HAMAS claimed the hospital was directly struck
by an air strike.
We
watched a rocket be fired by Palestinians, misfire, and strike the parking lot outside. This was confirmed by multiple outside nations, NGO observers, and every single satellite imagery provider in the world.
You claimed no one had said so except Israel. This was incorrect.
You claimed we had no way to know. This was incorrect.
Now you are suggesting it was a .... black flag op?
Entertainingly, the very article that first ran it
The argument put forth was:
- Israel (like all nation states) tries to keep track of who is in the terrorist groups that target it
- Israel had been able to match 17% of the confirmed dead thus far with names of people who it was tracking as being members of HAMAS
- Ergo, 83% of the casualties are civilians
The problem of course being that:
- Israel (like all nation states) is not an omniscient all-knowing God with perfect insight into who is on the payroll of groups that hate it
- All casualties are not known by name
- All casualties are not confirmed
So, instead of being - what it was, in fact - a story about a rather impressive granular-level ability to put together who was who in HAMAS during conventional combat operations..... it became a story pushing a narrative that fell apart as soon as someone pointed out that it was logically incoherent. It's like looking at a bunker full of dead germans on the beach of Normandy and deciding "
Welp, unless we happen to recognize their faces and know their first names, all these chaps in Wehrmacht uniforms must be civilians". All it took was someone to stop for more than 30 seconds and read it critically.
That, of course, didn't stop it from getting picked up and repeated ad-nauseum by the anti-Israeli western press, who aren't so concerned about "facts" as they are The Narrative.