I was unaware of this thread until you called me out to it. I'm not sure if this particular forum is for debate or simply a place to express your own thoughts on a subject. Therefore, I'll just make one comment and leave it there. Especially since this subject is being addressed in another thread.Thanks to @Overitall for giving this logical point.
Oddly indeed, why mention only Jesus Christ? Surely, Peter would've known about the exact command.
Peter knew there was no need to add in the name of "The Father and the Holy Spirit," because both are in Jesus Christ.
Jesus is God.
1 Cor 1:13
Has Christ been divided? Paul was not crucified for you, was he? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?
If Jesus is not God - that means The Father was not crucified for us.
So, why did Jesus command baptize in the Name of the Father?
I was unaware of this thread until you called me out to it. I'm not sure if this particular forum is for debate or simply a place to express your own thoughts on a subject. Therefore, I'll just make one comment and leave it there. Especially since this subject is being addressed in another thread.
With regards to what I highlighted in bold.
If Peter knew that why didn't Jesus also know it?
You specifically answered my question here in the other thread? That's interesting since I just now asked it. Can you point me to the post where you answered this question?It's the same response I gave to you in another thread.
I simply added it here since your logical point given in that thread, actually is an evidence that supports my OP.
If you want to discuss it further, we can continue in that other thread.
You specifically answered my question here in the other thread? That's interesting since I just now asked it. Can you point me to the post where you answered this question?
You specifically answered my question here in the other thread? That's interesting since I just now asked it. Can you point me to the post where you answered this question?
Huh?I missed that last one. I went back to answer it. If you could also answer what I asked.
Post #257.
Christian Confronts Rabbi Tovia Singer over Trinity Doctrine Live on Air! Is it Idolatry?...
This is the kind of crap you guys read? I even read your responses.debatepolitics.com
So you're an individual of great faith then. Congrats!No. To assume something is true calls for evidence, believing something is not true doesn't need evidence.
Well, thank you.So you're an individual of great faith then. Congrats!
When the Bible translators say the spirit of truth the original text uses the word he, but when they use the word holy spirit the original text uses the word it. Because the former is a person.God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit - are all ONE and the Same.
John 15:26
“When the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father,
He will testify about Me,
He receives revelation, while God does not. That he receives revelation means he is a prophet.for He will not speak on His own initiative,
but whatever He hears, He will speak;
When the Bible translators say the spirit of truth the original text uses the word he, but when they use the word holy spirit the original text uses the word it. Because the former is a person.
But the problems don't stop there.
He receives revelation, while God does not. That he receives revelation means he is a prophet.
I see you ignored most of what I said.That supports the Three-in-One.
It means that the Spirit will not speak on His own Authority.
He does not speak from himself that is independent of God (Father and Son).
I see you ignored most of what I said.
Then he isn't God. God is independent and the Christian claim is precisely that each third is a complete God. You have refuted that.
You didn't address the grammatical issue of it and he at all.I didn't ignore it. I debunked it.
"..............for He will not speak on His own authority,"
He (the Spirit), does not speak from himself that is independent of God (Father and Son).
He is not independent of God......................................Because, HE IS GOD!
He does not have His OWN authority........................... because..............................He is not separate from God. HE IS GOD!
They're all One and The Same!
The explanation is lost to you..........................that's, the problem.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?