George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of [W:469]

[year2late]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

At first glance only 6 out of 44 involve black males. The call logs are indeed interesting, futilities aplenty.

It was really kind of odd.

 

[jet57]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Moreover nothing.
It had nothing to do with his age.
The information wasn't released because of local policy making it an educational record by there internal police department, not an Official Police Department record which it actually was.

Thankfully the information was leaked and prompted an IA investigation and terminations


You are trying to engage in a discussion of which you know nothing about.
I would suggest you stop, or at least became familiar with what you are attempting to discus.




Now you have just shown you are not being rational about this at all.
Trayvon was not murdered.
Trayvon was a young adult old enough to be emancipated and join the military who wrongly acted out violently and got himself shot.
Zimmerman acted in accordance with the law and was justified in his actions.

Nothing you said has been rational.


No.
That is the evidence. Learn it.

Uh, right. I understand the entire subject very well, and the problem is that YOU don't understand what I'M saying.

Trayvon MArtin was shot and killed unarmed by Zimmerman. The very same Zimmerman who's been in nothing but trouble since AND THEN thinks it's vogue to twitter a picture of the boy's dead body.

That tells us everything we need to know about George Zimmerman. Okay?

That's part one.

Part two is: the gun crowd, in order to prop up Zimmerman's silly CCW argument, is coming waaaay in after the fact and trying to show that an unarmed minor got what he deserved, that is being shot by Zimmerman. The gun crowd is trying to show that Martin was a hardened street youth, on his way to the penitentiary who therefore - out of nowhere - attacked - and was killing a poor innocent neighborhood watch guy who was just doing his job, even though the authorities told him - not to. And of course as a result, a young boy wound up dead: one who - as you say - the cops were trying to protect.

Sure - of course - that makes all the sense in the world. It makes muuuuch more sense than Zimmerman not packing a gun and doing what he was told to do and letting the real police do their jobs and nobody being injured.

Sure.

Martin's dead and Zimmerman posted pictures of his body on twitter.

I know exactly what I'm talking about. Your side is grasping at straws trying to justify Zimmerman's hideous behavior even today.

Note: I had to edit some of your post, otherwise my reply exceeded the characters allowed.

 

[jet57]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Here's something from that article you must have overlooked:



A high school kid with women's jewelry and a watch that he said was "given" to him, but allows the school to confiscate his property, rather than simply telling them the name of the person who gave the items to him.... Nothing suspicious or out of the ordinary about that, right?

It's perfectly normal for a teenaged boy to receive woman's jewelry as a gift, then let it all be taken away from him because he won't divulge the name of his generous gift-giving friend.

Give me a break dude.

.

It also said that the jewelry wasn't stolen.

 

[Grim17]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

It also said that the jewelry wasn't stolen.

No, it said that it wasn't reported stolen... Big Difference.

So why do you think Trayvon allowed all the jewelry and the watch to be taken away from him, if it was in fact his? All he had to do was tell them the name of that very generous friend who gave it to him.

You know as well as I do, that makes absolutely no sense unless he stole it, or the person he got it from stole it... Either way, you know exactly what kind of person that makes him.

 

[Excon]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

My response was to the question over whether it was Zimmerman who posted the picture. His actions lead me to believe he did. It's unbelievable to me anyone would attempt to claim posting a picture of a dead teenager is anything else but tasteless, no matter the context.

And have you since learned that it was a retweet of what someone else posted?

 

[Excon]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

We have every evidence he provoked the attack by following him in his vehicle and then exiting his vehicle and chasing Martin on foot.

You have absolutely zero evidence of provocation on Zimmerman's part, only evidence that Trayvon attacked without provocation.

You can try to claim there is nothing wrong with that but it is blatant dishonesty and Zimmerman never said getting hit is why he killed Martin.

And again this is a dishonest presentation.

He was found not guilty because the jury thought he had to intend to kill Martin when he fired his gun.

He was found not guilty because it was self defense which is justified under the law.

And the video of the the lame juror who went on the news was already provided.
She spoke a lot of bs trying to redeem herself in the eyes of her community, because as we all know, her community wanted an innocent man found guilty.

Martin runs away from Zimmerman.

No. He did not run from Zimmerman. That is an inaccurate description.
After circling Zimmerman, he ran off in a skipping like manner. That is what a person does when they are showing they are not intimidated.

