• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton Attacks Judicial Watch For Exposing Email Scandal.....

MMC

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
56,981
Reaction score
27,029
Location
Chicago Illinois
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Private
Indeed desperation time has set in for Hillary and her Team. First her Team Blames Republicans..... Her spokesperson Jennifer PalmMeAiry then blamed the NY Times. Now Hillary blames Judicial Watch. Judicial Watch put out a response. At least Hillary admits for 20 years she hasn't been so transparent and another reason why she can't be trusted. What say ye?



Now, as Judicial Watch continues to expose Clinton's lies about her email practices, Clinton is publicly attacking the group in an effort to discredit them. From a Univision interview yesterday.

HRC: No, because you have to remember Judicial Watch is a partisan group that has been suing Democrats, me in particular, for twenty years. Anything that they can sue over to create partisan advantage, they do. The facts are very clear here. I did turn over all work-related e-mails in an effort to help the State Department make sure that their records were complete. And those are the facts. Now that doesn’t mean I will ever convince these partisans who are, you know, trying to make all sorts of allegations. But I think the American people understand that.

"Hillary Clinton’s attacks on Judicial Watch for its success in suing for her State Department records under the Freedom of Information Act will not deter us from our nonpartisan work. Hillary Clinton has a nasty record of attacking and threatening those who try to hold her accountable to the law. It was Hillary Clinton who chose to conduct official government business on a separate email system. It was this decision by Hillary Clinton that placed classified information and the nation’s security at risk," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in response to Clinton's attacks. "In addition, it prevented government records from being properly searched as required by law in response to Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act requests and lawsuits. A federal judge has led the way in requesting answers from her under penalty of perjury. Mrs. Clinton has a problem with the truth and obeying the law – and that is why a federal judge has requested information from Mrs. Clinton, the State Department, and her closest advisors. Blaming Judicial Watch for the email mess she made is pathetic.".....snip~

Hillary Clinton Attacks Judicial Watch For Exposing Email Scandal - Katie Pavlich
 
Hillary's explanation should include that notoriously partisan group, the FBI, and that notoriously partisan IG. They're out to get her too. Never mind that those two entities generally don't investigate such things without cause, and there seems to be an abundance of that.
 
Quite the 'attack'
"you have to remember Judicial Watch is a partisan group that has been suing Democrats, me in particular, for twenty years" :roll:
 
At this point, attacks on Hillary can only come from partisan sources. The left is too much in her thrall and even the supposedly neutral career bureaucrats are terrified of her.
 
Quite the 'attack'
"you have to remember Judicial Watch is a partisan group that has been suing Democrats, me in particular, for twenty years" :roll:

The fact that she is personally on the defensive is very telling. Recall that Hillary usually does this sort of thing through surrogates.
 
Last edited:
The fact that she is personally on the defensive is very telling. Recall that Hillary usual does this sort of thing through surrogates.

Did you read the question she was asked?
 
Hillary's explanation should include that notoriously partisan group, the FBI, and that notoriously partisan IG. They're out to get her too. Never mind that those two entities generally don't investigate such things without cause, and there seems to be an abundance of that.

Mornin HB. They got her ass this time. Its what they do with what they have discovered. She is in serious trouble, so to her Aides and they all have Lawyered up, and I do mean lawyered up. Its got the Demos and the Left in panic mode.
danceshout.gif



Dems in panic mode as Hillary’s team lawyers up.....

Instead, Hillary’s team is now lawyering up. Politico reports today that Huma Abedin has a team of lawyers on the case as she comes under scrutiny from both Congress and federal judges probing the evasion of FOIA demands during Hillary’s tenure — and Abedin’s unusual financial arrangements at State:

All of this has Hillary’s fellow Democrats “near panic mode,” The Hill reports: Coupled with new polls that suggest Clinton is vulnerable, Democrats are nearing full-on panic mode.

“I’m not sure they completely understand the credibility they are losing, by the second,” said one Democratic strategist, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “At some point this goes from being something you can rationalize away to something that becomes political cancer. And we are getting pretty close to the cancer stage, because this is starting to get ridiculous.”....snip~

Dems in panic mode as Hillary?s team lawyers up « Hot Air
 
Indeed desperation time has set in for Hillary and her Team. First her Team Blames Republicans..... Her spokesperson Jennifer PalmMeAiry then blamed the NY Times. Now Hillary blames Judicial Watch. Judicial Watch put out a response. At least Hillary admits for 20 years she hasn't been so transparent and another reason why she can't be trusted. What say ye?



Now, as Judicial Watch continues to expose Clinton's lies about her email practices, Clinton is publicly attacking the group in an effort to discredit them. From a Univision interview yesterday.

HRC: No, because you have to remember Judicial Watch is a partisan group that has been suing Democrats, me in particular, for twenty years. Anything that they can sue over to create partisan advantage, they do. The facts are very clear here. I did turn over all work-related e-mails in an effort to help the State Department make sure that their records were complete. And those are the facts. Now that doesn’t mean I will ever convince these partisans who are, you know, trying to make all sorts of allegations. But I think the American people understand that.

