Global warming now the cause of prostitution

[ludin]

Unfortunately your title is wrong. Nobody is claiming global warming is "the cause" of prostitution.

She makes a forward thinking statement about the negative impacts of climate change.



Probably a bridge too far for many people to consider but hardly an unreasonable prediction.

see what I mean this is the perfect example of delusion and paraniona.

global warming will cause women to go into prostitution.
lol :lamo it's all science folks it's all science.

 

[Deuce]

It's the perfect response to a ridiculous post. You tried to honestly use a "??? --> PROFIT!" argument which is hilarious.

Which part do you think is missing?

 

[VanceMack]

No, what happened??

There were massive hordes of Americans migrating south desperate for food. This was occurring at the same time England was destroyed. You dont remember all those alarmist dire predictions coming to fruition?

Surely you remember the now extinct polar bears.


Come on, man...where have you been the last 30 years????

 

[Verax]

see what I mean this is the perfect example of delusion and paraniona.

global warming will cause women to go into prostitution.
lol :lamo it's all science folks it's all science.

Did you know that when a hurricane is coming people tend to buy strawberry pop tarts disproportionately more than many other items. People do this likely because they find comfort in such items.

Sociology and cause / effect relationships are not difficult concepts to grasp... for most people.

 

[Verax]

There were massive hordes of Americans migrating south desperate for food. This was occurring at the same time England was destroyed. You dont remember all those alarmist dire predictions coming to fruition?

Surely you remember the now extinct polar bears.


Come on, man...where have you been the last 30 years????

You're just repeating debunked straw men that have been destroyed a million times in this subforum. But all good deniers repeat the same wrong things over and over, else they wouldn't have any bs to peddle.

 

[VanceMack]

You're just repeating debunked straw men that have been destroyed a million times in this subforum. But all good deniers repeat the same wrong things over and over, else they wouldn't have any bs to peddle.

Are you suggesting AGW alarmists (INCLUDING the chief advisor to Al Gore) did NOT make those predictions?

See...AGW people are ****ed. They cant make ridiculous outlandish dire predictions that are forecast out 100 years because no one will give a ****. But when they make their ridiculous outlandish forecasts 25 years out, its too easy to demonstrate just how ridiculously foolish their predictions have been.

Beware the pending Ice Age...said the AGW scientists in 1972.

 

[jmotivator]

Which part do you think is missing?

The sanity.

You have zero rationale to justify any of the "-->" steps. It only flows if you assume the absurd connections you are making.

 

[VanceMack]

Did you know that when a hurricane is coming people tend to buy strawberry pop tarts disproportionately more than many other items. People do this likely because they find comfort in such items.

Sociology and cause / effect relationships are not difficult concepts to grasp... for most people.

Did YOU know that the reason we are having more and more hurricanes every year and that the reason they have been steadily increasing in ferocity is due to global warming? Same with tornados! Its all true...sweartagawd!!!!

 

[Verax]

Are you suggesting AGW alarmists (INCLUDING the chief advisor to Al Gore) did NOT make those predictions?

See...AGW people are ****ed. They cant make ridiculous outlandish dire predictions that are forecast out 100 years because no one will give a ****. But when they make their ridiculous outlandish forecasts 25 years out, its too easy to demonstrate just how ridiculously foolish their predictions have been.

Beware the pending Ice Age...said the AGW scientists in 1972.

There were a few papers that supported global cooling in the 70's among many more that supported global warming and you're comparing this to a present day worldwide consensus involving thousands of papers, thousands of scientists and billions of dollars of research?

 

[Verax]

Did YOU know that the reason we are having more and more hurricanes every year and that the reason they have been steadily increasing in ferocity is due to global warming? Same with tornados! Its all true...sweartagawd!!!!

Last time I looked the connection between agw and increased severity in weather was somewhat unclear. Also these kinds of trends and evidence patterns develop slowly over decades.

 

[VanceMack]

There were a few papers that supported global cooling in the 70's among many more that supported global warming and you're comparing this to a present day worldwide consensus involving thousands of papers, thousands of scientists and billions of dollars of research?