Zimmerman exits his vehicle and runs after him.

No he didn't.
The evidence is that he walked. It was the wind that is heard, which has already been supported by the weather records and the fact that you get the same wind noise while walking in the walk-through video.

You want to claim he did not chase him on foot????

D'oh!
iLOL
There was no foot chase.
There was no chase. There was an attempt to follow that was not carried through.

He was not suspicious. He flat out stated:

"‘F–king punks. These a–holes. They always get away’"

It is painfully clear he already convicted Martin of being a criminal and skipped right past the "suspicious" part. Go ahead and pretend his own words do not prove that because from what i have seen so far on this board is people who defend him probably also sleep under confederate blankets.

1. HTat was him blowing off steam not making an accusation.
2. Suspicious peoole do get away, or do you not realize that?
3. This is irrelevant to what happened.

Too bad he didnt do something like also paint a confederate flag.

iLOL He did.

I hope you enjoy it. iLOL

Zimmerman never said he fired his gun due to being hit and even specifically highlighted he was on the grass and NOT being hit when he pulled his weapon.

The only reason he ever gave for pulling the trigger is the claim Martin SAW his gun and tried to grab it.

And it has already been pointed out to you what he actually said and that it was all part and parcel of the same event. There is no separating what occurred.
He acted in self defense to stop a thug who had attacked him and was harming him.

It is simply not plausible he could have seen such a small black gun tucked away with an inside waistband behind Zimmerman's hip while it was dark outside, raining, while Zimmerman was wearing a coat that went down over his waist.

Nothing you just said is correct.

 

[Excon]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Zimmerman was not wrong :lamo,

That is right and unlike him being in the right, you are in the wrong.

he thought the black kid (racist point of view)

Wrong.
You are making assumptions and showing you do not know what you are talking about.

was possibly a criminal because he walking in "his" neighborhood even though he was not a criminal.

And there is that biased bs. You are leaving out the fact that the evidence is that he saw Trayvon looking into homes. That is wrong behavior.

you mean he stood his ground when followed and targeted for his color by a full grown unknown man?

Oh look at that, more biased bs that shows you have no clue as to what you speak.
Trayvon attacked. He either laid in wait or returned to do so, that is not standing your ground.
And no he wasn't targeted. Trayvon was seen acting suspiciously, he made himself stand out.

but Zimmerman was wrong to call the police IMHO for racially profiling Trayvon,

D'oh!
More biased bs again.
There was no racial profiling.

he was wrong to get out of the car and try to find where the kid was.

No he wasn't.
This argument is totally stupid.
1. No law says you have to remain in your vehicle, to even suggest such is asinine.
2. No law says you are not allowed to observe where a suspicious person ran off to, or prohibits you from keeping track of them until the police you called arrives.
3. And it can't be wrong, as keeping track of a suspicious person in your neighborhood is actually a very prudent and wise thing to do.

---

It's funny to watch the very people who consider the phrase "Black Lives Matter" to be racist, defend Zimmerman, and downplay his Twitter account.

There is a context here that you are not addressing and it makes your comment biased bs.

He has been unjustly attacked for some time. When that type of activity goes on and on it is obviously going to escalate.
Retweeting the image as a response to his attackers, while tasteless, is understandable.
No one has to like it, but it is understandable given the context.
Not recognizing that context only speaks to a persons bias.

 

[Excon]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Now you're just talking crazy.

Yes, it is pretty obvious your replies are based in such.
You haven't made a correct or relevant argument yet and your comments are just delusional emotive bs and have been shown to be wrong.

Look, whatever, anyone knows I defeated you in epic fashion.

iLOL D'oh!
[sarcasm]Suurrre you did.[sarcasm] lol
Keep telling yourself that. Ha, ha, ha. ha.
Your comment isn't based in reality.

But we all know the truth.

Yes, it is there for all to see. You were shown to be wrong. (and not just by me)

If you think my argument is that Zimmerman wasn't getting his ass kicked then you are mistaken.

If you think I'm arguing over Zimmerman's guilt or innocence you're mistaken.

My argument is that Zimmerman is a coward who ONLY did what he did because he had a case of gun muscles.