"Hillary Clinton’s attacks on Judicial Watch for its success in suing for her State Department records under the Freedom of Information Act will not deter us from our nonpartisan work. Hillary Clinton has a nasty record of attacking and threatening those who try to hold her accountable to the law. It was Hillary Clinton who chose to conduct official government business on a separate email system. It was this decision by Hillary Clinton that placed classified information and the nation’s security at risk," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in response to Clinton's attacks. "In addition, it prevented government records from being properly searched as required by law in response to Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act requests and lawsuits. A federal judge has led the way in requesting answers from her under penalty of perjury. Mrs. Clinton has a problem with the truth and obeying the law – and that is why a federal judge has requested information from Mrs. Clinton, the State Department, and her closest advisors. Blaming Judicial Watch for the email mess she made is pathetic.".....snip~

Hillary Clinton Attacks Judicial Watch For Exposing Email Scandal - Katie Pavlich

As far as I am concerned, the woman is unvotable. But that has to do with the scandals' in her home State never having been cleared up and made transparent. To vote for a person of so suspicious background in an election for a person of power would be stupid. What she has done since may be for the courts, but is is irrelevant for my vote. She could stand on her head and pee in the air and it would not change my vote. The problem is that Sanders is a rather ugly alternative.
 
Indeed desperation time has set in for Hillary and her Team. First her Team Blames Republicans..... Her spokesperson Jennifer PalmMeAiry then blamed the NY Times. Now Hillary blames Judicial Watch. Judicial Watch put out a response. At least Hillary admits for 20 years she hasn't been so transparent and another reason why she can't be trusted. What say ye?

Now, as Judicial Watch continues to expose Clinton's lies about her email practices, Clinton is publicly attacking the group in an effort to discredit them. From a Univision interview yesterday.

HRC: No, because you have to remember Judicial Watch is a partisan group that has been suing Democrats, me in particular, for twenty years. Anything that they can sue over to create partisan advantage, they do. The facts are very clear here. I did turn over all work-related e-mails in an effort to help the State Department make sure that their records were complete. And those are the facts. Now that doesn’t mean I will ever convince these partisans who are, you know, trying to make all sorts of allegations. But I think the American people understand that.

"Hillary Clinton’s attacks on Judicial Watch for its success in suing for her State Department records under the Freedom of Information Act will not deter us from our nonpartisan work. Hillary Clinton has a nasty record of attacking and threatening those who try to hold her accountable to the law. It was Hillary Clinton who chose to conduct official government business on a separate email system. It was this decision by Hillary Clinton that placed classified information and the nation’s security at risk," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in response to Clinton's attacks. "In addition, it prevented government records from being properly searched as required by law in response to Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act requests and lawsuits. A federal judge has led the way in requesting answers from her under penalty of perjury. Mrs. Clinton has a problem with the truth and obeying the law – and that is why a federal judge has requested information from Mrs. Clinton, the State Department, and her closest advisors. Blaming Judicial Watch for the email mess she made is pathetic.".....snip~

Hillary Clinton Attacks Judicial Watch For Exposing Email Scandal - Katie Pavlich

It's not going to do Hillary any good attacking Judicial Watch. She's got far more problems much closer to home, and they are within her own perimeter, if you will.

Author Ed Klein claimed that Hillary Clinton is under six investigations prompted by the White House on Wednesday’s “Fox & Friends” on the Fox News Channel.

Klein said that the White House was leaking unfriendly stories to the press about the Clintons and “it’s not only me who thinks this, Bill Clinton thinks this as well. He has said, according to my sources, that the White House is leaking to their friendly — their friends in the mainstream media stories about the Clintons, not only about Hillary, but about him and about what she did while she was in the State Department. And it’s my understanding that — and this is from sources within the White House, that the Clintons know that Hillary is under not one, but six different investigations prompted by the White House.”

He added that State Department sources are “saying that they’re taking tons of documents. They see them being wheeled through the corridors from Clinton’s old offices, and they’re going through these looking for problems on her expense account, on her dealings with foreign leaders. All of this, I’m told, is prompted by Valerie Jarrett, and the president who do not want to see Hillary Clinton President of the United States…they feel the Clintons are very centrist as far as the Democratic Party is concerned, that if Hillary becomes president, she won’t carry out the legacy of Barack Obama, which is much further to the left than the Clintons, that she’ll cooperate with the Republicans the way Bill Clinton did when he was in office, and dilute whatever Obama was able to accomplish.”
Ed Klein: W.H. Has Six Investigations Into Hillary - Breitbart

Between this attack from within, and her self inflicted email scandal, I think her presidency is toast.

How dare she even attempt to have a better presidency than the great one, the only one, the lord Obama! Vengeance shall be his.

The fact that she is personally on the defensive is very telling. Recall that Hillary usual does this sort of thing through surrogates.

A cornered and wounded Hildabeast are the most dangerous Hildabeasts. :mrgreen:
 
Last edited:
HRC wasn't blaming Judicial Watch for the email scandal, she didn't bring them into the discussion, the initerviewer did.
 
It's not going to do Hillary any good attacking Judicial Watch. She's got far more problems much closer to home, and they are within her own perimeter, if you will.

