• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Guys who need 30 and 100 round mags need to ask why do they need that

I don't own a gun, but I remain unconvinced that any attempts to restrict them will work unless we're talking a constitutional amendment, at this point.

I also am not convinced that doing so will actually help anyone except perhaps the politicians who take sides on it.

Edit: You might even call me a pro-2nd amendment progressive.
There's more of us than you might think.
Yes there are some progressives and liberals who are for gun rights but they are far and few between.
 
I don't own a gun, but I remain unconvinced that any attempts to restrict them will work unless we're talking a constitutional amendment, at this point.

I also am not convinced that doing so will actually help anyone except perhaps the politicians who take sides on it.

Edit: You might even call me a pro-2nd amendment progressive.
There's more of us than you might think.
You won’t see any politician truly pushing repealing 2A, it would be political suicide. Besides if they repeal it then that’s one less major false flag talking point for the Dem gun grabbers. Better for Dems to have 2A in their back pockets as talking points then to actually repeal it. Had two years of Dem control over govco and no repeal, would be no better time then now….but no, gotta keep that one in their back pockets. Same with tax the rich. And their minions eat it up.

71EBCC9C-19D8-4550-82E7-52D504AF13DB.webp
 
You won’t see any politician truly pushing repealing 2A, it would be political suicide. Besides if they repeal it then that’s one less major false flag talking point for the Dem gun grabbers. Better for Dems to have 2A in their back pockets as talking points then to actually repeal it. Had two years of Dem control over govco and no repeal, would be no better time then now….but no, gotta keep that one in their back pockets. Same with tax the rich. And their minions eat it up.
14atbe.webp
 
You won’t see any politician truly pushing repealing 2A, it would be political suicide. Besides if they repeal it then that’s one less major false flag talking point for the Dem gun grabbers. Better for Dems to have 2A in their back pockets as talking points then to actually repeal it. Had two years of Dem control over govco and no repeal, would be no better time then now….but no, gotta keep that one in their back pockets. Same with tax the rich. And their minions eat it up.

View attachment 67421965
That is not true. In 1993 the Democratic Party controlled Congress and the White House, just like today. That is when Democrat Representative Major R. Owens, from New York's 11th District proposed:

H.J.Res.81 - Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States repealing the Second Amendment to the Constitution.​


Democrat Senator Feinstein is also on record the following year, publicly stating that she supported a complete ban of all privately owned firearms.
 
You won’t see any politician truly pushing repealing 2A, it would be political suicide. Besides if they repeal it then that’s one less major false flag talking point for the Dem gun grabbers. Better for Dems to have 2A in their back pockets as talking points then to actually repeal it. Had two years of Dem control over govco and no repeal, would be no better time then now….but no, gotta keep that one in their back pockets. Same with tax the rich. And their minions eat it up.

View attachment 67421965
I vote for Democrats because they're less dangerous than the Republicans, not because they're a good option.
 
I don't approve of what they did but when Joe Biden gets more votes then there are registered voters in the country you know something is wrong.
Yes, the thing that is wrong is you. You made that up. It didn't happen.
Sure it did.

Now that is hilarious.

Deuce said you lied when you claimed that Biden got "more votes then [sic] there are registered voters" and the link you posted as a *gotcha* agrees that that claim is a LIE.



You didn't think this graphic meant "thumbs up, awesome claim", did you?

rating-false.png
 
Now that is hilarious.

Deuce said you lied when you claimed that Biden got "more votes then [sic] there are registered voters" and the link you posted as a *gotcha* agrees that that claim is a LIE.



You didn't think this graphic meant "thumbs up, awesome claim", did you?

rating-false.png
Right wingers lie about everything
 
Right wingers lie about everything

True.... but I still haven't gotten over the part where he went oh yeah, watch this, then posted a link proving he had lied. Too funny.
 
Uh huh and so far how many leftist filth judges has biden put on the court? The threat is real you say, no, it's perceived, incorrectly. If it were real, how come biden hasn't done it?
So trumps words even if not direct are enough for you to convict him for inciting followers to attack the capitol or seek a dictatorship lol yet when your leftist filth scumbag president says he is going to pack the Supreme Court in an effort to ban guns it’s my incorrect perception. What a pathetic hypocritical and completely moronic post.
 
True.... but I still haven't gotten over the part where he went oh yeah, watch this, then posted a link proving he had lied. Too funny.
I have to assume they just did a search for that and picked the best looking headline without even looking at the article.
 
So trumps words even if not direct are enough for you to convict him for inciting followers to attack the capitol or seek a dictatorship lol yet when your leftist filth scumbag president says he is going to pack the Supreme Court in an effort to ban guns it’s my incorrect perception. What a pathetic hypocritical and completely moronic post.
We all watched the effects of trump's words on january the sixth. How many new judges has biden's words installed on the supreme court?

Your vocabulary is impressive.
 
For every one person who encounters violent crime there are probably a hundred thousand who don't and yet gun folks make it sound like every day they go outside they are putting their life on the line when no such thing is occuring.
Hmmm so that's 10 out of 1,000,000 according to you? So what's with all the dumb-ass red flag laws? Really ten out of one million? It would be you guys screaming the sky is falling.
 
Hmmm so that's 10 out of 1,000,000 according to you? So what's with all the dumb-ass red flag laws? Really ten out of one million? It would be you guys screaming the sky is falling.
Who cares what the numbers are as long as it's not you getting killed is what it really comes down to.
 
Who cares what the numbers are as long as it's not you getting killed is what it really comes down to.
That's an argument for self defense.
 
We all watched the effects of trump's words on january the sixth. How many new judges has biden's words installed on the supreme court?

Your vocabulary is impressive.
The effects of trumps words are tremendous. They have leftist filth all eat up with the TDS. So while you blame trumps words for January 6th even though he specifically said to peacefully protest we understand it wasn’t his words. TDS caused you to perceive this in your head. Go peacefully protest doesn’t equal go violently protest no matter how hard you try.

Now your politician went on a debate stage saying that he would pack the court if necessary to ban guns among other things. He recently did this

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing...on-on-the-supreme-court-of-the-united-states/

So he says he’s gonna do it. He begins the process of doing it. Yet you can’t connect the dots lol.

And I don’t care if you don’t like my limited vocabulary. I have more common sense in my big toe than you have in you whole body.

And if someone tells me they are going to kill me I believe them. Openly saying what you are going to do is many many times more direct and obvious than trying to connect dots as you have done with trump. There are so few dots that you look like a TDS suffering conspiracy theorist.
 
Who cares what the numbers are as long as it's not you getting killed is what it really comes down to.
You seem pretty afraid, so get a firearm and learn how to use it. Are you frightened you might be that 1 in 400,000? That would be like winning the lottery.

Lets add perspective. U.S. population 333,276,824 (roughly) at 1 per 400,000 would come out to 33,327,682.4 (apx)
How many of those are self inflicted (suicide). How many are legal shootings by police and civilians? How many are gang related?
 
What a great argument... used by every totalitarian dictator throughout history.
Boo hoo hoo.
Yet it is still valid! 😁😂
 
You seem pretty afraid, so get a firearm and learn how to use it. Are you frightened you might be that 1 in 400,000? That would be like winning the lottery.

Lets add perspective. U.S. population 333,276,824 (roughly) at 1 per 400,000 would come out to 33,327,682.4 (apx)
How many of those are self inflicted (suicide). How many are legal shootings by police and civilians? How many are gang related?

I dunno. My math has his claim coming to only a little more than 800 violent crimes a year.
 
You seem pretty afraid, so get a firearm and learn how to use it. Are you frightened you might be that 1 in 400,000? That would be like winning the lottery.

Lets add perspective. U.S. population 333,276,824 (roughly) at 1 per 400,000 would come out to 33,327,682.4 (apx)
How many of those are self inflicted (suicide). How many are legal shootings by police and civilians? How many are gang related?
My uncle won floridas lottery about 25 years ago. 14,000,000 to 1 odds.

One in 20,000 chance of being murdered in the U.S.

One in 667 chance of being robbed every year.

The threat is real. It’s why I carry.

One in 15,300 chance of being struck by lightning in your lifetime in the US.

Now every leftist gun grabber would run off the golf course during a storm with those odds yet they call us paranoid for preparing against violent crime. Pathetic.
 
That is not true. In 1993 the Democratic Party controlled Congress and the White House, just like today. That is when Democrat Representative Major R. Owens, from New York's 11th District proposed:

H.J.Res.81 - Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States repealing the Second Amendment to the Constitution.​


Democrat Senator Feinstein is also on record the following year, publicly stating that she supported a complete ban of all privately owned firearms.

The only reason democrats dont push outright gun bans is because they know they would get demolished. The politicians want them banned...most Americans...even liberal gun owners...do not.
 
Back
Top Bottom