Hey left remember when

[iguanaman]

Hmm....last summer? Who could have possibly ordered that investigation? Is it possible that a certain administration was busy creating a narrative regarding a presidential candidate's possible links to the hacking of Podesta and the DNC? Is it possible that the investigation didn't show a damned thing but now, after the election, they decided to use what little information was gleaned as a smear campaign? Is it possible that all of this is is part of an attempted coup against the elected President?

Yes, these career professionals are making it all up because they don't like Trump. You sound like Nixon after Watergate.

 

[Lutherf]

Yes, these career professionals are making it all up because they don't like Trump. You sound like Nixon after Watergate.

We don't know what, if anything, they're making up. All we know is that they have made accusations and released those accusations to the press....without substantiation.

 

[jbander]

He lied to the VP, Trump fires ...Obama made excuses and blamed others

thats funny the V president knew a month before that.

 

[tres borrachos]

No problem at all, my friend.

I need to read the entire thread before posting. Ugh, I do that a lot!

 

[Fishking]

:coffeepap

Hmmm?....what was that you were saying?

Intelligence Official: Transcripts Of Flynn's Calls Don't Show Criminal Wrongdoing : The Two-Way : NPR

 

[Utility Man]

Hmmm?....what was that you were saying?

Intelligence Official: Transcripts Of Flynn's Calls Don't Show Criminal Wrongdoing : The Two-Way : NPR

From the article you posted, not just the headline.......

......A current U.S. intelligence official tells NPR's Mary Louise Kelly that there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing in the transcripts of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn's conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, although the official noted that doesn't rule out the possibility of illegal actions.......

....in his resignation Flynn said he "inadvertently" gave Pence "incomplete information" about the conversations....

.....The intelligence official who has personally seen the transcripts told Mary Louise they contained "no evidence" of criminal wrongdoing, although the official said it can't be definitively ruled out.....

...."I don't think [Flynn] knew he was doing anything wrong," the official said. "Flynn talked about sanctions, but no specific promises were made. Flynn was speaking more in general 'maybe we'll take a look at this going forward' terms."......

...." 'That raises the stakes of what so far has been a political scandal that cost Mr. Flynn his job. If the authorities conclude that Mr. Flynn knowingly lied to the F.B.I., it could expose him to a felony charge.' ".....

Intelligence Official: Transcripts Of Flynn's Calls Don't Show Criminal Wrongdoing : The Two-Way : NPR

We know, we know.

He didn't lie, he just used "alternative facts". :mrgreen:

The day before sanctions are announced, Flynn was discussing sanctions with Russia.

Nothing to see here.

 

[Mr Person]

You guys screamed Hillary broke no laws not charged she was cleared etc?

That's because the FBI said so after investigating it.

Well Flynn will not be charged broke no laws etc...

Stupid lie.

It actually has to be investigated and a determination made, AND then "the left" (usually meaning one liberal somewhere) says "lock him up" anyway, before you can do this stupid little victory dance. But instead of investigating that possibility, the Trump admin instead wants to investigate and purge anyone who leaked this information.

Now what kind of country am I reminded of when I consider a Chief Executive who seeks to purge and punish anyone who reveals possible criminal activity within his ambit?

 

[Mr Person]

Remember when you guys screamed "lock her up?"

It is....curious.


They don't seem to remember years of conservative media smearing the Obama admin/left, asking "unfair questions" of the same, the email server business, years of obstructing legislation and judicial appointments, so on and so forth. Apparently, we're supposed to form a queue to kiss Trump's ass and dare not question a thing that happens.

I suppose we dummies on the left just aren't bright enough to understand the rules.

 

[haymarket]

First it's not an election year. If this was 2020 and going on I am comfortable that at democratic nominee stops you would hear chants for the prosecution of Flynn.

Second Flynn got caught doing shady stuff abd he resigned/got fried relatively quickly. Hillary gets caught doing shady stuff then runs for senator as senator does shady stuff runs fur president gets consultation prise of Secretary of State. Does shady stuff as SOS runs for president. If Flynn chooses to try and continue a political career and runs for higher offices once again i am comfortable in guessing you would hear lock him up or variations

Over 3.5 million democrats have gathered this year in open events. Nobody chanting anything about locking Flynn up.

 

[TheFinalWord]

"Shadow government" = people who realize this guy is a dangerous loose cannon and are doing what they can to rein him in.

The problem is we don't know if they are making good decisions or not. It all looks political to me. Un-elected bureaucrats should not be able to thwart the American election process.

 

[Excon]

It was not illegal to use a private server at that time. The Bush admin did it too. After Hillary did it, then it became illegal.

And? Why are you creating a strawman?

What I pointed out is what was said in regards to her handling of classified information. You know, that stuff she even lied about.

 

[Astonished]

And? Why are you creating a strawman?

What I pointed out is what was said in regards to her handling of classified information. You know, that stuff she even lied about.

Why are you and Trump still talking about Hillary?

Why is Trump using an unsecured cell phone?

 

[Excon]

Why are you and Trump still talking about Hillary?

Now you are deflecting after you were shown to be wrong. Figures.

And your deflection attempt is totally lame.
I pointed out what another said was wrong.
You jumping in on that carried it even further.

 

[Astonished]

Now you are deflecting after you were shown to be wrong. Figures.

And your deflection attempt is totally lame.
I pointed out what another said was wrong.
You jumping in on that carried it even further.

When you start discussing me instead of the issue, it's obvious you have no leg to stand on in a debate.

 

[Excon]

When you start discussing me instead of the issue, it's obvious you have no leg to stand on in a debate.

iLOL
Hilarious.

Your actions are relevant here.

1. You are projecting.
2. You can't flip this. You were wrong.

Stop deflecting.