He strapped on a gun because it made him feel like a tough guy, went out and played Billy Badass, gut his punk card pulled, and shot a kid who never would have bothered him in the first place if he hadn't precipitated the situation.

In addition to that he's a serial woman beater and has been involved in multiple altercations as a result of road rage.

Ultimately my argument is that Zimmerman is a worthless piece of trash and that society would be better off without him.

This recent racist Twitter rant (the actual topic of this thread) is just the latest manifestation of Zimmerman's uselessness.

And you are wrong. Nothing you said is true.

 

[Excon]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Note: I had to edit some of your post, otherwise my reply exceeded the characters allowed.

Not that I mind, but you didn't have to do any such thing.

Uh, right. I understand the entire subject very well,

Obviously you don't, as you just skipped over the information showing you to be wrong in the specific argument we were having.

and the problem is that YOU don't understand what I'M saying.

Obviously not, which is why I am able to show you are wrong.

Trayvon MArtin was shot and killed unarmed by Zimmerman. The very same Zimmerman who's been in nothing but trouble since AND THEN thinks it's vogue to twitter a picture of the boy's dead body.

That tells us everything we need to know about George Zimmerman. Okay?

Nothing but biased emotive spin.

Trayvon attacked and used his own body as a weapon. That is not being unarmed.

"Nothing but trouble since" is a false characterization of what has occurred. None of the allegation since then have been supported or even substantiated. Do you really not understand that?
To use such unsubstantiated allegations is blatant nonsensical bias.

Part two is: the gun crowd, in order to prop up Zimmerman's silly CCW argument, is coming waaaay in after the fact and trying to show that an unarmed minor got what he deserved, that is being shot by Zimmerman. The gun crowd is trying to show that Martin was a hardened street youth, on his way to the penitentiary who therefore - out of nowhere - attacked - and was killing a poor innocent neighborhood watch guy who was just doing his job, even though the authorities told him - not to. And of course as a result, a young boy wound up dead: one who - as you say - the cops were trying to protect.

Sure - of course - that makes all the sense in the world. It makes muuuuch more sense than Zimmerman not packing a gun and doing what he was told to do and letting the real police do their jobs and nobody being injured.

Nothing but pure unadulterated irrational emotive biased bs.

neighborhood watch guy who was just doing his job, even though the authorities told him - not to.

Wrong.
He wasn't on neighborhood watch. He was on his way to the store when he spotted a person looking into homes which is suspicious.

And the authorities didn't tell him not to do anything that evening.

and Zimmerman posted pictures of his body on twitter.

No he didn't.
A statement of bias that just shows you do not know what you are talking about.
He did not post any images. He didn't even post a image.

He retweeted an image someone else already posted. That would be like you quoting the image I posted and someone saying you posted it.

I know exactly what I'm talking about.

iLOL
Obviously not.

Your side is grasping at straws trying to justify Zimmerman's hideous behavior even today.

iLOL D'oh!
Another false statement. Figures.

 

[Geoist]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Uh huh. Your facts.

There is this radical idea that people can form opinions based on what they observe.

 

[Geoist]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

The OP said he re-tweeted it which means somebody else sent it to him forst.

I would like to know who that was and why he did that.

Exactly what would be the moral difference between posting it and re-tweeting it?

 

[Brischera]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

I actually believe Zim was wrong to leave his vehicle to pursue Trayvon, but the jury felt that the shooting was self defense. It is what it is.

"but the jury felt that the shooting was self defense."

Not true. At least some on the jury acquitted on the false belief Zimmerman had to INTEND to kill him when he pulled the trigger. These are trial basics 101 and people still do not know them.

 

[Brischera]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Jury trials are how we discern "truth." It's the best we can do. Your idea that everyone determines their own reality is good for conversation at dinner parties, but it's not a factor when determining guilt and taking away someone's freedom.

But when the people making the decision do not understand the law it inherently means the law is NOT being used for verdicts.

 

[Brischera]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Yes, yes, we know... Everybody got it wrong and you got it right.

You dont need to keep making false claims because Im confident not everyone was as wrong as you.

 

[Brischera]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

You know, you can end the back and forth right now, if you would just boil everything down to it's simplest form and stop retrying the details.

