• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gov. Haley to call for removal of Confederate flag from Capitol grounds [W:154]

Should the flag be moved-removed from all State Buildings?


  • Total voters
    70

JANFU

Land by the Gulf Stream
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
59,432
Reaction score
39,008
Location
Best Coast Canada
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Gov. Haley to call for removal of Confederate flag from Capitol grounds | MSNBC
Agree with the Governor
Disagree with the Governor
Not sure
 
Last edited:
I explained in another thread why I believe the flag should be taken down, and that just because the flag is a symbol doesn't mean that it does not have actual consequences:

 
I explained in another thread why I believe the flag should be taken down, and that just because the flag is a symbol doesn't mean that it does not have actual consequences:

That was a great post and you said it much better then I can.

Also I voted moved but meant to hit "removed".
 
Leave the flag. In the same way that it's wrong to punish all citizens by taking away their guns when nuts go on a rampage, so it is wrong to attempt to take away history and culture, just because you don't like a symbol.

The Confederacy and the flag, do not represent slavery except to a few select nuts that adopted the flag for their own hateful purposes. The flag became a symbol of rebellion against the occupying unioners after the Civil War, during the Restoration. The unioners burned, raped and pillaged - and this was after the war was over. The south held on to their flag as a symbol that they would survive and rise again against the aggressors.

And, for those that think Lincoln fought the war over slavery - think again. Emancipation was a by-product of the war.

Read Lincoln's letter to Horace Greeley:

Abraham Lincoln's Letter to Horace Greeley

Lincoln's only purpose was to restore the Union. Period.
 
It's up to the people of each state to determine what their flag looks like.
 
It's up to the people of each state to determine what their flag looks like.

The "Stars & Bars" (Confederate) flag in question is not the South Carolina state flag.

The "Stars & Bars" do not appear, in any way, on the SC State flag.

The flag that is under debate here is a "Confederate" flag that hangs in front of the SC state building along with the State flag.
 
I think the decision should be South Carolinians'.

To late for that NB.
BO called for Reflection. The MS Media helped out. The word was sent out. Quiji was consulted. The Answer.

Send in.....the Illiberals.





Protesters gathered under the controversial Confederate flag at South Carolina's state legislature, demanding it be taken down in response to the Charleston church massacre.

Waving placards, chanting "take it down" and singing "We Shall Overcome," the youthful crowd, black and white, condemned the Civil War saltire as a symbol of lingering racist sentiment in the American South.....snip~

Confederate flag protest in South Carolina
 
it is wrong to attempt to take away history and culture, just because you don't like a symbol.

White southerners certainly do associate a number of historical and cultural things with the Confederate flag that have nothing to do with slavery, I'll grant you that.

Black southerners probably associate different things with that flag. Things exactly like slavery and Jim Crow and centuries of oppression.

Both for better (and I'll freely admit that there are many admirable things about southern history and culture) and for worse (though there are also a lot of disgusting and despicable aspects of southern history and culture) nobody can take that history away.

Removing a flag doesn't remove history or culture.

German Strafgesetzbuch § 86a outlaws the Swastika and numerous other objects of Nazi symbolism, but certainly nobody currently living in the developed world is unaware of Nazi history.

History not withstanding I think that there's a lot of value in removing a symbol which, while it might serve as a source of pride for some, is also a source of pain for many others.

I'm not a South Carolinian, so I really don't feel that I've got any dog in this fight.

I think flying a Confederate flag in front of the state house is a real douchebag move, but I don't have to live there, and never would consider living there, so I really don't care what they do.

But if I were a resident/citizen of South Carolina I would very much support the flag's removal.

If you want Confederate history you can always get it from a book, or from some means other than jamming your thumb in the eye of the state's 30% African American population.
 
I heard Governor Pataki this morning on Fox saying that he was sure that South Carolina would do the "right" thing and thought to myself, "Well, that's up to South Carolina to decide."
 
The question is not what Lincoln was fighting for, the question is what was the Confederacy was fighting for, what the flag represents. The Confederacy was fighting to maintain their economic system, that was based on slavery. The flag represents that system, it represents a system based on slave labor.
 
Quick question: If a German decided to fly the Nazi flag under the premise that their ancestors did so, and they want to honor those ancestors and what they fought for, not necessarily the whole burning Jews in gas ovens part, would anybody buy it?
 

