• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ginni Thomas is at the center of a massive new scandal after a report exposes her role = investigate further then BUST and bring charges.

R

Razoo

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 1, 2017
Messages
24,476
Reaction score
7,808
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Apparently she's not entitled to an opinion nor access to her husband.
 
“The supreme court is unlike any other branch because it only has its legitimacy to make the public adhere to what it does. Lose that and the court loses the kind of institutional pull that makes the law come together and bind us,” Murray said.

Unlike all other federal judges in lower appeals and district courts who are obliged to recuse themselves in cases of potential conflict of interest involving their spouses, the nine justices of the supreme court are entirely unfettered by any code of judicial ethics. They in effect police themselves.

Ginni Thomas embroiled in scandal over her role in plot to overturn Roe
 
“The Thomases are normalizing the prospect of too close an association between the supreme court and those who litigate before it,” said Melissa Murray, a law professor at New York University and co-host of the Strict Scrutiny podcast. “This isn’t the first time that Mrs Thomas has had dealings with those who come before the court and seek her husband’s vote.”

The revelation that there is substantial overlap between Ginni Thomas and the anti-abortion lobbying effort focused on her husband and the other conservative justices will intensify the growing sense of unease surrounding her hyper-energetic conservative activism. In recent years she has placed herself in the thick of some of the most bitterly contested political controversies that have come – or could come – before the court.


Earlier this year, the New Yorker published an investigation into the mounting evidence of possible conflicts of interest under the headline: ‘Is Ginni Thomas a threat to the supreme court?’

Thomas has been dubbed a “radical insurrectionist” for her role in backing Trump’s attempt to subvert the 2020 presidential election. Yet her husband has refused to recuse himself from cases relating to the insurrection, including one in January in which he became the only justice to dissent in an 8-1 decision over allowing hundreds of documents held by the National Archives to be reviewed by the House committee investigating the January 6 storming of the US Capitol.

Five weeks after that decision, it was revealed that leading up to January 6 Ginni Thomas exchanged 29 text messages with Trump’s White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, urging him to block Joe Biden’s victory. It is very possible that those text messages were among the documents that the committee had been seeking, with Clarence Thomas the sole justice opposing disclosure.

The January 6 committee has said it wants to interview Ginni Thomas over her anti-democratic antics around the 2020 election.

Last week the Washington Post revealed that she applied pressure on lawmakers in Wisconsin to block Biden’s win, having previously done the same in Arizona.

Ginni Thomas embroiled in scandal over her role in plot to overturn Roe
 
Last edited:
dmpi said:
Apparently she's not entitled to an opinion nor access to her husband.
Click to expand...

No.

She isn't. Not when it comes to the nation's laws.

Thomas is a fool, ruled by his dick and his wife is as crazy as Trump

Impeach Thomas now. The charhe being his wife acted as a surrogate.
 
Razoo said:
“The supreme court is unlike any other branch because it only has its legitimacy to make the public adhere to what it does. Lose that and the court loses the kind of institutional pull that makes the law come together and bind us,” Murray said.

Unlike all other federal judges in lower appeals and district courts who are obliged to recuse themselves in cases of potential conflict of interest involving their spouses, the nine justices of the supreme court are entirely unfettered by any code of judicial ethics. They in effect police themselves.

Ginni Thomas embroiled in scandal over her role in plot to overturn Roe
Click to expand...


Which is why this supreme court is a joke.

Any reasonable court would have refused to hear the R/V matter after half a century. A reasonable court would have asked for 'new' evidence of harm but it didn't. It went with the same half century old arguments....

The 'court' has rendered itself a joke, a bad idea in the first place.

Because of distrust for the courts here we have a 'notwithstanding' law in the constitution. If at any time a province disagrees with a federal law, with exceptions, you can tell Ottawa to go **** itself.
 
dmpi said:
Apparently she's not entitled to an opinion nor access to her husband.
Click to expand...


No, she is not.

Not if she wants her husband to keep his job......unless her husband were to recuse himself. Then she would be free & clear. But as the current evidence shows she is dependent on her husband's ruling...so as long as this slug refuses to do what every justice before him has done, she is abeting violation of the constitution.

This illustrates the depth of the depravity and hatred the right have for their countrymen
 
dmpi said:
Apparently she's not entitled to an opinion nor access to her husband.
Click to expand...
No one is saying that so why sea lion? The issue is that neither she nor anyone else should be allowed to influence a justice's opinion outside of the process of the case itself. That creates a conflict of interest for the justice, who should therefore recuse himself from the case. If Ginni were the Director of the Sierra Club, would it be appropriate for Clarence to adjudicate a case involving the Sierra Club? I think not.
 
Razoo said:
“The supreme court is unlike any other branch because it only has its legitimacy to make the public adhere to what it does. Lose that and the court loses the kind of institutional pull that makes the law come together and bind us,” Murray said.

Unlike all other federal judges in lower appeals and district courts who are obliged to recuse themselves in cases of potential conflict of interest involving their spouses, the nine justices of the supreme court are entirely unfettered by any code of judicial ethics. They in effect police themselves.

Ginni Thomas embroiled in scandal over her role in plot to overturn Roe
Click to expand...

Bob Woodward was able to show that Harry Blackmun's wife had an influence over him when he voted for Roe.

Grow up and stop spamming the board.
 
Fearandloathing said:
That would hurt your cause and possibly lead to fraud charges.

Can't you do what America always does and get some 2nd amendment nut bar to do it
Click to expand...
fair question ......
 
Razoo said:
photo
Ginni Thomas embroiled in scandal over her role in plot to overturn Roe
Right-wing justice Clarence Thomas' wife is at the center of a massive new scandal after a report exposes her role in over half of the briefs urging the high court to overturn Roe.

Take Action: Demand Congress impeach Justices Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and Barrett for perjury!
Click to expand...
I am sure that she will claim she never discussed Roe with her husband, just like she never discussed the "stolen" election with him.
Wonder what these two political figures discuss if not politics?
 
Razoo said:
“The Thomases are normalizing the prospect of too close an association between the supreme court and those who litigate before it,” said Melissa Murray, a law professor at New York University and co-host of the Strict Scrutiny podcast. “This isn’t the first time that Mrs Thomas has had dealings with those who come before the court and seek her husband’s vote.”

The revelation that there is substantial overlap between Ginni Thomas and the anti-abortion lobbying effort focused on her husband and the other conservative justices will intensify the growing sense of unease surrounding her hyper-energetic conservative activism. In recent years she has placed herself in the thick of some of the most bitterly contested political controversies that have come – or could come – before the court.


Earlier this year, the New Yorker published an investigation into the mounting evidence of possible conflicts of interest under the headline: ‘Is Ginni Thomas a threat to the supreme court?’

Thomas has been dubbed a “radical insurrectionist” for her role in backing Trump’s attempt to subvert the 2020 presidential election. Yet her husband has refused to recuse himself from cases relating to the insurrection, including one in January in which he became the only justice to dissent in an 8-1 decision over allowing hundreds of documents held by the National Archives to be reviewed by the House committee investigating the January 6 storming of the US Capitol.

Five weeks after that decision, it was revealed that leading up to January 6 Ginni Thomas exchanged 29 text messages with Trump’s White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, urging him to block Joe Biden’s victory. It is very possible that those text messages were among the documents that the committee had been seeking, with Clarence Thomas the sole justice opposing disclosure.

The January 6 committee has said it wants to interview Ginni Thomas over her anti-democratic antics around the 2020 election.

Last week the Washington Post revealed that she applied pressure on lawmakers in Wisconsin to block Biden’s win, having previously done the same in Arizona.

Ginni Thomas embroiled in scandal over her role in plot to overturn Roe
Click to expand...
This lady is hiding behind some misinformation some would call it lies ....... most likely have not heard the last from her.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom