• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gov. Noem tells NRA crowd that her 2 year old grandaughter already has firearms.

Honestly im not really sure what gauge it was. It was 40 years ago and it never really was my thing. I did it to humor my grandfather for a little while but it never stuck with me. I think it hurting so much had something to do with me not taking to it. Plus I didn't particularly like staying still in freezing snow waiting for something to happen. I don't have that kind of patience.
I think hunting is not really for everyone.
 
Hunting is beyond mental?

I never said that. Don't take my words out of context and put words in my mouth. If you are going to interact with me, have the courtesy to comment on what I actually said. Here's what I
said.


Gov Noem said in the video that she has a litle grandaughter who is almost two. She said she already has a shotgun and a rifle because "soon she will need them."

Her words.

That is beyond mental.

What almost two child needs a shotgun and a rifle because "soon they will need them."

How can anyone defend such idiocy.
 
So what did you mean that's beyond mental?
I can't believe that I'm having to explain, it was very clear in what I wrote.

It is beyond mental that anyone believes a two year old needs a shotgun and a rifle because "soon she will need them."

Anyone disagrees, fine, but don't attribute words to me that I never said.
 
I can't believe that I'm having to explain, it was very clear in what I wrote.
I think what you wrote is in mischaracterization of what happened.
It is beyond mental that anyone believes a two year old needs a shotgun and a rifle because "soon she will need them."
well if you're going to start doing shooting sports then yes you do need something of that nature how else would you do it,?
Anyone disagrees, fine, but don't attribute words to me that I never said.
I need an electrical lead or a gas hose in order to weld properly I don't need one I like I won't die without it but in order to do the job I need it.

Did you seriously think she meant that she would die without it? I think you're placing meaning on something that isn't there and that's why you're having to explain it.

It's not based on what she said it's based on what you were thinking
 
I think what you wrote is in mischaracterization of what happened.
well if you're going to start doing shooting sports then yes you do need something of that nature how else would you do it,?
I need an electrical lead or a gas hose in order to weld properly I don't need one I like I won't die without it but in order to do the job I need it.

Did you seriously think she meant that she would die without it? I think you're placing meaning on something that isn't there and that's why you're having to explain it.

It's not based on what she said it's based on what you were thinking
I'm having to explain it because apparently at least two people here are unable or willing to comprehend simple sentences.

I'm not going around in circles with you. I've explained, again and I stand by what I said.
 
A pony is about a billion times more appropriate for a toddler than a firearm.
Can a toddler accidently kill someone with a pony?

Putting a toddler on a pony unless it is one of those walk-in-a-circle with the parent walking alongside deals, is foolhardy.
 
The sandbox can be a tough place
 
There are or should be consequences for patents who irresponsibly allow kids access to alcohol, vehicles or firearms.
so you want to make it less likely someone will report their kids?

Seems like a family stupid idea but then again that's what this is all about right.
Of how they screwed up by not storing their guns correctly.
How do you know they weren't
 
I'm having to explain it because apparently at least two people here are unable or willing to comprehend simple sentences.

I'm not going around in circles with you. I've explained, again and I stand by what I said.
I guess I don't really understand what the issue is. Loads of parents do shooting sports with their kids
 
The only thing people can do is keep pointing out the bad ideas which evolve out of bad thinking, and get described as “values” and “beliefs.”

religious beliefs are declining in the US. They will continue to do so, and hopefully eventually become so minor as to not hugely affect society.
The problem, of course, is that not everyone shares the same values and beliefs. So are you a parent yourself?
 
The fact that you started complaining about “communism“ and defending opposition to desegregation speaks for itself.

I'm supposed to complain about forced desegregation to whatever extent, and support communism? Is that it?

Did you ever answer if you support people being forcibly relocated from their neighborhoods for desegregation purposes?
 
I never said that. Don't take my words out of context and put words in my mouth. If you are going to interact with me, have the courtesy to comment on what I actually said. Here's what I
said.
What do you think a rifle and a shotgun would be used for primarily in South Dakota?
 
I'm supposed to complain about forced desegregation to whatever extent, and support communism? Is that it?

Did you ever answer if you support people being forcibly relocated from their neighborhoods for desegregation purposes?

You complaining bitterly he use the mean ole government forces desegregation says everything anyone needs to know about you
 
Back
Top Bottom