alphamale
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2005
- Messages
- 1,120
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Southern California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I think Clark would make a good president. I don't want to see Hillary's name anywhere in 2008.kal-el said:Yea, IMO her chances on getting the nomination are practically in the bag. I mean who else do they have? John Kerry? Ran already, lost. Howard Dean? DNC chairman. The only way I'd vote for her is the lesser of 2 evils arguement, but if there is a more qualified candidate running, whatever party, I think I'll vote otherwise.
scottyz said:I think Clark would make a good president. I don't want to see Hillary's name anywhere in 2008.
Is America ready for a female president though? I have my doubts. I think McCain would beat her, but she could always use Dubya's strategy of spreading rumours about McCains black child to beat him.Kandahar said:Barring some kind of political upheaval in the Democratic Party, Hillary Clinton WILL be the nominee in 2008. She's smart, electable, and presidential. The Democratic Party seems ready to hold their nose and nominate another pro-war candidate, so this won't be a factor unless things completely collapse in Iraq. And I think the "bitch" reputation will wear off as people get to know her better and see that she's not like that at all.
If she's nominated, she'll probably win the general election since she's a very strong candidate (the strongest since her husband), and the Republican field looks very weak. The only Republicans who might have a chance at beating her are John McCain and Rudy Giuliani, but neither of them have a chance in hell of winning the primary. The other names that come up - Bill Frist, Rick Santorum, George Allen, Sam Brownback, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney - are all douchebags and/or have too many skeletons in their closets to stand a chance in the general.
Apparently lots of people because McCain lost to Bush.FinnMacCool said:Who gives a **** if he has a black child? The only people who care about that are those racist hillbilly bastards.
scottyz said:Is America ready for a female president though? I have my doubts. I think McCain would beat her, but she could always use Dubya's strategy of spreading rumours about McCains black child to beat him.
The Mark said:I would say she will be nominated........I mean, have any of you heard much in the media lately about other candidates for the Democratic party?
One thing is for sure in 2008, the next President of the United States will be a WOMEN! The race is practically all but set as Hilliary vs. Rice.
I assume your talking about Condi? I think it is just logistics. Republicans have nobody right now that can go against Hilliary. I would ponder voting for McCain if he got that far, but he won't get his parties nomination. Republicans do not like McCain (as this guy was saying on the factor tonight). I think he's right. He's not a popular Rep. Gulliani even has less of a chance. So the obvious one is Condellesa Rice. What she would do, as this guy was saying, is take away the black vote from the Democrats. I don't know the impact on the female vote because they don't vote for other women. Women are brutal with each other. Guys aren't that way. Just give me my sports and don't bang my women, and I'm a happy camper. Simple.Originally posted by purplehaze:
As I said I think rice could win if she ran. What makes you so sure she will though? Everytime she has been asked shes been pretty adamant that she will not run. I doesn't sound like the normal "its too early too say" denial, she seems pretty firm. Have you heard something else or just feel like she will run because everyone in the party will want her to.
Billo_Really said:I assume your talking about Condi? I think it is just logistics. Republicans have nobody right now that can go against Hilliary. I would ponder voting for McCain if he got that far, but he won't get his parties nomination. Republicans do not like McCain (as this guy was saying on the factor tonight). I think he's right. He's not a popular Rep. Gulliani even has less of a chance. So the obvious one is Condellesa Rice. What she would do, as this guy was saying, is take away the black vote from the Democrats. I don't know the impact on the female vote because they don't vote for other women. Women are brutal with each other. Guys aren't that way. Just give me my sports and don't bang my women, and I'm a happy camper. Simple.
I'll be voting for Hilliary in 2008. Everybody remembers the prosperity this country had with a Clinton in the White House. I'm sure the majority of this country misses those times.
scottyz said:Is America ready for a female president though? I have my doubts. I think McCain would beat her, but she could always use Dubya's strategy of spreading rumours about McCains black child to beat him.
purplehaze said:As I said I think rice could win if she ran. What makes you so sure she will though? Everytime she has been asked shes been pretty adamant that she will not run. I doesn't sound like the normal "its too early too say" denial, she seems pretty firm. Have you heard something else or just feel like she will run because everyone in the party will want her to.
You guys ought to know about faulty character making it to the White House.Originally posted by teacher:
But then Democrates go with their guy no matter how much their character is proven to be faulty.
I think a large part of America still thinks a womans role is to pop out children and cook.Kelzie said:Are you trying to say that Pakistan is ready for a female ruler, but not the United State of America? It's 2005, not 1805.
Not only will Condi not run, she won't even try. She has never been elected to an office. Never. Not once. The Republicans aren't that stupid. She should cut her teeth on some senate or governor race and try again later. Not in 2008 though.
scottyz said:I think a large part of America still thinks a womans role is to pop out children and cook.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?