- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 16,501
- Reaction score
- 3,829
- Location
- Sheffield
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Global warming is a political not a scientific issue and is not about ‘saving the planet’. The text of the 2015 Paris Climate Accord proves it. It states that climate action must include concern for “gender equality, empowerment for women, and intergenerational equity” as well as “climate justice”. Governments around the world are being advised that all of these steps must be implemented in order to mitigate the evils of global warming.
The empowerment of women has preceded every major change. Change doesn't occur when half the population is a subject of the other. Seems kinda obvious.
Inter-generational equity is about justice relative to different age groups. A big part of the resistance to modern science is old people. They need to be engaged and vested. Also kinda obvious.
I get the impression the OP is from a position of complete and total ignorance on the subject.
When do you think the process of empowerment of women started? Some sort of date on that...
If this is the sort of help you need, it's no wonder your OP is utterly and embarrassingly clueless victim crybaby bs.
I'm a skeptic. Your OP is manbaby victim crap and totally ignorant. Pathetic.
The point of the OP is that it makes plain the political nature of the whole green agenda and that it is not at all about science or the world's climate.
That's moronic and driven by a victim narrative. You need to learn the basics about women and world development.
Well, I am trying to get what it is you are on about so tell me.
I'm not gonna teach you. I'm not hear to speak reason to the Limbaugh cult. I'm here to point out the fact that your OP is moronic and driven by a victim narrative. Real bottom barrel pathetic crap. That's it and I'm done. Don't like it? Make better OPs.
You consider my posts moronic
I consider the OP moronic and I've explained why. You're sold on being a victim. I get it. The women and the browns, they done got you. Poor you. Everyone living on your back. Forever the will behind all of our survival. And never a thanks. I get it.
And your OP displays absolutely no knowledge of world development whatsoever. You come from a position of absolute ignorance, intentional even and enforced by your car's AM radio. I get it.
It's sad and pathetic and you think you have a point about being a victim.
Well, I have a masters in International Environmental Science and I can tell you that your OP is what I'd expect from a fundie kid being homeschooled and about fifteen years old.
Are we done?
No we are not done.
Tell ya what. I'll throw you a Hail Mary and I'll bet ten to one it bounces off your head.
A: "To get this engine running, we need to work on the carb and the spark plugs."
B: "So, this isn't about getting the engine running! It's about carbs and spark plugs! Gotcha!"
You can see how that's moronic, right?
Sure we are. That Hail Mary bounced right off your head, didn't it.
No. I was responding tgo your earlier post when you posted it.
I saw your hail Mary only after posting my responce.
The empowerment of women has preceded every major change. Change doesn't occur when half the population is a subject of the other. Seems kinda obvious.
Inter-generational equity is about justice relative to different age groups. A big part of the resistance to modern science is old people. They need to be engaged and vested. Also kinda obvious.
I get the impression the OP is from a position of complete and total ignorance on the subject.
Wow!
So you see Marke's post as unbecoming of a hetrosexual masculine man. That he is taking the role of a submissive girl valued only for her beauty, the cheer leader role.
How sexist and genderist and homophobic.
My position would be that there may well be homosexuals on the football team, being gay does not mean you are not macho and strong and sporty, see Spartans or the SS/SD. Good luck to the lad who want's the attention of the sports stars. Not my probelm.
Who said anything about gay? Okay, boomer.
A full grown man in a skirt and pom poms is real convincing.
You did.
This is fun.
Your homosexual fantasies are not fun for anyone else. No one said anything about gay. That's your fixation.
Can you manage to explain why you think the OP is wrong?
Can you manage to separate gender and orientation? No. So you don't have a third grader's understanding to begin with. And me, a PhD candidate, is supposed to teach someone without an elementary school level understanding of gender?
You ask too much. I think only Jesus could save you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?