Why would we want to help 1 child with cancer? Really?
Wow
excellent question
pass the government budget and get on with caring for that child and every other aspect of government work
People 'will' love it. The party that pushes democracy sure does seem to push the idea that it's ok to go against the will of people today because people 'will' support it in the future a lot. I can't help but find that pretty entertaining.
Oh I know, piss on that cancer ridden child, you've got government workers with their own problems...:roll:
and by failing to pass a budget the GOP is effectively pissing on that cancer plagued child
Why would we want to help 1 child with cancer? Really?
??? You're confused.
The House passed a budget, the Senate is the one who has failed.
No, not really
Reid never said such a thing. The only new low being hit is the lie you're trying to push in this thread.
Yes, he actually did. You're trying to play a game saying that he didn't say what he said when he said what he said answering in the context of what was asked.
no it is you who is confused
probably watching too much propaganda on faux news
if the house passed a budget to fund government operations, the senate would approve it and Obama would not veto it
what we have is the teabaggers in congress holding people, like the cancer suffering child, hostage, to try to do by 'starve the beast' methods, what they were unable to achieve legislatively
but then someone has to be willing to look at the big picture and forgo the faux news propaganda to get it
You are lying.
People 'will' love it. The party that pushes democracy sure does seem to push the idea that it's ok to go against the will of people today because people 'will' support it in the future a lot. I can't help but find that pretty entertaining.
I personally despise Harry Reid but I have watched this 3 times and this is tampering with context, not a wish for 1 child to die.
Besides, aren't we supposed to be spending too much money? We could save millions by not doing these clinical trials. Shouldn't that be left to the "private sector"? What does the USG know about cancer anyway?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?