And ALL their dire predictions have proven to be bull****. Oh...sure...its EASY to fix though. When the real data doesnt support the actual data all you have to do is create some new formulas and 'game' the data to show what you said it would show. And when the predictions dont come true, well...just blame it other things that cant be proven...all the AGW is being absorbed into the deep oceans.

Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.
Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate - Forbes

"Mike, can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith Briffa re AR4 )UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 4th Assessment)?"

Of course...adjusting actual data to coincide with models and plotted data...well...that's not a BAD thing...right?

 

[VanceMack]

Last time I looked the connection between agw and increased severity in weather was somewhat unclear. Also these kinds of trends and evidence patterns develop slowly over decades.

Unclear...

Since the reality is that severe weather occurrences are LOWER than any time since the early 90's, I'd say that 'link' is about nil.

But hey...thats par for the course. Yet another ridiculous bull**** prediction.

 

[Verax]

And ALL their dire predictions have proven to be bull****. Oh...sure...its EASY to fix though. When the real data doesnt support the actual data all you have to do is create some new formulas and 'game' the data to show what you said it would show. And when the predictions dont come true, well...just blame it other things that cant be proven...all the AGW is being absorbed into the deep oceans.

Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.
Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate - Forbes

"Mike, can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith Briffa re AR4 )UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 4th Assessment)?"

Of course...adjusting actual data to coincide with models and plotted data...well...that's not a BAD thing...right?

Yawn, I have little interest in debating someone like you. I make an assertion about your initial argument and you counter by bringing up like 10 different myths that have nothing to do with the original argument. If I debunk these 10 myths you'll just bring up 20 more or babble on about Al Gore. This is just whack a mole with bs.

 

[VanceMack]

Yawn, I have little interest in debating someone like you. I make an assertion about your initial argument and you counter by bringing up like 10 different myths that have nothing to do with the original argument. If I debunk these 10 myths you'll just bring up 20 more or babble on about Al Gore. This is just whack a mole with bs.

You CANT debate someone like me. You CAN throw out a bunch of biull**** graphs and models created and 'approved' by a bunch of like minded people. But you CANT debate the validity of the research. You cant debate the outcomes. You cant debate the fact that time and time again those people have been caught with their pants down altering data sets and creating models with the intent to prove a theory. You cant argue against the fact that there has been a concerted effort to silence a threat to consensus including threats to livelihood and in fact coordinated efforts to fire people that dare to disagree with the 'settled science'. You know...that 'settled science' that is in a constant state of flux because estimates and predictions continuously and consistently fail.

And instead...I'm just going to keep point out that they keep getting caught with their pants down lying, that their predictions have been dismal failures at best and laughable jokes at least. And there is no debating that.

 

[Verax]

You CANT debate someone like me. You CAN throw out a bunch of biull**** graphs and models created and 'approved' by a bunch of like minded people. But you CANT debate the validity of the research. You cant debate the outcomes. You cant debate the fact that time and time again those people have been caught with their pants down altering data sets and creating models with the intent to prove a theory. You cant argue against the fact that there has been a concerted effort to silence a threat to consensus including threats to livelihood and in fact coordinated efforts to fire people that dare to disagree with the 'settled science'. You know...that 'settled science' that is in a constant state of flux because estimates and predictions continuously and consistently fail.

And instead...I'm just going to keep point out that they keep getting caught with their pants down lying, that their predictions have been dismal failures at best and laughable jokes at least. And there is no debating that.

You're a repository of myths. This is what happens when you read right-wing propaganda and don't realize you're being programmed full of bs. They never got "caught" altering data or any other such nonsense, it was a right-wing witch hunt that turned up nothing. There was never a witch hunt to "silence" critics or people with alternate views on gw. There is however a push back against people who spread lies and crap, that is the campaign you're part of and don't even realize it.

The only part of your diatribe that has any semblance of truth to it are the complaints about the models not being perfect, they're not. They didn't know the climate would react this way with heat going into the upper ocean and unknowingly elsewhere. Despite this though the evidence is still very strong we are going to see significant warming in the future and doesn't really change much in the end. The "lull" in warming will likely be made up for by increased warming once that heat works its way back out of the ocean cycle and into the atmosphere.

 

[Desert Storm]

There were massive hordes of Americans migrating south desperate for food. This was occurring at the same time England was destroyed. You dont remember all those alarmist dire predictions coming to fruition?

Surely you remember the now extinct polar bears.


Come on, man...where have you been the last 30 years????

You're right, its all being surpressed by our corrupt press though

 

[VanceMack]

You're a repository of myths. This is what happens when you read right-wing propaganda and don't realize you're being programmed full of bs. They never got "caught" altering data or any other such nonsense, it was a right-wing witch hunt that turned up nothing. There was never a witch hunt to "silence" critics or people with alternate views on gw. There is however a push back against people who spread lies and crap, that is the campaign you're part of and don't even realize it.

The only part of your diatribe that has any semblance of truth to it are the complaints about the models not being perfect, they're not. They didn't know the climate would react this way with heat going into the upper ocean and unknowingly elsewhere. Despite this though the evidence is still very strong we are going to see significant warming in the future and doesn't really change much in the end. The "lull" in warming will likely be made up for by increased warming once that heat works its way back out of the ocean cycle and into the atmosphere.

Riiiiiiiiiight. Now...pardon me while I lay in firewood and build the tornado shelter. We've just been dodging bullets so far.

:lamo

 

[VanceMack]

You're right, its all being surpressed by our corrupt press though

ExZACTly....

 

[ludin]

Did you know that when a hurricane is coming people tend to buy strawberry pop tarts disproportionately more than many other items. People do this likely because they find comfort in such items.

Sociology and cause / effect relationships are not difficult concepts to grasp... for most people.

which has nothing to do with the fact that hurricanes cause people to buy strawberry poptarts.
neither will global warming cause women to go into prostitution.

but yea it's all science :lamo

 

[ludin]

Are you suggesting AGW alarmists (INCLUDING the chief advisor to Al Gore) did NOT make those predictions?

See...AGW people are ****ed. They cant make ridiculous outlandish dire predictions that are forecast out 100 years because no one will give a ****. But when they make their ridiculous outlandish forecasts 25 years out, its too easy to demonstrate just how ridiculously foolish their predictions have been.

Beware the pending Ice Age...said the AGW scientists in 1972.

they did make those predictions and they were wrong just like they were wrong about the Himalayan melt by 2033.
100% wrong.

yet these alarmist will continue to believe any non-sense on the topic that they throw out there because they are so brainwashed.
I mean look at his defense over the fact that global warming will cause women to become prostitutes.

instead of calling out the BS that it is he defends this BS.

yet hey folks it is still science even though they have a 5% model pass rate.

 

[VanceMack]

they did make those predictions and they were wrong just like they were wrong about the Himalayan melt by 2033.
100% wrong.

yet these alarmist will continue to believe any non-sense on the topic that they throw out there because they are so brainwashed.
I mean look at his defense over the fact that global warming will cause women to become prostitutes.

instead of calling out the BS that it is he defends this BS.

yet hey folks it is still science even though they have a 5% model pass rate.

On the plus side...

Al Gore says thank you!

 

[Earthling]

Make a separate list of the things that are effected[sic] by climate in general and see if you can find a connection.

To the best of my knowledge, nothing has yet been "effected" or affected by recent climate change.

 

[beerftw]

A bridge too far? For the people who think SSM causes the destruction of society *and* tornadoes?

C'mon

ssm dont causse tornados,people who think such are silly,trailer parks cause them,proof tornados appear as far west as california,and still only hit cities loaded with trailers.

 

[jmotivator]

which has nothing to do with the fact that hurricanes cause people to buy strawberry poptarts.
neither will global warming cause women to go into prostitution.

but yea it's all science :lamo

Next up: Global warming will be responsible for PROSTINADOES!! Tornados that, after cutting through red light districts, will be filled with swarming prostitutes.

 

[Fearandloathing]

Dem resolution warns global warming could force women into prostitution | Fox News

what won't they blame on global warming next?
I guess global warming will next be the cause of puppies getting kicked or something.

and they call this non-sense science give me a break.
these people are delusional and frankly just plain nuts.

Denier and woman hater!

Hillary is going to get you....