Get to the point and just say what you really believe:

The witnesses got it all wrong.
The evidence presented in court was incorrect.
The forensic evidence was wrong.
The medical reports were wrong.
The audio tapes were misinterpreted.
The police reports were wrong.
The police investigation got it wrong.
The FBI investigation got it wrong.
Every single juror was forced by the judge to acquit, even though they knew he was guilty.

Those are short, sweet and cover your beliefs based on what you've posted on this thread thus far.


.

I really like your style of strawmen. It makes it so much easier than having to actually provide thoughtful comments and it gives great waves to avoiding you addressing facts you do not like.

 

[Brischera]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Yeah that's exactly whatt I'm claiming and this pretty inarguably lays your silly claim to waste.
Repeat- the jury did you buy any of your liberal apologist spin.

Law of Self Defense - Myth Busters: Did Zimmerman ?Chase Down? a Fleeing Martin?

"....ncidentally, this also generally destroys the myth of Zimmerman following Martin in any way that could have caused Martin to be in fear. Zimmerman did not exit his car until Martin had turned the corner. Were Martin fleeing, or even walking, away he would have been at least 150 feet past the corner, the same distance that Zimmerman had to cover from his parked to reach the corner. We now know, of course, that Martin went nowhere much after turning the corner.

In the meantime, after Zimmerman lost sight of Martin at the point he tells the dispatcher “He’s running,” he doesn’t see Martin again until Martin emerges from the bushes. Can you be “following” someone you don’t even see?

Food for thought. And looks to me like this myth is . . . BUSTED!"

LOl......love it when people are forced to cite blogs over Zimmerman's own words.

 

[Brischera]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

So you take somebody's opinion after the fact as proof that race was a factor.

The word opinion is very important in that sentence.

There were many more people that have the opposite opinions.

Why believe the one while discounting the rest?

You have a weird sense of standards. When someone said he did not act with any racism that was also an opinion. For some reason you did not care it was an opinion. When it fit your agenda.

 

[Brischera]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Getting beaten is a figure of speech. It does not mean punches were getting thrown, it means he was beat. He was.

Reading comprehension is fundamental.

Getting hit had NOTHING to do with why he pulled his gun and killed Martin.

You are right. Reading comprehension is fundamental so how many more times do you need to read being hit had NOTHING to do with the trigger being pulled?

The reason you keep referencing the red herring is because you know it is simply not plausible Martin saw the gun before he was shot which means he could not have been trying to take something he did not see.

Which means Zimmerman was not justified in killing him.

Prove me right again and ignore the fact being hit had NOTHING to do with the trigger.

 

[Brischera]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

The only thing that is painfully clear is that you constantly attempt to put words into peoples mouths that are not there and construct constant red herrings and straw men because you have no argument.

Now you are calling me names... Nice.

Please explain how that comment "F–king punks. These a–holes. They always get away’" makes any mention of race, any at all? Fact is it does not. He did not even mention Martins race until asked.

You are not telling the truth and trying to deflect from your comments and the massive lie you perpetrated in your post...



Yes there is something slimy here, but it's not me.

It is HILARIOUS you accuse others of strawmen. I never said:

"F–king punks. These a–holes. They always get away’"

was a reference to race and you know it.

You claimed:

"He never accused Martin of being a thief... He said he was acting suspicious."

I proved you were 100% wrong by quoting Zimmerman stating:

"F–king punks. These a–holes. They always get away’"

That clearly shows Zimmerman already condemned him as a criminal and you know that but instead of being honest or accidentally dropping any integrity you completely ignore how you were proven wrong and create a strawman that those words have anything to do with race.

You are so desperate and beyond repair you actually believe there is any redemption found in saying he did not mention race until dispatch asked. Wow. Really? This is someone who called the cops so often dispatch got to a point of answering with "Hi George!"

While seeking another strawman out why dont you address how many times he called to report African Americans in the 18 months before he killed Martin? I would link the call transcripts but I dont need to because you already have them, right? I mean you wouldnt be posting without having that basic information, would you?

Just highlight how many times he called the cops on African Americans compared to Caucasians.

Or create more strawmen, stomp some feet, and run.

 

[rhinefire]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Was he wearing a hoodie and blitzed on reefer?

 

[blackjack50]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

It is HILARIOUS you accuse others of strawmen. I never said:

"F–king punks. These a–holes. They always get away’"

was a reference to race and you know it.

