• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gun sales at record levels

Enola said:
I don't think regular citizens need to have assault weapons or machine guns…
Click to expand...

Has such a statement ever, in the entire course of human history, been made by someone who isn't far too abjectly ignorant of the subject to have even the faintest clue what an “assault weapon” is, and what characteristics distinguish it from a gun that isn't an “assault weapon”?
 
As a liberal, I am armed and ready to fight off the far, far, far right wing takeover of my beloved country.
 
TheDemSocialist said:
So which states can you not buy guns there at all?
Click to expand...

dishonest argument. That would be akin to someone answering a civil rights leader in the 50's saying "Whites don't have to ride on the back of the bus" so there is no discrimination in the south
 
Omgitsme said:
I think everyone should have to get a license to own a firearm. I also believe that if you wernt in the military or in law enforcement you should have to take a short gun safety course.
Click to expand...

that violates the constitution and serves no useful purpose (trying to hassle gun owners or restrict the right of honest people to own guns is pernicious, not useful)
 
It would be interesting to see if Hornady and KA-Bar have seen positive responses to the their Zombie marketing. I think it is kind of cool. Shooting is fun, why not have a little fun marketing. It follows the pink Lady Smith. At least I think Smith was the first to market a pink gun.
 
TurtleDude said:
dishonest argument. That would be akin to someone answering a civil rights leader in the 50's saying "Whites don't have to ride on the back of the bus" so there is no discrimination in the south
Click to expand...

You still havent answered the question. Are guns all in all banned anywhere in the US?
 
TheDemSocialist said:
You still havent answered the question. Are guns all in all banned anywhere in the US?
Click to expand...

changing the goal posts again because you have been pwned on this subject?
 
TurtleDude said:
changing the goal posts again because you have been pwned on this subject?
Click to expand...

No i have stuck to the same question over and over again, and you have yet to answer the question. You just say look at California etc. But you can still buy guns in California.
So please answer the question TD i have been asking sense my first post here.
Are guns all in all banned anywhere in the US?
 
TheDemSocialist said:
No i have stuck to the same question over and over again, and you have yet to answer the question. You just say look at California etc. But you can still buy guns in California.
So please answer the question TD i have been asking sense my first post here.
Are guns all in all banned anywhere in the US?
Click to expand...

I guess you didn't understand the point that most everyone else did. In the south whites had full rights and blacks did not but for a white to say there was not any infringement on civil liberties just because he didnt suffer persecution would be a lie. The fact is many areas in the USA INFRINGE on our rights by BANNING THE SALE OR POSSESSION OF COMMON FIREARMS that these same political entities SUPPLY to their CIVILIAN employees
 
Thunder said:
no, there is no place in the USA where all guns are banned.
Click to expand...

of course not-government agents have guns in areas where other civilians cannot possess them but that idiotic claim of yours has no relevance to this discussion. The fact remains that lefty democrats have precluded proper respect for the second amendment in some areas
 
TurtleDude said:
I guess you didn't understand the point that most everyone else did. In the south whites had full rights and blacks did not but for a white to say there was not any infringement on civil liberties just because he didnt suffer persecution would be a lie. The fact is many areas in the USA INFRINGE on our rights by BANNING THE SALE OR POSSESSION OF COMMON FIREARMS that these same political entities SUPPLY to their CIVILIAN employees
Click to expand...

So civil rights=gun rights?

"Common firearms"? What do you mean? You can still buy guns in California. They just have more strict laws... (You know the state rights?)...
 
TurtleDude said:
...The fact is many areas in the USA INFRINGE on our rights by BANNING THE SALE OR POSSESSION OF COMMON FIREARMS that these same political entities SUPPLY to their CIVILIAN employees
Click to expand...

many= a lot more than one.

the guns you describe are shotguns, bolt-action rifles, and average semi-auto handguns.

so, where are these MANY places in the USA that ban the sale & possession of such firearms?
 
TheDemSocialist said:
So civil rights=gun rights?

"Common firearms"? What do you mean? You can still buy guns in California. They just have more strict laws... (You know the state rights?)...
Click to expand...

MOre idiotic arguments. If I cannot buy or own EVERY single firearm make or type that I should be able to my rights are infringed upon as surely as if EVERY GUN is banned.
 
Thunder said:
many= a lot more than one.

the guns you describe are shotguns, bolt-action rifles, and average semi-auto handguns.

so, where are these MANY places in the USA that ban the sale & possession of such firearms?
Click to expand...

the stuff that the anti gun ninnies call "assault weapons" are common semi auto rifles, shotguns and handguns
 
TurtleDude said:
...The fact is many areas in the USA INFRINGE on our rights by BANNING THE SALE OR POSSESSION OF COMMON FIREARMS that these same political entities SUPPLY to their CIVILIAN employees
Click to expand...

again I ask: so, where are these MANY places in the USA that ban the sale & possession of such firearms?
 
Thunder said:
again I ask: so, where are these MANY places in the USA that ban the sale & possession of such firearms?
Click to expand...

People really get tired of stupid questions asked over and over by someone who ignores or doesn't read the answers provided.

I have already told you that there are several states and cities that ban the sale or possession of firearms every citizen should be able to own or buy
 
TurtleDude said:
MOre idiotic arguments. If I cannot buy or own EVERY single firearm make or type that I should be able to my rights are infringed upon as surely as if EVERY GUN is banned.
Click to expand...

So you think you should be able to own a grenade launcher?
So the answer to the question i have been asking is no? There is no where in the US where guns are banned entirely?
 
I love hearing news like this. It reminds me that the independent spirit that once made this country great is alive and well. Now if only people would turn off their tvs and educate themselves.
 
TurtleDude said:
...The fact is many areas in the USA INFRINGE on our rights by BANNING THE SALE OR POSSESSION OF COMMON FIREARMS that these same political entities SUPPLY to their CIVILIAN employees
Click to expand...

TurtleDude said:
...I have already told you that there are several states and cities that ban the sale or possession of firearms every citizen should be able to own or buy
Click to expand...

you're moving the goalposts, buddy.

not every firearm that police use should be available to the general public, including automatic weapons.
 
TheDemSocialist said:
So you think you should be able to own a grenade launcher?
So the answer to the question i have been asking is no? There is no where in the US where guns are banned entirely?
Click to expand...

Your ignorance of firearms is really hilarious

and your stupid question is just that. If a political subdivision bans EVEN ONE TYPE OF FIREARM that civilians should be able to own, then the law is wrong. one or a hundred, its a constitutional violation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom