- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018
- Messages
- 54,813
- Reaction score
- 51,699
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
What's stopping you?
You flatter me.
What's stopping you?
I do hate to have to correct you, but:
plagiarize verb
pla·gia·rize | \ ˈplā-jə-ˌrīz also -jē-ə- \
plagiarized; plagiarizing
Definition of plagiarize
transitive verb
: to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (another's production) without crediting the source
intransitive verb
: to commit literary theft : present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source (Plagiarizing | Definition of Plagiarizing by Merriam-Webster)
Context is important. The O/P gave credit to someone else for writing the piece while posting a few of the author's quotes.
You flatter me.
He did not credit the source. He credited "someone else" as you said. Do you think that would pass a peer review on a paper being published? Do you think a teacher would accept that as an excuse in school? "I said it came from someone else. It was obvious to me who it came from."
Too tough a question for you to honestly answer, huh?
You want to point your finger at "white people with the privilege", point the other four right back at yourself.
Saw this earlier today and all I could say was damn, he nailed it.
A little later:
and finally:
Not going to provide a link, other than to confirm it is from a right leaning site (not the leftie loonies favorite boogieman, Townhall, however).
ETA: "whatabouttrump" responses will be ridicules, laughed at, or ignored - depending on their "merit".
You are confused. He did not take the source as his own which is the dictionary definition of plagiarism.
Indeed, but I don't support the violent repression. And I will vote against it. I hope you will join me.
Saw this earlier today and all I could say was damn, he nailed it.
A little later:
and finally:
Not going to provide a link, other than to confirm it is from a right leaning site (not the leftie loonies favorite boogieman, Townhall, however).
ETA: "whatabouttrump" responses will be ridicules, laughed at, or ignored - depending on their "merit".
Worse. You've been accused of plagiarism, taking the author's words as your own even though you already mentioned the words are not your own...:lol:
Of course they enabled it... Remember her?
“If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” Maxine Waters
Yes, I Do and How there were supporters who... actually carried out her orders!
Plus, all of those follow up Democrat/Socialist Party Representatives... Who are also enablers just like Representative Waters.
Democrat Representative Maxine Waters put the “Idea” out in the Public Square for all Democrat/Socialists supporters...
Not only to hear that “Idea” but she also gave them permission based on her position of Authority as A Democratic Leader to take action in the Public Square.
And those supporters acted.
And, those supporters... slowly but surely added multiple forms of physical aggression to back up their words thus...
Hoping to increase the fear factor in anybody who was not in lockstep with their Democratic/Socialist Agenda to Transform America.
Followed up by blaming the opposition party for the chaos in the streets. (By Any Means Necessary) (The End Justifies The Means)
MOTTO: “No Justice No Peace”
imho Roseann
Link #1 has no quotes of anyone denying antifa's existence and link #2 specifically says he was talking about the myth of violence in Portland by Antifa, not the existence of Antifa.
Are you intentionally this dishonest or did you just not read your links. Show proof that any Democrat denies the existence of Antifa, as you claimed.
Yes, I Do and How there were supporters who... actually carried out her orders!
Plus, all of those follow up Democrat/Socialist Party Representatives... Who are also enablers just like Representative Waters.
Democrat Representative Maxine Waters put the “Idea” out in the Public Square for all Democrat/Socialists supporters...
Not only to hear that “Idea” but she also gave them permission based on her position of Authority as A Democratic Leader to take action in the Public Square.
And those supporters acted.
And, those supporters... slowly but surely added multiple forms of physical aggression to back up their words thus...
Hoping to increase the fear factor in anybody who was not in lockstep with their Democratic/Socialist Agenda to Transform America.
Followed up by blaming the opposition party for the chaos in the streets. (By Any Means Necessary) (The End Justifies The Means)
MOTTO: “No Justice No Peace”
imho Roseann
I read my links... when asked about Antifa, Nadler said it was myth.
When congress was asked about the existence of Antifa... they did their usual obfuscating routine.
Maybe it was the "Summer of Love" in Seattle that confused you. Or all the "peaceful demonstrations that Trump's "stormtroopers" cause has got you puzzled?Your entire point is based on a falsehood, namely that the Dems created any of this, nothing than more lies someone is feeding you, and you bought it. So you posted one big nothing burger.
Thanks for demonstrating why I chose not to.At least attribute the crazy blog you are reading: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/08/the_democrats_face_the_inferno_they_created.html
Saw this earlier today and all I could say was damn, he nailed it.
A little later:
and finally:
Not going to provide a link, other than to confirm it is from a right leaning site (not the leftie loonies favorite boogieman, Townhall, however).
ETA: "whatabouttrump" responses will be ridicules, laughed at, or ignored - depending on their "merit".
It's personal and it's scary. This isn't like watching Baltimore burn after Freddy Gray. The left's anarcho-communist violence can be ANYWHERE. NO ONE IS SAFE.The plan was that this rioting would come back on Trump like it did Obama. Trump, however, has vigorously opposed it instead of "understood but opposed" it. Combine that with the fact that people have now seen more of their fair share of stupid, obnoxious, violent, destructive rioting over stuff that pretty much always turns out different than the way it's first promoted and the Democrats are getting LOTS of backlash.
It's personal and it's scary. This isn't like watching Baltimore burn after Freddy Gray. The left's anarcho-communist violence can be ANYWHERE. NO ONE IS SAFE.
And we have Trump on the record condemning the violence, burning, looting and killing the whole time!
This isn't going to hurt Trump. He's maintained discipline of message and actions, and no matter how far Democrats are willing to let their cities and towns burn to the ground, Trump has not and will not cross the line. Of course, that's been their goal, but Trump will not give them their Kent State narrative.
Democrats were sure Trump would act so that they could accuse him of killing Americans, but now they find themselves to blame for the daily horrors being perpetrated by their jackboots, all across the country.
I read my links... when asked about Antifa, Nadler said it was myth.
When congress was asked about the existence of Antifa... they did their usual obfuscating routine.
Maybe it was the "Summer of Love" in Seattle that confused you. Or all the "peaceful demonstrations that Trump's "stormtroopers" cause has got you puzzled?