• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Have the Dems created a monster they can't control?

I do hate to have to correct you, but:

plagiarize verb

pla·​gia·​rize | \ ˈplā-jə-ˌrīz also -jē-ə- \
plagiarized; plagiarizing
Definition of plagiarize
transitive verb

: to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (another's production) without crediting the source
intransitive verb

: to commit literary theft : present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source (Plagiarizing | Definition of Plagiarizing by Merriam-Webster)​

Context is important. The O/P gave credit to someone else for writing the piece while posting a few of the author's quotes. He did NOT pass the author's words off as his own. Stop lying.

Read your dictionary definition again.
: to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (another's production) without crediting the source
intransitive verb
 
Context is important. The O/P gave credit to someone else for writing the piece while posting a few of the author's quotes.

He did not credit the source. He credited "someone else" as you said. Do you think that would pass a peer review on a paper being published? Do you think a teacher would accept that as an excuse in school? "I said it came from someone else. It was obvious to me who it came from."
 
You flatter me.

Too tough a question for you to honestly answer, huh?

You want to point your finger at "white people with the privilege", point the other four right back at yourself.
 
He did not credit the source. He credited "someone else" as you said. Do you think that would pass a peer review on a paper being published? Do you think a teacher would accept that as an excuse in school? "I said it came from someone else. It was obvious to me who it came from."

You are confused. He did not take the source as his own which is the dictionary definition of plagiarism.
 
Too tough a question for you to honestly answer, huh?

You want to point your finger at "white people with the privilege", point the other four right back at yourself.

Indeed, but I don't support the violent repression. And I will vote against it. I hope you will join me.
 
Saw this earlier today and all I could say was damn, he nailed it.



A little later:



and finally:



Not going to provide a link, other than to confirm it is from a right leaning site (not the leftie loonies favorite boogieman, Townhall, however).

ETA: "whatabouttrump" responses will be ridicules, laughed at, or ignored - depending on their "merit".

Worse. You've been accused of plagiarism, taking the author's words as your own even though you already mentioned the words are not your own...:lol:
 
Indeed, but I don't support the violent repression. And I will vote against it. I hope you will join me.

You insult your fellow Americans that you assume support repression.

Says a lot about your intellect.
 
Saw this earlier today and all I could say was damn, he nailed it.



A little later:



and finally:



Not going to provide a link, other than to confirm it is from a right leaning site (not the leftie loonies favorite boogieman, Townhall, however).

ETA: "whatabouttrump" responses will be ridicules, laughed at, or ignored - depending on their "merit".

Your entire point is based on a falsehood, namely that the Dems created any of this, nothing than more lies someone is feeding you, and you bought it. So you posted one big nothing burger.
 
Worse. You've been accused of plagiarism, taking the author's words as your own even though you already mentioned the words are not your own...:lol:

I am not the only one who sees it as plagiarism. Grammarly also detects it.

PlagiarismGrammarly.jpg


There is also MIT's interpretation of plagiarism:

How do I show I am quoting?
  • Name the source in an introductory phrase.
  • Use quotation marks or indent long quotations.
  • Cite the source appropriately.

If you fail to do this, it is plagiarism (Avoiding Plagiarism - Quoting | Academic Integrity at MIT.).​
 
Last edited:
Of course they enabled it... Remember her?
“If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” Maxine Waters

Yes, I Do and How there were supporters who... actually carried out her orders!

Plus, all of those follow up Democrat/Socialist Party Representatives... Who are also enablers just like Representative Waters.

Democrat Representative Maxine Waters put the “Idea” out in the Public Square for all Democrat/Socialists supporters...

Not only to hear that “Idea” but she also gave them permission based on her position of Authority as A Democratic Leader to take action in the Public Square.

And those supporters acted.

And, those supporters... slowly but surely added multiple forms of physical aggression to back up their words thus...

Hoping to increase the fear factor in anybody who was not in lockstep with their Democratic/Socialist Agenda to Transform America.

Followed up by blaming the opposition party for the chaos in the streets. (By Any Means Necessary) (The End Justifies The Means)

MOTTO: “No Justice No Peace”


imho Roseann:)
 
Yes, I Do and How there were supporters who... actually carried out her orders!

Plus, all of those follow up Democrat/Socialist Party Representatives... Who are also enablers just like Representative Waters.

Democrat Representative Maxine Waters put the “Idea” out in the Public Square for all Democrat/Socialists supporters...

Not only to hear that “Idea” but she also gave them permission based on her position of Authority as A Democratic Leader to take action in the Public Square.

And those supporters acted.

And, those supporters... slowly but surely added multiple forms of physical aggression to back up their words thus...

Hoping to increase the fear factor in anybody who was not in lockstep with their Democratic/Socialist Agenda to Transform America.

Followed up by blaming the opposition party for the chaos in the streets. (By Any Means Necessary) (The End Justifies The Means)

MOTTO: “No Justice No Peace”


imho Roseann:)

Good title for a book.... 'The New Get in Your Face Democratic Party-By any Means Necessary' ;)
 
Link #1 has no quotes of anyone denying antifa's existence and link #2 specifically says he was talking about the myth of violence in Portland by Antifa, not the existence of Antifa.