Why is there always some numb nut holding the sign upside down? We're going to have to get these signs made with an "Up" arrow, I guess. That's disheartening. Reminds me of Being There, with Peter Sellers.
 
Why is there always some numb nut holding the sign upside down? We're going to have to get these signs made with an "Up" arrow, I guess. That's disheartening. Reminds me of Being There, with Peter Sellers.

I thought the one saying they marched in 2000 and still march. Was pretty good.

Don't even need a cause. :lol:
 
I heard Governor Pataki this morning on Fox saying that he was sure that South Carolina would do the "right" thing and thought to myself, "Well, that's up to South Carolina to decide."



I am a South Carolinian. I was around during the first flag flap in the 90s, which was eventually ended by moving it to the War Memorial in 2000. The law doing so says this cannot be changed or modified without a 2/3rds majority of our State Congress agreeing.

That.... is likely to take a while, if it happens at all. Some of you may not be aware how hard it is to get any Congress to muster a 2/3rds majority about ANYTHING.


I'm ok with that. I don't believe we should react to the hysteria in haste. We should reflect, consider, discuss, debate at length... and then decide, and act with due deliberation, making it clear we are not acting as a result of the outside hysteria but of our own volition.

I'm slightly disappointed that our Governor didn't wait a while before saying something like this... it makes her look like she is too subject to outside influence.


Me personally.... I don't really care all that much. I thought the War Memorial was a good place for it. Ok now a lot of people think it shouldn't be right there at the edge of State House grounds, they think it shows approval of what only a few % of nuts and haters think it means. Ok fine. Move it to some other Confederate Memorial place in Columbia and leave it be. Or leave it where it is and tell all the outsiders howling over a piece of cloth to go play hide and go @#$ themselves.

Doesn't really matter that much to me, I just don't want whatever is done, done under outside pressure.


Best thing the SC Congress should do, is respond to Governor Haley with "We'll put it on next year's legislative agenda, and we'll get back to you. Meanwhile, we have far more important things to handle."
 

Not everyone was fighting for slavery, to many they fought to protect their homes and to defend against what was seen as federal govt intervention. There is more cultural significance than slavery in that flag, and I say that as someone who's family fought for the north.

I don't have a dog in this fight-but if the citizens of that state want it, it should be allowed.
 

The fact is the flag was revived as a FU to Federal desegregation efforts, in SC and other former Confederate states, in the 1950s and early 1960s. That is the background for the resurgence. So if the "aggressors" in 1950s were liberals and Yankees determined to see SC treat blacks as equal human beings, then perhaps the point is valid, the flag was a symbol that they'd prevail over them in their defense of Jim Crow and institutionalized, state sponsored white supremacy.

And, for those that think Lincoln fought the war over slavery - think again. Emancipation was a by-product of the war.

As several have noted, the Southern states certainly believed Lincoln was determined to end slavery, and if I recall correctly his election was explicitly noted in the declarations of secession in at least one state. And the war was about slavery, the seceding states explicitly recognize that was the reason, so yes, emancipation was a by product of a war about slavery.
 

Of course it matters what Lincoln was fighting for - it was his war.

The South was fighting to keep the union troops from burning and destroying everything in sight. They failed, but that doesn't mean they did not honor their states. Less than 5% of the people ever owned slaves of benefited from the slave trade. The vast, vast majority fought to survive. The union was ruthless in battle and in the Reconstruction that followed.
 



Heya Goshin. :2wave: BO said time to reflect. That means no time to waste. NBC.....Savannah Guthrie remember. Then CBS asking Haley to answer the call about racism in her state.

Hillary needs helps with S Carolina in a General, huh?
 
Not everyone was fighting for slavery,
I did not say they were, you created a straw argument. The argument is what the Confederacy represented, what the flag represents. It represents a slave based economic system which the Confederacy fought to preserve.
 
Heya Goshin. :2wave: BO said time to reflect. That means no time to waste. NBC.....Savannah Guthrie remember. Then CBS asking Haley to answer the call about racism in her state.

Hillary needs helps with S Carolina in a General, huh?



Pfffff. Hillary couldn't win SC in the general election if she personally handed each and every SC voter a check for fifty grand.

The primary maybe.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…