Conservative Gun Nuts fail to understand history and the damage that the 2nd Amendment has caused... but they don't care. They are Nuts.
d
Sounds like you're a slave to your paranoia though.I'd Rather live in dangerous freedom than safe slavery.
Conservative Gun Nuts fail to understand history and the damage that the 2nd Amendment has caused... but they don't care. They are Nuts.
d
I prefer rights. If that makes me paranoid, paranoid Liberty is better than the alternative.Sounds like you're a slave to your paranoia though.
Wow! Hurrah! Wild Applause! Never saw an issue reduced to a bumper sticker so immediately and so succinctly!I'd Rather live in dangerous freedom than safe slavery.
Well if you are forbidden to use wedding by law that just the law saying they can be used against you.Wow! Hurrah! Wild Applause! Never saw an issue reduced to a bumper sticker so immediately and so succinctly!
You sure are a paragon. A regular John Wayne.
Tell me, does your bumper-sticker world-view have room for anything between those two book-title dystopian societies?
Tell me, do you think that we in Sweden are living in slavery? And that only people in the USA are free?I'd Rather live in dangerous freedom than safe slavery.
Do you have any rights, can you use lethal Force to defend them? If not yes.Tell me, do you think that we in Sweden are living in slavery?
They are absolutely the most free. Our government isn't permitted to use their inconvenience at preventing crime to remove all of our rights.And that only people in the USA are free?
I'd Rather live in dangerous freedom than safe slavery.
Lots of people with wives and children in the United States. Are they all doomed because our government doesn't suspend all rights?Easy to say when you are young and don't have a wife or children...
My question for you is that if guns are the problem, as you claim. What is your solution to someone bigger and stronger from harming the smaller and weaker.
I wonder if the young DoorDash man lying in hospital in New York would agree with your point of view.Do you have any rights, can you use lethal Force to defend them? If not yes.
They are absolutely the most free. Our government isn't permitted to use their inconvenience at preventing crime to remove all of our rights.
Lots of people with wives and children in the United States. Are they all doomed because our government doesn't suspend all rights?
Appeals to emotion are illogical.I wonder if the young DoorDash man lying in hospital in New York would agree with your point of view.
More oppressive government, that never works out well.Right, because everybody in New Zealand and Sweden and Finland and Japan and South Korea and England and Austria, etc... are all ****ing doomed.
LOL
![]()
![]()
A bullet in the back is not an 'emotion', it is something very solid.Appeals to emotion are illogical.
But not something to throw rights away for. People commit crimes making everybody defenseless won't stop thatA bullet in the back is not an 'emotion', it is something very solid.
Tell me, do you think that we in Sweden are living in slavery? And that only people in the USA are free?
The homicide rate has increased in Sweden, and is now higher than that of many other countries in the EU.
Also I'm betting there more to that story than the tabloid is reporting.A bullet in the back is not an 'emotion', it is something very solid.
More oppressive government, that never works out well.
Maybe. The question remains: Do you consider a bullet in the back to be an 'emotion'.Also I'm betting there more to that story than the tabloid is reporting.
No I consider you using this as a pretense to steal away human rights as emotional manipulation.Maybe. The question remains: Do you consider a bullet in the back to be an 'emotion'.
Well what they're saying by saying you can't use this to defend yourself is that it can be used against you.Yep. We are all doomed under our oppressive governments.
LOL
d