• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary losing it.

WARNING WARNING
TROLL THREAD

Have you heard of bluetooth? I see people all the time that look like they are talking to themselves and they're just using bluetooth.

This is complete garbage. Whether or not she was on bluetooth, if people followed you everywhere I bet they could pick out a moment that makes you look crazy, but I wouldn't be dumb enough to think that was proof that you are.
 
Mustachio said:
WARNING WARNING
TROLL THREAD

Have you heard of bluetooth? I see people all the time that look like they are talking to themselves and they're just using bluetooth.

This is complete garbage. Whether or not she was on bluetooth, if people followed you everywhere I bet they could pick out a moment that makes you look crazy, but I wouldn't be dumb enough to think that was proof that you are.
Click to expand...

Am not a supporter of Clinton but do find it hilarious how terrified the Reps are of her. Just scared out of their wits.
 
This is the GOP's version of the 12-year itch with swift-boating .
 
We are going to have republicans talking about her shoes pretty soon, mark my words.
 
Mustachio said:
WARNING WARNING
TROLL THREAD

Have you heard of bluetooth? I see people all the time that look like they are talking to themselves and they're just using bluetooth.

This is complete garbage. Whether or not she was on bluetooth, if people followed you everywhere I bet they could pick out a moment that makes you look crazy, but I wouldn't be dumb enough to think that was proof that you are.
Click to expand...

I dont see how Hillary is capable of using a bluetooth but needed to delete emails because she didn't know you could have multiple email accounts on one phone.
 
If this is how petty, stupid and desperate the attack threads are getting now, wait until October 2016. These guys are going to be off their rockers.
 
TheDemSocialist said:
Losing what? And why is this in general politics? How is a politician walking outside a door worthy of political discussion?
Click to expand...

Just 17 more months and it will be all over. :2razz:
 
US Conservative said:
I dont see how Hillary is capable of using a bluetooth but needed to delete emails because she didn't know you could have multiple email accounts on one phone.
Click to expand...

Classic partisanship entails responding to a critique with a tangential attack that evades the issue. Nicely done.
 
US Conservative said:
Now she's talking to herself. Life on the road in that little commoner van must be tough.
https://instagram.com/p/2CKIcpOgw8/
Click to expand...

I would have guessed a little fun poking would bring the expected results.

She probably IS using blue tooth, so what? If it were a Bush you know this would be the thread.

I loved the imperial wave as she simply ignored the question about the people of Baltimore. "let them eat cake!"
 
Fearandloathing said:
I would have guessed a little fun poking would bring the expected results.

She probably IS using blue tooth, so what? If it were a Bush you know this would be the thread.

I loved the imperial wave as she simply ignored the question about the people of Baltimore. "let them eat cake!"
Click to expand...

I love the twisted perception of the right wing.

Politician doesnt answer a random question fired from a crowd, and he goes to "let them eat cake." It's amazing. Perception twists reality in a way to reinforce the perception.
 
Deuce said:
I love the twisted perception of the right wing.

Politician doesnt answer a random question fired from a crowd, and he goes to "let them eat cake." It's amazing. Perception twists reality in a way to reinforce the perception.
Click to expand...

Let us know when Hillary actually decides to answer a question.

Question 1: "Secretary Clinton, your reaction please to these book allegations? Did foreign entities receive any special treatment for making any kind of donations to the foundation or your husband?"—ABC in Keene, New Hampshire, April 20
Clinton: "Well, we're back into the political season, and therefore we will be subjected to all kinds of distraction and attacks. And I'm ready for that. I know that that comes unfortunately with the territory. It is, I think, worth noting that the Republicans seem to be talking only about me. I don't know what they'd talk about if I weren't in the race. But I am in the race, and hopefully we'll get on to the issues, and I look forward to that."
Click to expand...

Here Are All Seven Media Questions Hillary Clinton Has Answered During Her Campaign - NationalJournal.com
 
Deuce said:
I love the twisted perception of the right wing.

Politician doesnt answer a random question fired from a crowd, and he goes to "let them eat cake." It's amazing. Perception twists reality in a way to reinforce the perception.
Click to expand...



you know I'm a liberal right? Support universal health care, a strong social safety net funded by a wealthy economy, gay marriage sine the late 1990's....

I don't know many in the "right wing" who agree with me on those points.

Face it, your star is a dog that won't hunt, real liberals see through the bull****. She's another populist/socialist, a feminine Don Quixote tilting at the relatively resolved, here anyway, feminist cause. But then we half our premiers are women, one of them a lesbian, and we had our first female prime minister in the late 80's.

Welcome to real progressive thinking.
 
Deuce said:
I love the twisted perception of the right wing.

Politician doesnt answer a random question fired from a crowd, and he goes to "let them eat cake." It's amazing. Perception twists reality in a way to reinforce the perception.
Click to expand...

She's entirely fake. She's putting on a show as a "champion of the common man", just the latest example of her clearly demonstrated pattern. She's a nut.
 
Fearandloathing said:
"tangential" as in 'only indirectly related' or referring to a tangent, off topic, or off track?
Click to expand...

Only indirectly related. It is true that I brought up technology but that's as far as his response went in terms of relevancy.

I don't think this was worthy of a thread, if for some reason a person found it to be noteworthy, a Hillary-related thread bump seems more appropriate. I'm not speaking from the perspective of a moderator, I'm speaking from the perspective of a person who cares only about political issues that matter.
 
Fearandloathing said:
you know I'm a liberal right? Support universal health care, a strong social safety net funded by a wealthy economy, gay marriage sine the late 1990's....

I don't know many in the "right wing" who agree with me on those points.

Face it, your star is a dog that won't hunt, real liberals see through the bull****. She's another populist/socialist, a feminine Don Quixote tilting at the relatively resolved, here anyway, feminist cause. But then we half our premiers are women, one of them a lesbian, and we had our first female prime minister in the late 80's.

Welcome to real progressive thinking.
Click to expand...

She's a dog alright, a female dog. Its a shame she's the dems best shot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom