- Joined
- Jun 11, 2009
- Messages
- 19,657
- Reaction score
- 8,454
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
I was reading today about the lawyer who defended Prop 8 planning his daughter's same sex wedding. It has struck me that even on this forum there have been some people who have moved on this issue. Some were opposed to any legal recognition and now consider civil unions to be a fair option. Others recognize a civil marriage as different from a religious marriage and now can accept it under those terms.
So have you evolved on this issue? If so, what led you to change your mind? If not, then what do you think of those who have moved on this issue?
I was reading today about the lawyer who defended Prop 8 planning his daughter's same sex wedding. It has struck me that even on this forum there have been some people who have moved on this issue. Some were opposed to any legal recognition and now consider civil unions to be a fair option. Others recognize a civil marriage as different from a religious marriage and now can accept it under those terms.
So have you evolved on this issue? If so, what led you to change your mind? If not, then what do you think of those who have moved on this issue?
I was reading today about the lawyer who defended Prop 8 planning his daughter's same sex wedding. It has struck me that even on this forum there have been some people who have moved on this issue. Some were opposed to any legal recognition and now consider civil unions to be a fair option. Others recognize a civil marriage as different from a religious marriage and now can accept it under those terms.
So have you evolved on this issue? If so, what led you to change your mind? If not, then what do you think of those who have moved on this issue?
Nope. I have never seen any reason why same sex couples should be denied equality under the law.
....
I was reading today about the lawyer who defended Prop 8 planning his daughter's same sex wedding. It has struck me that even on this forum there have been some people who have moved on this issue. Some were opposed to any legal recognition and now consider civil unions to be a fair option. Others recognize a civil marriage as different from a religious marriage and now can accept it under those terms.
So have you evolved on this issue? If so, what led you to change your mind? If not, then what do you think of those who have moved on this issue?
Perhaps my opinions on the issues relating to homosexuality have "evolved" over the years. Having had a great uncle who moved in with his boyfriend in the 1920s and lived with him till he died, having had a homosexual friend of my father's from Harvard to babysit my brother and myself and having had bisexual close friends at school and university I have been very easy with same sex relationships. I never understood the upset that others had with the thing.
Over the past years, however, a note of displeasure, an evolution if you like, has crept into my feelings on the matter. I dislike exhibitionism and do not think that free sex need be supported by the state from other people's taxes. So I am still fine with the guy banging guys and the girls banging girls or whatever. But I find the liberation movement has gone too far and is, causing backlash.
I've actually reversed my opinion slightly on it. For a long time, I was pretty neutral and thought "if it happens, cool - no biggie". Then I get exposed to vocal gay members here. My mood then sours on the subject.
I was reading today about the lawyer who defended Prop 8 planning his daughter's same sex wedding. It has struck me that even on this forum there have been some people who have moved on this issue. Some were opposed to any legal recognition and now consider civil unions to be a fair option. Others recognize a civil marriage as different from a religious marriage and now can accept it under those terms.
So have you evolved on this issue? If so, what led you to change your mind? If not, then what do you think of those who have moved on this issue?
So you were perfectly fine with gay people, then you had a negative interaction with someone on a discussion board and decided maybe its okay to discriminate agaisnt all gay people? Something doesn't quite jibe there. There are many people here I strongly disagree with, but it never occured to me that maybe it's okay to deprive them of fundamental human rights.
So you were perfectly fine with gay people, then you had a negative interaction with someone on a discussion board and decided maybe its okay to discriminate agaisnt all gay people? Something doesn't quite jibe there. There are many people here I strongly disagree with, but it never occured to me that maybe it's okay to deprive them of fundamental human rights.
Over the past years, however, a note of displeasure, an evolution if you like, has crept into my feelings on the matter. I dislike exhibitionism and do not think that free sex need be supported by the state from other people's taxes. So I am still fine with the guy banging guys and the girls banging girls or whatever. But I find the liberation movement has gone too far and is, causing backlash.
I was reading today about the lawyer who defended Prop 8 planning his daughter's same sex wedding. It has struck me that even on this forum there have been some people who have moved on this issue. Some were opposed to any legal recognition and now consider civil unions to be a fair option. Others recognize a civil marriage as different from a religious marriage and now can accept it under those terms.
So have you evolved on this issue? If so, what led you to change your mind? If not, then what do you think of those who have moved on this issue?
Sounds like you are saying that it was okay as long as it was discreet and private or perhaps kept in the closet? If your problem is with "exhibitionism" and "free sex", then that applies equally to gay and stright people, and especially to the sexual revolution of the 70s. And do you think that state should not support marriage in general? Or is it only same-sex marriage that should not be supported by the state?
I'm surprised at the commenters who used to be ok with gay equality but are souring on the idea now, apparently because gay people are now more visible and speaking out for their rights.
It is not a "fundamental human right". In addition, I wasn't aware of how gay people are when it's all stripped to bare bones. When I've seen some gay people in real life, I've seen them as everyone else - people with myriad thoughts, aspirations, viewpoints, goals, fears, etc. On here, the majority of openly gay people only have one goal and one opinion. They're not complete people, and I suggest they get professional help before marriage is ever a possibility.
So marriage is only a fundamental human right if you are heterosexual? Or does no one have the right to marry? In any case, your bias is quite apparent. You could have equally made the same claim that anti-gay rights folks have one goal and one opinion, are not complete people, and need professional help. Of course this is not true in either case.
I was reading today about the lawyer who defended Prop 8 planning his daughter's same sex wedding. It has struck me that even on this forum there have been some people who have moved on this issue. Some were opposed to any legal recognition and now consider civil unions to be a fair option. Others recognize a civil marriage as different from a religious marriage and now can accept it under those terms.
So have you evolved on this issue? If so, what led you to change your mind? If not, then what do you think of those who have moved on this issue?
I've actually reversed my opinion slightly on it. For a long time, I was pretty neutral and thought "if it happens, cool - no biggie".
Then I get exposed to vocal gay members here.
My mood then sours on the subject.
So you were perfectly fine with gay people, then you had a negative interaction with someone on a discussion board and decided maybe its okay to discriminate agaisnt all gay people? Something doesn't quite jibe there. There are many people here I strongly disagree with, but it never occured to me that maybe it's okay to deprive them of fundamental human rights.
Same-sex marriage is not a fundamental human right.
It makes perfect sense to me, in that everything must cater to him
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?