• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton Suggests Murdering Julian Assange to Silence Him

Since drones were activated back in the day.. this has been the go to question on pretty much everything. Not a big shocker that someone talked about doing it on Assange.. which only justifies his paranoia.
 
Since drones were activated back in the day.. this has been the go to question on pretty much everything. Not a big shocker that someone talked about doing it on Assange.. which only justifies his paranoia.

I wouldn't put it past her.
 
Since drones were activated back in the day.. this has been the go to question on pretty much everything. Not a big shocker that someone talked about doing it on Assange.. which only justifies his paranoia.

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't someone out there looking to kill ya.
 
I wouldn't put it past her.

Would not put it past any politician in the US regardless of the color of their party. Drones are easy, cheap and you dont have to deal with the clean up.
 
The comment has echoes of the frustrated "Who will rid me of this turbulent priest?" Though none of Hillary's staff would act on an obvious joke, and literary reference. The same could not be said about Trump's nudge nudge wink wink assassination call toward "second amendment people"
 
Would not put it past any politician in the US regardless of the color of their party. Drones are easy, cheap and you dont have to deal with the clean up.

Mainly the Democrats and Republicans. Third-parties and political outsiders aren't corrupted by the military-industrial complex.
 
Mainly the Democrats and Republicans. Third-parties and political outsiders aren't corrupted by the military-industrial complex.

Has nothing to do with the military industrial complex, but the general mindset of the American people.. shoot first and never ask questions later. Violence before negotiation.. that attitude. It has gotten you guys in so much trouble the last 50 years that it is not even funny.
 
Has nothing to do with the military industrial complex, but the general mindset of the American people.. shoot first and never ask questions later. Violence before negotiation.. that attitude. It has gotten you guys in so much trouble the last 50 years that it is not even funny.

Agreed...mostly. Not all Americans are like that though. There's a good bit here woke as ****. Those of us who know what our government is doing around the world, and we're not happy.
To be more specific, there's something like 11 different unrecognized sub-nations within the U.S. I've lived in 4 of them (Appalachia - currently, along with the Left Coast/New China, New France and the Deep South), I don't think the U.S. should separate, but the dominant Northeast/Atlantic needs to really step its game up of proportional representation (the largest military installation in the world is in Norfolk, Virginia - as an example).

There's also the Rust Belt, which has been mentioned a great deal this election season.
 
Has nothing to do with the military industrial complex, but the general mindset of the American people.. shoot first and never ask questions later. Violence before negotiation.. that attitude. It has gotten you guys in so much trouble the last 50 years that it is not even funny.

Because negotiation worked so well when Herr Hitler and the Wehrmacht came knocking, right?
 
The Snopes Spin Team was fast on the heels of the Wikileaks Tweet, stating that there's nothing to worry about, the accusation is Unproven (with a big red X at the top for people who don't read), and go vote for Hill in November!

Maybe Assange will release more about Hillary's drone comments on Wednesday, and Snopes can pull their Unproven assessment and pretend like nothing happened.
 
Would not put it past any politician in the US regardless of the color of their party. Drones are easy, cheap and you dont have to deal with the clean up.

What do you call cheap?
 
"Sources said"?

My thoughts are that this story starts and ends in the same place... nowhere.

Maybe it's not a coincidence that WL decided to release this on Monday, with Assange speaking in public on Wednesday? Maybe he's worried about his safety in Berlin and is putting this info out there in case something happens to him from now until his Wednesday appearance.
 
Back
Top Bottom