Ed Klein: W.H. Has Six Investigations Into Hillary - Breitbart

Between this attack from within, and her self inflicted email scandal, I think her presidency is toast.

How dare she even attempt to have a better presidency than the great one, the only one, the lord Obama! Vengeance shall be his.



A cornered and wounded Hildabeast are the most dangerous Hildabeasts. :mrgreen:

If you think this 'scandal' will do her in, you have a deal to learn. This is a very little bump on the road to the presidency. :mrgreen:
 
HRC wasn't blaming Judicial Watch for the email scandal, she didn't bring them into the discussion, the initerviewer did.

Her response shows she did Pete. Doesn't matter who brought them into the discussion. Whether it was Univision or not. Its her words. She didn't have to go into all of that. All she had to say she was working to address their FOIA's.
 
Mornin HB. They got her ass this time. Its what they do with what they have discovered. She is in serious trouble, so to her Aides and they all have Lawyered up, and I do mean lawyered up. Its got the Demos and the Left in panic mode.
danceshout.gif



Dems in panic mode as Hillary’s team lawyers up.....

Instead, Hillary’s team is now lawyering up. Politico reports today that Huma Abedin has a team of lawyers on the case as she comes under scrutiny from both Congress and federal judges probing the evasion of FOIA demands during Hillary’s tenure — and Abedin’s unusual financial arrangements at State:

All of this has Hillary’s fellow Democrats “near panic mode,” The Hill reports: Coupled with new polls that suggest Clinton is vulnerable, Democrats are nearing full-on panic mode.

“I’m not sure they completely understand the credibility they are losing, by the second,” said one Democratic strategist, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “At some point this goes from being something you can rationalize away to something that becomes political cancer. And we are getting pretty close to the cancer stage, because this is starting to get ridiculous.”....snip~

Dems in panic mode as Hillary?s team lawyers up « Hot Air

Yep, and at some point, one of them will squeal. 5 years in Federal prison is a lot more attractive than 20.
 
Her response shows she did Pete. Doesn't matter who brought them into the discussion. Whether it was Univision or not. Its her words. She didn't have to go into all of that. All she had to say she was working to address their FOIA's.
Tell that story to someone who believes you. :mrgreen:
 
If you think this 'scandal' will do her in, you have a deal to learn. This is a very little bump on the road to the presidency. :mrgreen:

Yeah, a few felonies are nothing. I think Hillary's experience of the WH will now have to rely on memories. She won't end up in prison, but she surely won't end up in the WH either. That's enough for me. As Shrubby is fond of saying, "Wait and see."
 

Ya know, Pete, somebody removed the security classifications from those communications, and State said it wasn't them. Have you thought about exactly who that leaves as the likely culprit? That felony carries a rather hefty prison sentence.
 
As far as I am concerned, the woman is unvotable. But that has to do with the scandals' in her home State never having been cleared up and made transparent. To vote for a person of so suspicious background in an election for a person of power would be stupid. What she has done since may be for the courts, but is is irrelevant for my vote. She could stand on her head and pee in the air and it would not change my vote. The problem is that Sanders is a rather ugly alternative.

Heya Jog. :2wave: Myself.....I am wondering how Huma Abedin who has connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. Would be able to get all that money to afford a team of attorneys.
 
Ya know, Pete, somebody removed the security classifications from those communications, and State said it wasn't them. Have you thought about exactly who that leaves as the likely culprit? That felony carries a rather hefty prison sentence.

True. So who is it going to be? Who is going to fall on their swords for the Hildabeast? Mills or Abedin? Or yet to be named player?
 
If you think this 'scandal' will do her in, you have a deal to learn. This is a very little bump on the road to the presidency. :mrgreen:

With Jarret leaking the dirty inside information the WH staff has collected to do the damage, these land like hard hitting body punches, so I think you are seriously fooling yourself.

Hillary is fighting not only for her political life anymore, she's fighting against criminal charges and the possible incarceration that comes with them.

I don't think that the presidency is in the cards for her anymore.
 
Heya Jog. :2wave: Myself.....I am wondering how Huma Abedin who has connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. Would be able to get all that money to afford a team of attorneys.

Rich Muslims abound.
 
With Jarret leaking the dirty inside information the WH staff has collected to do the damage, these land like hard hitting body punches, so I think you are seriously fooling yourself.

Hillary is fighting not only for her political life anymore, she's fighting against criminal charges and the possible incarceration that comes with them.

I don't think that the presidency is in the cards for her anymore.

Keep it up, you are indeed funny with your hype. What percentage of Americans either know or care about any of this?
 
True. So who is it going to be? Who is going to fall on their swords for the Hildabeast? Mills or Abedin? Or yet to be named player?

I don't know, but it'll sure be interesting to watch it unfold. One count of guilt in this matter can carry up to 15 years in prison, I think. They're all prospective employees of the Clinton Foundation now.
 
Yep, and at some point, one of them will squeal. 5 years in Federal prison is a lot more attractive than 20.

Looks like she isn't going to allow Hillary to force her to take any fall. Guess that leaves Cheryl Mills who received an Emergency Court order to not destroy any evidence.
 
Back
Top Bottom