Are you intentionally this dishonest or did you just not read your links. Show proof that any Democrat denies the existence of Antifa, as you claimed.

I read my links... when asked about Antifa, Nadler said it was myth.
When congress was asked about the existence of Antifa... they did their usual obfuscating routine.
 
Yes, I Do and How there were supporters who... actually carried out her orders!

Plus, all of those follow up Democrat/Socialist Party Representatives... Who are also enablers just like Representative Waters.

Democrat Representative Maxine Waters put the “Idea” out in the Public Square for all Democrat/Socialists supporters...

Not only to hear that “Idea” but she also gave them permission based on her position of Authority as A Democratic Leader to take action in the Public Square.

And those supporters acted.

And, those supporters... slowly but surely added multiple forms of physical aggression to back up their words thus...

Hoping to increase the fear factor in anybody who was not in lockstep with their Democratic/Socialist Agenda to Transform America.

Followed up by blaming the opposition party for the chaos in the streets. (By Any Means Necessary) (The End Justifies The Means)

MOTTO: “No Justice No Peace”


imho Roseann:)

Did you catch any of the Commitment March today? If the idea was to commemorate or build on MLK Jr's legacy I wasn't feeling it. What I saw was anger, grievance and bumper sticker slogans. I kind of felt bad for everyone out there who went to be uplifted and instead got MLK III and Sharpton telling them how screwed they were and how the only thing that could possibly save them was voting for a Democrat.
 
I read my links... when asked about Antifa, Nadler said it was myth.
When congress was asked about the existence of Antifa... they did their usual obfuscating routine.

Nadler said the violence in Portland was a myth. That is a direct quote from your own link. You didn't read it. So far you have provided no sources showing democrats denying the existence of Antifa.
 
Your entire point is based on a falsehood, namely that the Dems created any of this, nothing than more lies someone is feeding you, and you bought it. So you posted one big nothing burger.
Maybe it was the "Summer of Love" in Seattle that confused you. Or all the "peaceful demonstrations that Trump's "stormtroopers" cause has got you puzzled?
 
Saw this earlier today and all I could say was damn, he nailed it.



A little later:



and finally:



Not going to provide a link, other than to confirm it is from a right leaning site (not the leftie loonies favorite boogieman, Townhall, however).

ETA: "whatabouttrump" responses will be ridicules, laughed at, or ignored - depending on their "merit".

Well it's against the rules to post content without the cite, so had to report that one....

Did Chynah teach you to thieve on other's intellectual property or do you just not have manners?
 
The plan was that this rioting would come back on Trump like it did Obama. Trump, however, has vigorously opposed it instead of "understood but opposed" it. Combine that with the fact that people have now seen more of their fair share of stupid, obnoxious, violent, destructive rioting over stuff that pretty much always turns out different than the way it's first promoted and the Democrats are getting LOTS of backlash.
It's personal and it's scary. This isn't like watching Baltimore burn after Freddy Gray. The left's anarcho-communist violence can be ANYWHERE. NO ONE IS SAFE.
And we have Trump on the record condemning the violence, burning, looting and killing the whole time!

This isn't going to hurt Trump. He's maintained discipline of message and actions, and no matter how far Democrats are willing to let their cities and towns burn to the ground, Trump has not and will not cross the line. Of course, that's been their goal, but Trump will not give them their Kent State narrative.

Democrats were sure Trump would act so that they could accuse him of killing Americans, but now they find themselves to blame for the daily horrors being perpetrated by their jackboots, all across the country.
 
It's personal and it's scary. This isn't like watching Baltimore burn after Freddy Gray. The left's anarcho-communist violence can be ANYWHERE. NO ONE IS SAFE.
And we have Trump on the record condemning the violence, burning, looting and killing the whole time!

This isn't going to hurt Trump. He's maintained discipline of message and actions, and no matter how far Democrats are willing to let their cities and towns burn to the ground, Trump has not and will not cross the line. Of course, that's been their goal, but Trump will not give them their Kent State narrative.

Democrats were sure Trump would act so that they could accuse him of killing Americans, but now they find themselves to blame for the daily horrors being perpetrated by their jackboots, all across the country.

They have created this stunningly false narrative about the guy and can't manage to back away from it or, perhaps, they really believe everything they have been telling themselves.
 
I read my links... when asked about Antifa, Nadler said it was myth.
When congress was asked about the existence of Antifa... they did their usual obfuscating routine.

Ted Cruz pointedly asked Maxie Hirono if she wanted to take the opportunity at the Antifa hearing in Congress, to denounce Antifa.
She declined.
 
Maybe it was the "Summer of Love" in Seattle that confused you. Or all the "peaceful demonstrations that Trump's "stormtroopers" cause has got you puzzled?

You are claiming that the Dems created the issue and cannot control it, they created nothing so your premise is still false. Period.
 
You are claiming that the Dems created the issue and cannot control it, they created nothing so your premise is still false. Period.

DNC recap.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom