Julian Assange said earlier today that the US government has more than enough evidence to indict Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Is this evidence of nonfeasance? He is saying the FBI will use this as a feather in their cap. Beside the theory, there is evidence that she instructed her office to strip information of a classified header and send it as a regular fax.
That is true, she did do that... But like he said, there is no way Obama will allow Lynch to indict Hillary Clinton. The fix is in, and those on the left are going to vote for more of the same corruption.
.
I would rejoice in anything that brought Hillary down. If not for who would get elected if that happened. I think the Republicans are in a death spiral, my only question is if the rest of the country is as well.
Trump would be better? he's a nut.
I would rejoice in anything that brought Hillary down. If not for who would get elected if that happened. I think the Republicans are in a death spiral, my only question is if the rest of the country is as well.
Is there some kind of process in place for such an event? Surely Trump wouldn't win by default? If Bernie was not allowed to re-enter then I'd expect a much stronger 3rd party showing than normal. Winning the Republican nomination is not enough to make you the POTUS automatically, even if there is no democratic opposition.
I would rejoice in anything that brought Hillary down. If not for who would get elected if that happened. I think the Republicans are in a death spiral, my only question is if the rest of the country is as well.
Yea, but then there is Trump. This election really worries me.
Trump would be better? he's a nut.
Hillary is a megalomaniac though. Hillary is cold. Trump is hot. However Hillary has had access to every political advisor imaginable and she's still an incompetent mess. If Trump (or hell anyone) had access to the best advisors money could buy they'd be a far more competent individual. It's like having a private tutor during k-12 and barely getting into a community college. Hillary has had every opportunity to prove herself competent and has failed every time, sometimes in spectacular fashion.
He may be a nut, but I still think He is better than hillary. Only because I feel Trump would not do some of the trade deals Clinton would. I feel Clinton would hurt skilled trade Labour with her deals.
Is there some kind of process in place for such an event? Surely Trump wouldn't win by default? If Bernie was not allowed to re-enter then I'd expect a much stronger 3rd party showing than normal. Winning the Republican nomination is not enough to make you the POTUS automatically, even if there is no democratic opposition.
Hillary is a megalomaniac though. Hillary is cold. Trump is hot. However Hillary has had access to every political advisor imaginable and she's still an incompetent mess. If Trump (or hell anyone) had access to the best advisors money could buy they'd be a far more competent individual. It's like having a private tutor during k-12 and barely getting into a community college. Hillary has had every opportunity to prove herself competent and has failed every time, sometimes in spectacular fashion.
we have two amazingly horrible choices this election. I dont know that we can put that fine a point on it.
we have two amazingly horrible choices this election. I dont know that we can put that fine a point on it.
He may be a nut, but I still think He is better than hillary. Only because I feel Trump would not do some of the trade deals Clinton would. I feel Clinton would hurt skilled trade Labour with her deals.
It's like choosing between whether you want the **** sandwich, or the puke milkshake.
Hillary supporters would (somewhat ironically) probably tell you to check your privilege.
Trump supporters would probably just ignore the mountain of evidence which substantiates your claim (with or without the GOP, but more broadly in the election as a whole)
And Trump wouldn't be willing to go to war against Russia and he wants to pull out of NATO. These are the only things I agree with him on (besides trade deals), and they are fairly huge because Hillary would do one and not the other (I'm sure you can guess which one's which).
Trump will destroy Hillary. The DNC couldn't have handed him a more flawed candidate. Plus, he's a con-artist. Unless Gary Johnson can pull off an upset, or the DNC nominates Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump will be our next President.
Trump will destroy Hillary. The DNC couldn't have handed him a more flawed candidate. Plus, he's a con-artist. Unless Gary Johnson can pull off an upset, or the DNC nominates Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump will be our next President.
LOL! Bookmarked. Thanks for the chuckles.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?