his fist. He's already dealt a crippling blow to one of the snakes...McCabe. This is going to take a while.

Let me make sure I get this right -- Mueller has been investigating for about a year and Trump lovers say that the fact its been this long proves there is no crime (aside from all the convictions and indictments)

But when it comes to Hillary and Obama -- Trump lovers then say it will take a long long long time because of how diabolical Obama is, even tho these same Trump lovers claim they is overwhelming proof Obama is Kenyan muslim terrorist treason guy or something...Trump lovers are pathetic

 

[jghiretire]

I doubt that this will stop people (the Trump haters) from continuing on with the charge even though it is now moot.

"the Republican-led House intelligence committee on Friday officially declared the end of its Russia probe, saying in its final report that it found no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia in the 2016 presidential campaign."

Many sources on this, most short, this is one.

GOP-led House panel officially clears Trump in Russia probe - Chicago Tribune

Gee, it helps if you don't interview half the witnesses and close it out early. But yeah thanks for the tip.

 

[biff_poindexter]

you guys arent just gonna let this go. years later after everyone has cleared trump on all angles yalls side still be crying "trump and russia!". meanwhile trump will have ended the korean war, made peace with russia by avoiding hillary and obamas cold war, and tons of other massive accomplishments that the left wing could have never done if they won the election.

Honest question, if during Obama's 2012 campaign, he had as many campaign and administration officials indicted and convicted (by his own DOJ, with Eric Holder as the special prosecutor) as Trump now does -- would you say "Nothing to see here, Pelosi said there is no evidence of collusion"??

 

[Vadinho]

The jury ruled murder in "To kill a mockingbird", is this not the same gambit?

 

[biff_poindexter]

Whats, ifs, ands, or buts, and wonders. No evidence.

What is exactly evidence to you? Would evidence be something that ends up in an indictment or conviction? Or is evidence to you something someone said or told you that reinforces your own bias? To me, the latter doesn't result in any convictions, something about the Constitution makes it that way. But, Hillary murdered Vince Foster and pizza gate is real

 

[Born Free]

Personally I doubt very much that Mueller will clear him. He has been involved in too many shaky deals (IMO)

I don't see he has a choice, with collusion, there have been house and senate investigations and with everything else there is not one shred of evidence of collusion. With regard to obstruction the president has the right to fire people, that is his constitutional right. Collusion is not a federal crime nor is obstruction by firing people as it's his right under our construction. Now Mueller may find this and that and hand it over to congress to decide if it warrants action, but without a crime to tag Trump with it will not go anywhere.

 

[biff_poindexter]

And I'm sure part of the fix was throwing a bomb into the Clinton campaign by reopening the email investigation. Again, you can't square this.

I have been reading a bunch of people recently who have come to the conclusion that the NeverTrumpers actually agree with most of what Trump does as President, it is his refusing to behave himself that they cant take.....the atmospherics count more to them than the work does, because they are all shallow like that.

Trump has been on the job long enough to earn the right to be judged by the quality of his work.

Which is pretty awesome.

The Never Trumpers agree with Trumps' policies because they are the same old GOP policies -- Trump is clueless about policy so any type of policy initiative is being driven by the same old GOP policy wonks who would have been there if Cruz or Kasich won the election.

What the Never Trumpers don't like is the fact that Trump doesn't blow the dog whistle, he blows a dog siren in Dolby surround sound. They like to keep their pandering to racists on the down low.

 

[Hawkeye10]

The Never Trumpers agree with Trumps' policies because they are the same old GOP policies -- Trump is clueless about policy so any type of policy initiative is being driven by the same old GOP policy wonks who would have been there if Cruz or Kasich won the election.

What the Never Trumpers don't like is the fact that Trump doesn't blow the dog whistle, he blows a dog siren in Dolby surround sound. They like to keep their pandering to racists on the down low.

The racism charge is used to cover for the fact that those who support Trump have more than enough reasons to not trust power in this country.

It is an EGO DEFENSE MECHANISM .

THere is almost no truth to the charge.

It goes down better than the truth.

 

[Mycroft]

Let me make sure I get this right -- Mueller has been investigating for about a year and Trump lovers say that the fact its been this long proves there is no crime (aside from all the convictions and indictments)

But when it comes to Hillary and Obama -- Trump lovers then say it will take a long long long time because of how diabolical Obama is, even tho these same Trump lovers claim they is overwhelming proof Obama is Kenyan muslim terrorist treason guy or something...Trump lovers are pathetic

Sorry, I can't answer for anything "Trump lovers" say. I can only speak for myself.

Perhaps you can come up with a question about what I said that doesn't include what you think Trump lovers say.

 

[Mycroft]

The Never Trumpers agree with Trumps' policies because they are the same old GOP policies -- Trump is clueless about policy so any type of policy initiative is being driven by the same old GOP policy wonks who would have been there if Cruz or Kasich won the election.

What the Never Trumpers don't like is the fact that Trump doesn't blow the dog whistle, he blows a dog siren in Dolby surround sound. They like to keep their pandering to racists on the down low.

Oh...when did the "same old GOP" pay more attention to Main Street than Wall Street? Never...in the last 30 years. When did the "same old GOP" ever use economics as a driving force for dealing with foreign policy and US security? Never.

Believe me, Trump is nowhere near the "same old GOP policies". Heck, that exactly why the "same old GOP" never wanted him to be elected.

 

[yankintx]

You can stop right there.

Sorry, but Committee Chairman Devin Nunes and his GOP majority committee have proven themselves as tainted, biased, and untrustworthy.

There is a cost for continuously running blatant political interference for Trump and his White House.

Yup and the blow back will more than likely result in the loss of the House.

 

[Born Free]

Gee, it helps if you don't interview half the witnesses and close it out early. But yeah thanks for the tip.

Yeah, from your liberal side there is an endless supply of witnesses you can call up. Like the toilet scrubber, the window washer, the toilet paper guy, the mail clerk, you know all these people that you can call half the witnesses that need to be interviewed. And heck, don't think of closing it down, keep the investigation going on forever.

I take it your half of the witnesses are far down the food chain hanging out in the bathroom handing you a towel for a tip.

 

[Sabre]

So what you just admitted to was intentionally starting a troll thread. Interesting.

Not hardly a troll, not my style, just presenting news that was unlikely to be posted in a positive note here with all the haters of which I certainly expected the typical reaction from. I wanted to start the news out on a positive note before the negatives started. Despite all the claims of bias from conservatives' I have never seen anything like the bias from the liberal side and the reactions being totally predictable show it. Including the side tract attempt at discounting the post as a troll when honest news was presented, that I knew the haters would not want to hear or agree with..
We conservative's have had to hear nothing but negatives towards Trump over this sham Russia investigation for months. We have said all along that it was a witch hunt and now it has been shown for exactly that. Sorry, no trolling, just the current facts of the issue!