• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

History Lesson as to why guns are the problem.

Bodi said:
It sure will make them harder to do though...


s
Click to expand...
Just like dating the use of heroin has made it hard to do that right?

If the government was competent enforcing laws no one could make an argument before the ownership of firearms.
 
Rich2018 said:
No, but they will significantly decrease those crimes involving a firearm.
Click to expand...

... and crime in general. Crime isn't so easy when you have a knife... think of kids or women or small guys... having to fight is much harder than pointing a gun at a person...

@Bum
 
Bodi said:
... and crime in general. Crime isn't so easy when you have a knife... think of kids or women or small guys... having to fight is much harder than pointing a gun at a person...

@Bum
Click to expand...
Well if you do crime then just get a gun because you don't care about consequences. Love's Banning things don't make them magically disappear.
 
Sweden said:
No one here thinks that making hand guns freely available in Sweden would decrease the murder rate.

About ten days ago three young men were shot dead in Uppsala, 7 miles from where I type. All were drug gang members, the alleged 16 year old shooter is also a gang member. The overwhelming majority of murders in Sweden are gang related.
Click to expand...
Which proves the criminals will still be armed and the law-abiding citizens will not. How is that a good outcome?
 
Bodi said:
No. I did not lie and you did not lie. I erred in not making it a Question Mark.

You said:



And I said, in error:



Not that complicated.


d
Click to expand...

"But you know that it was stupid?", is the question.

"You didn't watch it", is the false premise you're demanding be accepted to answer the fallaciously complex question.
 
Bodi said:
Yes. Seems a pretty obvious question at that...



Because I misread your comment... I just explained that.
Click to expand...

What comment of mine did you fail to understand?

Bodi said:
Is that a question?
Click to expand...

There isn't a question in my post other than my quoting your question.
 
Bodi said:
Asked and Answered


History Lesson as to why guns are the problem.

Now that is a lie!! d No, that is my opinion. It might be shared by others here.
debatepolitics.com debatepolitics.com


w
Click to expand...


Yeah. He said he watched the video, and you immediately formed a question around the premise that he did NOT watch the video. What did you misread? If you thought he said he did NOT watch the video, why didn't you just say that?
 
RF667799 said:
Yeah. He said he watched the video, and you immediately formed a question around the premise that he did NOT watch the video. What did you misread? If you thought he said he did NOT watch the video, why didn't you just say that?
Click to expand...

I did. He said he did watch it and I misread it and said he didn't watch it... but somehow knew that it was stupid.

This is really turning into quite the drama. What can I repeat for you now?


r
 
Bodi said:
I did. He said he did watch it and I misread it and said he didn't watch it... but somehow knew that it was stupid.

This is really turning into quite the drama. What can I repeat for you now?


r
Click to expand...
All you need to do is admit that you posted a lie about what I said and apologize for it.
 
JMB1911A1 said:
All you need to do is admit that you posted a lie about what I said and apologize for it.
Click to expand...

LOL. All you need to do is comprehend what you read in order to see that it was not a lie. 🤭



g
 
Bodi said:
I did. He said he did watch it and I misread it and said he didn't watch it... but somehow knew that it was stupid.

This is really turning into quite the drama. What can I repeat for you now?


r
Click to expand...

So an honest mistake attached to a fallacious question is what you're telling me.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Which proves the criminals will still be armed and the law-abiding citizens will not. How is that a good outcome?
Click to expand...
The 'Law-abiding' may also sometime shoot people. They may suffer mental illness, see threats where none exist and so on. There is no advanced country where people want to move towards US style gun ownership.
 
Sweden said:
The 'Law-abiding' may also sometime shoot people.
Click to expand...
That's extremely rare
Sweden said:
They may suffer mental illness, see threats where none exist and so on.
Click to expand...
To a statistically insignificant number to the point you should be more worried about police
Sweden said:
There is no advanced country where people want to move towards US style gun ownership.
Click to expand...
And many of them are seeing increased crime.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom