I really don't find the need to justify my words to you, but if you go back through this entire thread, you will notice I NEVER used the word murdered...and that was for a reason...you can read anything you want into it, I know that's what you do best...
Sad that you respect a guy who killed an unarmed 17yr old, minding his own business in his own neighborhood...
So by that logic, Zimmerman admitted he committed murder when he admitted to the killing./facepalm
When you say:
please tell us how that can be construed as anything other than you think he murdered martin.
Your words....
Please tell me how that would not be "murder".... you made baseless pontifications on the case without the full story.
No, there are two different courts, criminal where a prosecutor can bring a criminal case...and....a civil court where a interested party can bring suite.That is not the way the law works. The only reason a person gets brought to trial is because there is evidence of a crime.
So by that logic, Zimmerman admitted he committed murder when he admitted to the killing.
I really don't find the need to justify my words to you, but if you go back through this entire thread, you will notice I NEVER used the word murdered...and that was for a reason...you can read anything you want into it, I know that's what you do best...
No, their are to different courts, criminal where a prosecutor can bring a criminal case...and....a civil court where a interested party can bring suite.
He has admitted to killing a person, you brought in the "logic" that killing = murder.Really, how do you jump to that conclusion, I believe Zimmerman is claiming self defense, not that he: "killed an unarmed 17yr old, minding his own business in his own neighborhood..."
not all killings are murder, but as factually incorrectly described by jasonI that sure is.
You might be right. I’m not going through all the posts because it doesn’t really matter.
A teen on leave from school was considered suspicious by a guy. You are now on record stating the teen was minding his own business.
How do you know that? How can you be sure when he ran off, it was to hide drugs, or burglary tools?
You want to claim to be this reasonable guy waiting for the evidence, but you are making assumptions that clearly indicate you are not waiting for the evidence at all. You have made up your mind. The teen was innocent, and was murdered.
That is not the way the law works. The only reason a person gets brought to trial is because there is evidence of a crime.
He has admitted to killing a person, you brought in the "logic" that killing = murder.
He has admitted to killing a person, you brought in the "logic" that killing = murder.
Where to you get the info to come to these two conclusion?they clearly conducted a pathetic investigation so his word means nothing
LOLthe part in there that says "at this point" which means they weren't finished with the investigation...
Apparently not.I understand everything about it
No, that was your assumption, he never said "murder", you are trying to put words into his mouth...but that is what you do.I did no such thing. I provided that the context used by jason, in using the term killing an unarmed kid etc was murder. Jason made several inaccurate presumptions, that if true would constitute murder, he did, exactly what he claimed he didn't do.
Isn't the crime the killing of Martin and self defense the killers defense used at trial?
No, that was your assumption, he never said "murder", you are trying to put words into his mouth...but that is what you do.
I'll assume something......If he is innocent of murder, why drop communication with your counsel, disappear...etc.?
You can be arrested for manslaughter, you can be arrested while an investigation is carried out....the power of arrest is broad.Furthermore to this point. When you say someone needs to be arrested for killing someone else it indicates you think a murder was committed. YOU have said you want Zimmerman arrested.
You can be arrested for manslaughter, you can be arrested while an investigation is carried out....the power of arrest is broad.
Again...you are making assumptions.
Um, no, manslaughter is a possibility, it depends on the prosecutor and the evidence.the "killing" as falsey described by jason would be under law, "murder". I am sorry you find this simple concept difficult.
Kinda hard to get that info when you go underground....OOOH MORE SPECULATION! FUN!
let's see, some possibilities, He is aware he will not be charged, he ran out of money, he retained new council, any of a number of reasons.
Disapeared? Maybe because people like spike lee keep trying to tweet his address so the NBP's can collect on that reward for his killing.... gee... common sense, isn't that common anymore. :lol:
Yes, you did make the assumption that in Jason's view there are only two possibilities, murder or innocence.I am not making assumptions. Arrests are made when a crime is believed to have been committed. If the police investigate and determine you did nothing wrong you are not arrested.
Yes, you did make the assumption that in Jason's view there are only two possibilities, murder or innocence.
I pointed out that there are other possibilities for an arrest when someone is killed, you are avoiding your own point.
Um, no, manslaughter is a possibility, it depends on the prosecutor and the evidence.
Kinda hard to get that info when you go underground....
I challenge you to read:
Please to explain how this is anything but calling it "murder", in your eyes. He did exactly what he said he wouldn't do. I am sorry you can't see it.
It is not how I or anyone else SEES IT. It is the word used by the poster. That word was KILLED. And even Zimmerman admits he KILLED Martin.
Sad that you respect a guy who killed an unarmed 17yr old, minding his own business in his own neighborhood...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?