• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton Suggests Murdering Julian Assange to Silence Him

truthatallcost said:
What Snopes did is called damage control. I can only speculate about what else Mr. Assange will release about Hillary Clinton soon.

Nervous Redress?
Click to expand...

Facts are damage control now. I suppose that fits in well with your concept that unsourced speculation is truth.
 
Redress said:
Facts are damage control now. I suppose that fits in well with your concept that unsourced speculation is truth.
Click to expand...

It's not a mistake that Snopes rakes in $15,000,000 a year while pretending to be just your average middle aged married couple that lives modestly and likes cats.

They are lock step with the Dems agenda.
 
truthatallcost said:
It's not a mistake that Snopes rakes in $15,000,000 a year while pretending to be just your average middle aged married couple that lives modestly and likes cats.

They are lock step with the Dems agenda.
Click to expand...

Funny how you refuse to address what snopes actually said. I wonder why that might be....
 
truthatallcost said:
19cn91.jpg
Click to expand...
hilarious! kudos
 
Redress said:
Funny how you refuse to address what snopes actually said. I wonder why that might be....
Click to expand...

they said it was unproven.

not false. unproven.

you seem to be in a rush to discount it. what's the hurry shilly boy?
 
truthatallcost said:
From WikiLeaks Twitter page;

View attachment 67208042

Apparently WL believes Hillary was serious when she asked if it's possible to "drone" Assange to remove him from being a thorn in her side.

I wouldn't put it past her.

Thoughts?
Comments?

https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileak...2?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^tweet
Click to expand...


This is what happens when one of the peasant class dares to question one of the Royal Class. The lives of common people are as worthless as the lives of insects to the self appointed Kings and Queens in Washington DC.
 
Henrin said:
Lol. Drone strike an embassy? This woman really is a retard.
Click to expand...
What is retarded would be thinking that a if this were even true that it took place during the last few months, meaning the criminal was hiding somewhere else at the time. I bet you think she was serious. So next time trump says something stupid, any second now, you will not have any reason to tell us that he really did not mean it.
 
Maybe if Prez NIXON had threatened to murder Woodward & Bernstein, the US media would mostly be silent...?

But in fact we have that TODAY..!

Hillary threatens to DRONE a world-famous jouranlist yet only the fringe media (which in fact is the REAL media) reports it.
 
Manc Skipper said:
The comment has echoes of the frustrated "Who will rid me of this turbulent priest?" Though none of Hillary's staff would act on an obvious joke, and literary reference. The same could not be said about Trump's nudge nudge wink wink assassination call toward "second amendment people"
Click to expand...

Considering the history of both candidates, you think Trump would be more likely to kill an adversary and not Clinton?

That is funny.
 
truthatallcost said:
Trump has never had the ability to try to influence drone strikes being carried out, so your comment doesn't really make sense.
Click to expand...

Nor have people around him been dropping like flies sprayed with Raid.
 
Redress said:
Way to fail to counter what I said. Do you think random memes will make you look less silly?
Click to expand...

Didn't seem random, seemed pretty on point.
 
Casper said:
What is retarded would be thinking that a if this were even true that it took place during the last few months, meaning the criminal was hiding somewhere else at the time. I bet you think she was serious. So next time trump says something stupid, any second now, you will not have any reason to tell us that he really did not mean it.
Click to expand...

If the story is true,m people in the room apparently thought she was serious.
 
Mason66 said:
If the story is true,m people in the room apparently thought she was serious.
Click to expand...

Yeah sure she was, just like Trump was serious about carpet bombing the ME or using Nukes when he feels like it? And there ya go another desperation claim by a candidates fan club.:coffeepap
 
Casper said:
Yeah sure she was, just like Trump was serious about carpet bombing the ME or using Nukes when he feels like it? And there ya go another desperation claim by a candidates fan club.:coffeepap
Click to expand...

Read the OP.
 
Seriously people.... She made a bad joke, just as Trump has done a few times. It's what people do and it rarely indicates anything beyond trying to relieve the stress of a moment or trying to make oneself look funny.
 
volsrock said:
Maybe if Prez NIXON had threatened to murder Woodward & Bernstein, the US media would mostly be silent...?

But in fact we have that TODAY..!

Hillary threatens to DRONE a world-famous jouranlist yet only the fringe media (which in fact is the REAL media) reports it.
Click to expand...

Cenk Uygur from the Young Turks said that he felt that many journalists were actually glad that Michael Hastings was killed. He said that most journalists were resentful against Hastings for being a true truth teller, and that 99.9% of journalists don't have the balls to do what Hastings did.

Uygur admitted that journalists are beholden to business/government interests, and that they know they'll be targeted if they get out of line.

Assange is completely sound in his belief that the US government would eliminate him if they could.
 
Manc Skipper said:
The comment has echoes of the frustrated "Who will rid me of this turbulent priest?" Though none of Hillary's staff would act on an obvious joke, and literary reference. The same could not be said about Trump's nudge nudge wink wink assassination call toward "second amendment people"
Click to expand...

"Who will rid me of this turbulent priest" is apropos. First learned about that one from The Black Adder.
 
faithful_servant said:
Seriously people.... She made a bad joke, just as Trump has done a few times. It's what people do and it rarely indicates anything beyond trying to relieve the stress of a moment or trying to make oneself look funny.
Click to expand...

This, though Clinton's audience was private whereas Trump's joke was accessible to every psycho in America.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom