It is clearly a waste to get someone who endorses the actions of Hamas to understand that Israel perceives, rightly, an existential threat from any group that has a sworn goal to eliminate Jews from the Middle East.
What are you talking about? Let's stick to non-fiction.
He is not rewriting history to begin with.
Yep. Israel doesn't start the fights, but they sure do finish them.
Everything that I said is still true.
Justified self defense.
Justified self defense.
If Gazans dislike wars with Israel, my advice to them is to stop starting them.
Yes it is.
Justified self defense.
Justified self defense.
If Gazans dislike war with Israel, my advice to them is to stop starting wars with Israel.
No. Just more facts and reality.
Everything that I say is true. That is why no one can point out anything untrue in my posts.
Wrong again. Everything that I say is true in reality.
Fake news. No such occupation.
Indigenous Jews are not colonizers. The only colonizers in Israel are Muslims.
Indigenous Jews are not interlopers. The only interlopers in Israel are Muslims.
Falsely accusing Israel of genocide means that Israel now gets to keep the West Bank all to themselves.
Your explanation is bogus. The West Bank belongs to Israel now because of the false accusations of genocide.
Except that is not what the Palestinians are doing.
No such violation.
Nope. Just more facts.
The goal is for Jews to live peacefully in their ancient homeland.
Nonsense. The mass rapes were widely reported by the media.
Likewise, you have no actual knowledge that the Palestinian "death toll" is even remotely true.
None of this has any relevance. They have zero jurisdiction over Israel. We have been over this numerous times.Uh….no, it isn’t. These rulings have been handed down for decades. And there is nothing “vague” about their rulings.
“In 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) found in an advisory opinion that Israel's occupation was illegal and ruled that Israel had "an obligation to cease immediately all new settlement activities and to evacuate all settlers" from the occupied territories.”
“In Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (2004), the ICJ found that Israel's settlements and the then-nascent Israeli West Bank barrier were both in violation of international law; part of the latter has been constructed within the West Bank, as opposed to being entirely on Israel's side of the Green Line.”
The UN has repeatedly upheld the view that Israel's construction of settlements in the occupied territories constitutes a violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention.
“The consensus of the international community – the vast majority of states, the overwhelming majority of legal experts, the International Court of Justice and the UN – is that settlements are in violation of international law.
After the Six-Day War, in 1967, Theodor Meron, legal counsel to the Israeli Foreign Ministry stated in a legal opinion to the Prime Minister,
This legal opinion was sent to Prime Minister Levi Eshkol. However, it was not made public at the time. The Labor cabinet allowed settlements despite the warning. This paved the way for future settlement growth. In 2007, Meron stated that "I believe that I would have given the same opinion today."
Israeli settlement - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
“Security reasons” don’t allow you immunity from international law either. That argument has already been rejected by the international community.
The Palestinians have no obligation to accept the illegal Israeli colonization of their land, actually.
International law doesn’t go away just because a country refuses to recognize it.
I think @snakestretcher inadvertently has provided a defense for the Israeli attitudes toward survival. Imagine living for 80 years with terrorist attacks, six full-blown wars with Arab countries (not counting Gaza), missiles and rockets, and threat of nuclear attack from Iran.
All of what I wrote is irrefutable historical fact. Educate yourself, or continue being in denial.
Nobody is endorsing Hamas. Please explain how a country with the most powerful military in the region is under "existential threat" from a small group of armed militants. The premise is risible.
I'm not here to pander to your petty demands. My position is clear; I support neither Israel nor Hamas. I do support the right of the Palestinian populace to have their own, sovereign state, just as Israel has, but which Israel is adamant won't ever happen. You can go now.:snorts:
Uh-huh.
So. Are you ready to acknowledge the widespread rape on Oct 7th, and that the al-Ahli Hospital was hit by a malfunctioning Palestinian rocket instead of (as HAMAS claimed) an IDF aerial strike?
You have not. Instead you insisted that all of a sudden no one could know anything, a position you then immediately abandoned in order to launch accusations
So. Are you ready to acknowledge the widespread rape on Oct 7th, and that the al-Ahli Hospital was hit by a malfunctioning Palestinian rocket instead of (as HAMAS claimed) an IDF aerial strike?
No doubt.
Quit trolling. You're not very good at it.
Incorrect.
Prove me wrong. You can't; all you have is blind denial. Again:
www.palestine-studies.org
Yes, rapes happened. Nobody denies that because evidence exists; 'babies beheaded', a propaganda lie, never happened. Happy now? Are you ready to concede that the IDF has also committed rapes and numerous war crimes? Let's see how far your honesty extends.
www.lemonde.fr
www.declassifieduk.org
I suspect this is advice you should take for yourself. I'm not interested in your namecalling.