You claimed:

"He never accused Martin of being a thief... He said he was acting suspicious."

I proved you were 100% wrong by quoting Zimmerman stating:

"F–king punks. These a–holes. They always get away’"

That clearly shows Zimmerman already condemned him as a criminal and you know that but instead of being honest or accidentally dropping any integrity you completely ignore how you were proven wrong and create a strawman that those words have anything to do with race.

You are so desperate and beyond repair you actually believe there is any redemption found in saying he did not mention race until dispatch asked. Wow. Really? This is someone who called the cops so often dispatch got to a point of answering with "Hi George!"

While seeking another strawman out why dont you address how many times he called to report African Americans in the 18 months before he killed Martin? I would link the call transcripts but I dont need to because you already have them, right? I mean you wouldnt be posting without having that basic information, would you?

Just highlight how many times he called the cops on African Americans compared to Caucasians.

Or create more strawmen, stomp some feet, and run.

Again...trayvon would look out of place to anyone regardless of race. Dark. Gated community. Raining. Looking into houses...in an area that HAD experienced breakins.

 

[Black Dog]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Getting hit had NOTHING to do with why he pulled his gun and killed Martin.

You are right. Reading comprehension is fundamental so how many more times do you need to read being hit had NOTHING to do with the trigger being pulled?

The reason you keep referencing the red herring is because you know it is simply not plausible Martin saw the gun before he was shot which means he could not have been trying to take something he did not see.

Which means Zimmerman was not justified in killing him.

Prove me right again and ignore the fact being hit had NOTHING to do with the trigger.

It is HILARIOUS you accuse others of strawmen. I never said:

"F–king punks. These a–holes. They always get away’"

was a reference to race and you know it.

You claimed:

"He never accused Martin of being a thief... He said he was acting suspicious."

I proved you were 100% wrong by quoting Zimmerman stating:

"F–king punks. These a–holes. They always get away’"

That clearly shows Zimmerman already condemned him as a criminal and you know that but instead of being honest or accidentally dropping any integrity you completely ignore how you were proven wrong and create a strawman that those words have anything to do with race.

You are so desperate and beyond repair you actually believe there is any redemption found in saying he did not mention race until dispatch asked. Wow. Really? This is someone who called the cops so often dispatch got to a point of answering with "Hi George!"

While seeking another strawman out why dont you address how many times he called to report African Americans in the 18 months before he killed Martin? I would link the call transcripts but I dont need to because you already have them, right? I mean you wouldnt be posting without having that basic information, would you?

Just highlight how many times he called the cops on African Americans compared to Caucasians.

Or create more strawmen, stomp some feet, and run.

So after all these incoherent posts screaming Zimmerman was racist, you still got nothing. Go figure.

In the end he was found to be legally defending himself from a criminal assault. No federal racist nonsense either. So you still lose, lol.

 

[Brischera]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Again...trayvon would look out of place to anyone regardless of race. Dark. Gated community. Raining. Looking into houses...in an area that HAD experienced breakins.

Then explain why Zimmerman never called the cops on a white guy under the same circumstances.

Explain why Zimmerman called the cops on only African Americans for that "suspicion" in the 18 months before killing him.

There is also no evidence he was looking in anyone's house.

You are also ignoring the fact Zimmerman did not simply "suspect" him.

When you say:

"F–king punks. These a–holes. They always get away’"

You passed suspicion and moved right into conviction.

 

[Black Dog]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

Then explain why Zimmerman never called the cops on a white guy under the same circumstances.

Explain why Zimmerman called the cops on only African Americans for that "suspicion" in the 18 months before killing him.

There is also no evidence he was looking in anyone's house.

You are also ignoring the fact Zimmerman did not simply "suspect" him.

When you say:

"F–king punks. These a–holes. They always get away’"

You passed suspicion and moved right into conviction.

He was still acquitted of all charges and found NOT to be racist. You still lose.

 

[Brischera]

Re: George Zimmerman goes on depraved Twitter rant after retweeting picture of Trayvo

So after all these incoherent posts screaming Zimmerman was racist, you still got nothing. Go figure.

In the end he was found to be legally defending himself from a criminal assault. No federal racist nonsense either. So you still lose, lol.

I lost the moment I responded to you. It was stupid of me to think you would be honest.