• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Glen beck nailing it with syria

I don't care what you think.
That isn't a valid rebuttal either.


Plenty of people have seen the evidence that chem and sub factories were hit.
Well good. it shouldn't be hard to prove it, then.

Disabling Japan's ability to produce such was key in our effort to limit their ability to wage war after the a-bomb strikes.
japan was defeated..they had no air force, no army, no navy, no oil and none of the essential resources to build weapons or maintain any hostilities.... and they are isolated and live on an island. They weren't going anywhere. A blockade would have worked and no invasion was necessary.

Nuking japan was necessary and prevented the deaths of 100s of thousands of Americans and Japanese.
That is making excuses. Repeating propaganda doesn't substitute for reality.

japan was defeated..they had no air force, no army, no navy, no oil and none of the essential resources to build weapons or maintain any hostilities.... and they are isolated and live on an island. They weren't going anywhere. A blockade would have worked and no invasion was necessary.


Besides, the US fighting Japan was just. Assad slaughtering tens of thousands of civilians and using chems against them is not.

So in a "just" war you think it's ok to murder civilians, women and children with weapons of mass destruction....and not just "gas".... NUKES..LMAO..

..and there isn't conclusive proof who used the gas in syria, is there?

Hell..why don't we nuke them, too? LMFAO

Let's go get North Korea while we're at it. Pop a couple of nukes there..what the heck...
 
We effected regime change in Libya without such. Terrorists are not in charge of Libya. There's no WMD use in Libya.
The Muslim Brotherhood plays a significant role, don't you agree?

The chemical stockpiles are in bad shape. But you never give up shilling for IslamoNazis do you?
 
Some people have no concept of priorities. It's a wonder how they function.
On this we completely agree.

The low cost alternative is a half billion dollars. How about this, let's set that money aside so that kids in this nation can have vouchers for school choice?
 
We can take the moral high ground because we are not a dictatorship targeting tens of thousands of our own civilians and employing chemical weapons against them.
We are in a soft tyranny where half of the nation, the taxpayers, are targeted for harassment every day. We experienced a coup where the IRS was used to suppress the conservative groups. That continues today.
 
Yes, there is. Check the news today.

I don't see any "proof".

Just one more point, if you will answer?
You already said nuking japan was "necessary" because it was "just".

Besides, the US fighting Japan was just.

Will you answer these short questions so I can understand better?


In a "just" war you think it's ok to murder civilians, women and children with weapons of mass destruction (NUKES) as we did in japan?

..and there really isn't conclusive proof who used the gas in syria ..but for the sake of argument at this point let's say assad did....

We would be justified in nuking them, too, right?

Let's go get North Korea while we're at it. Pop a couple of nukes there..what the heck.., right?
 
If you're done crying about the past, how about you deal with the present. We're not supporting terrorists. The vast majority of rebels are not terrorists. Can you deal with that?
It is the Islamofascists that will end in control.

Why do you hate the United States?
 

ha.ha.ha.ha. ..and you aren't evading the question either, are you?

Besides, the US fighting Japan was just.
In a "just" war you think it's ok to murder civilians, women and children with weapons of mass destruction (NUKES) as we did in japan?

..and there really isn't conclusive proof who used the gas in syria ..but for the sake of argument at this point let's say assad did....

We would be justified in nuking them, too, right?

Let's go get North Korea while we're at it. Pop a couple of nukes there..what the heck.., right?
 
ha.ha.ha.ha. ..and you aren't evading the question either, are you?

To be honest, I don't read the rest of a post after ~"all evidence is fake".
 
The plan is to overthrow Assad and let the moderates deal with the terrorists, as a democratic regime supported by the UN.

I guess you think it's terrible for Syria to buy roads and schools instead of bombs intended for civilians, but I think it's a good plan.
This plan? Who has it?

Moderates? That is cute.
 
It will take a generation or two for democracy to get on its feet, anywhere. It's about time the Syrians got started on the path to peace and development. Allowing dictators to kill tens of thousands of civilians and employ chemical weapons against them is not acceptable.

No doubt you are in training this very moment to head off to Syria and take your place in the ranks of the moderates.
 
So we DIDN'T nuke japan after all....I see...

I was referring to your denial of evidence that Assad employed chems against Damascus civilians.
 
No doubt you are in training this very moment to head off to Syria and take your place in the ranks of the moderates.

No, I'm joining the IslamoNaziFascists, of course!
 
I was referring to your denial of evidence that Assad employed chems against Damascus civilians.

Post the proof.
What's your source?


Besides, the US fighting Japan was just.

In a "just" war you think it's ok to murder civilians, women and children with weapons of mass destruction (NUKES) as we did in japan?
If assad did use gas, we would be justified in nuking them, too, right?

Let's go get North Korea while we're at it. Pop a couple of nukes there..what the heck.., right?
It would be "just".
 
I presume that your presence here means you are capable of reading today's news.

Link?

Besides, the US fighting Japan was just.
In a "just" war you think it's ok to murder civilians, women and children with weapons of mass destruction (NUKES) as we did in japan?

..and there really isn't conclusive proof who used the gas in syria ..but for the sake of argument at this point let's say assad did....

We would be justified in nuking them, too, right?

Let's go get North Korea while we're at it. Pop a couple of nukes there..what the heck.., right?
 
Who gives a **** what people are angry about? There's people still pissed off about Canaan. There's unibombers, suicide bombers and other flat-out crazies. You really think they need to be catered to?


We need to deal with reality, today.

and past actions make up today's reality.

Imagine an abusive spouse coming back despite a restraining order, saying, "No, baby, that was then, this is now. We have to deal with today's reality. I totally operate under different rules now."
 
Back
Top Bottom