• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Heads on a pike...

Bullseye said:
Makes me wonder what threats the Dems have issued for Dem Senators voting for Trump. :cool:

That said I'd venture there will be as many or more GOPers voting for conviction as there will be Dems voting against.
Click to expand...

Maybe you can find that threat. Or just do as republicans do and fabricate it as another one of y'alls conspiracy theories and someone will go shoot up a pizza shop or something.
 
Last edited:
Hypothetical said:
who is "POTUS CONFIDANT"?

i don't know of anyone named POTUS CONFIDANT... that's a pretty strange name.
Click to expand...

A PELOSI CONFIDANT told me the POTUS CONFIDANT for this story is Jim Acosta.
 
poweRob said:
Maybe you can find that threat. Or just do as republicans do and fabricate it as another one of y'alls another conspiracy theories and someone will go shoot up a pizza shop or something.
Click to expand...

We already saw Maddow and Matthews cleverly doing to to Feinstein.
 
joko104 said:
A PELOSI CONFIDANT told me the POTUS CONFIDANT for this story is Jim Acosta.
Click to expand...

oh my, well if it's that dude, this really is a non story isn't it?
 
tres borrachos said:
You're right. It's jury tampering. A felony.
Click to expand...

They aren't a jury either. They are politically elected officials. They are closer to being a judge than anything else but they aren't fully that either.
 
Fishking said:
They aren't a jury either. They are politically elected officials. They are closer to being a judge than anything else but they aren't fully that either.
Click to expand...

They are the jury in the impeachment trial.

Or are you saying they are just ignoring the fact that they are the jury and have the vote?
 
tres borrachos said:
Then what are they, counselor? And who is the jury that decides on the verdict?
Click to expand...

they VOTE on a verdict and the impeachment process is political, meaning that if you don't have evidence enough to get a non partisan vote in your favor, you typically can't remove a president.
 
Hypothetical said:
they VOTE on a verdict and the impeachment process is political, meaning that if you don't have evidence enough to get a non partisan vote in your favor, you typically can't remove a president.
Click to expand...

Um, derp...thanks for posting about removing the President and evidence.

Is the group deciding his fate the Senate? Yes they are. Therefore they are the jury, and they shouldn't be tampered with. But I don't expect any citizen of Trump Fan Nation to admit that on here. It would get you booted from the Club.
 
tres borrachos said:
Then what are they, counselor? And who is the jury that decides on the verdict?
Click to expand...

You already quoted my answer before asking this question. Did you forget in that 1 minute? That's special.
 
tres borrachos said:
As usual, that poster doesn't know what he's talking about.

The idiotic Republican primary voters gave us Trump. Not the Democrats. I know this because I voted as a Republican in the NH primary in 2016, where there were 16 names on the ballot, most of them good people (the only real other POS was Mike Huckabee). I didn't vote for Trump. I voted for Rubio. Too bad there are retards here in New Hampshire who thought Trump was cool because he talked **** about Mexicans and Muslims - two major problems in our little state that borders Canada.:roll:

The Republicans gave us Trump. These morons deserve the crap he heaps on them, but not the rest of us.
Click to expand...

I can live with our mistakes as long as they operate within the constitution and their oath.

It seems Trump has been unable to do that and finally got caught.

I hope enough people are following the trial to assimilate that into their 2020 votes. I don't have much confidence that senate republicans will live up to their oaths.
 
tres borrachos said:
Um, derp...thanks for posting about removing the President and evidence.

Is the group deciding his fate the Senate? Yes they are. Therefore they are the jury, and they shouldn't be tampered with. But I don't expect any citizen of Trump Fan Nation to admit that on here. It would get you booted from the Club.
Click to expand...

so who's the source of this diabolical plot? I sure would like to know which Trump Confidant is the source of this crap before I make a decision on whether it has ANY merit at all.
 
poweRob said:
Then they are judges. And trump admin just used intimidation tactics on 53 judges. Dance away.
Click to expand...

Only little bitches are intimidated by it.
 
Hypothetical said:
so who's the source of this diabolical plot? I sure would like to know which Trump Confidant is the source of this crap before I make a decision on whether it has ANY merit at all.
Click to expand...

Diabolical plot? I think you stumbled into the wrong thread.
 
Fishking said:
You already quoted my answer before asking this question. Did you forget in that 1 minute? That's special.
Click to expand...

"Not that either" isn't the answer.

Who delivers the verdict at the end of the impeachment trial? Hint. It isn't Ivanka and Junior. It isn't you. It isn't me. I'll give you a few guesses.
 
tres borrachos said:
Diabolical plot? I think you stumbled into the wrong thread.
Click to expand...

what? you don't think that this is another diabolical plot by Donald J. ?

i'm just trying to go with the flow you guys have started.

I notice there was no attempt to answer my question.
 
Fishking said:
Only little bitches are intimidated by it.
Click to expand...

That makes 53 little bitches then. And it doesn't matter if they were intimidated or not... The attempt itself is illegal.
 
tres borrachos said:
"Not that either" isn't the answer.

Who delivers the verdict at the end of the impeachment trial? Hint. It isn't Ivanka and Junior. It isn't you. It isn't me. I'll give you a few guesses.
Click to expand...

Wow...the stupidity of this post burns. You literally quoted the answer 1 minute prior to that.
 
poweRob said:
That makes 53 of them then. And it doesn't matter if they were intimidated or not... The attempt itself is illegal.
Click to expand...

What? You're saying that politicians pressuring each other for a desired outcome is illegal? ****in-A...lock every single one of them up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom