- Joined
- Feb 26, 2007
- Messages
- 13,988
- Reaction score
- 6,593
- Location
- Charlottesville, VA
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Erm. I posted it in response to YOUR direct question asking if anyone thought it was okay. If it has nothing to do with reality, then why ask the ****ing question?
Here, just to refresh your apparently failing memory:
This is the question you asked:
Do you think it's a good idea for males and females to share showers? It's a yes, or no question.
So, why did you ask a question that you feel has nothing to do with reality?
Okay, let me just get this straight for clarification here.
You want "something to back up" the fact that gay men are not women?
Just reposting my questions to see if the OP is able to answer them. I find these social experiments regarding the various levels of denial and misdirection to be fascinating.
I'd still like to know where I questioned his sexuality.
Are you talking about the post where he said that someone suggested that he sucked **** even though nobody did?
...And then answered it yourself, putting words in his mouth. It's apparent you're not looking for an honest debate.I didn't fabricate anything. I asked a question.
...And then answered it yourself, putting words in his mouth. It's apparent you're not looking for an honest debate.
Deflections now? Are you really going to use the "but they did it too so that makes it okay" defense?Honest debate? Saying that I hate gays is honest debate? How about accusations that I suck ****, or that I should be gang raped? Does that fall into the category of, "honest debate"?
Deflections now? Are you really going to use the "but they did it too so that makes it okay" defense?
Yeah, that's what it is. We're afraid our weiners are too small. Great logic.To think of all those delicate little flowers having to.....shudder.... allow a gay guy to see their jewels.
What if they didn't measure up? The horror. Oh, the horror!
Again, you're deflecting and creating straw men.What is ok? I never made any of those comments toward anyone on this thread. So much for, "honest", debate, because you're being very dishonest at this piont.
I challenge you to point where I accused someone of sexual acts, or that they should be raped. We'll be waiting.
I thought he was trying to say straight men = women since he is so worried about their tender little sensibilities being leered at by all the big bad wolves.
It isn't a problem in any other military in the world that allows it. Nor is it a problem in American-based security units like Blackwater.
Hmm. You know openly gay people in blackwater?
I repeat: NO ONE ****ING CARES ABOUT THIS MEN AND WOMEN SHOWERING TOGETHER TRIP YOU'VE BEEN ON. GAY MEN SHOWERING WITH STRAIGHT MEN IS STILL MEN SHOWERING WITH MEN. PERIOD.
I'd love to see him try to defend kicking out linguistic specialists working at Langley because they were gay.
I suspect that's why post 119 has been ignored by him. Has he produced a single decent argument yet?
I would love to see you show us where there were linguists at Lengley fired because they were gay. Good luck with that one, sport.
As for the second paragraph of your personal attack. WTF is there to disagree with in post 119?
I've produce tons of arguemnts and been called a **** sucker in response. Is that the best you ****ers can do???
Generally, it's unwise to say that when there's a thing called "Google." But it's a common sign of such dumb statements to be made by ideological extremists.
Military boots 6 gay Arabic linguists despite shortage. Category: Front Page News from The Berkeley Daily Planet - Friday November 15, 2002
Army dismisses gay Arabic linguist - Military- msnbc.com
First Circuit Rules on “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” Appeal | Latest News | Servicemembers Legal Defense Network
my Bad. Post 116.
Have you noticed that a wide variety of people with different beliefs all think you're nuts?
Have you noticed that I don't give a **** what you think? There's as many people, who are more qualified to opine, that do agree with me.
Actually. I'm fairly new here, but I've read a good many of apdst's posts and I've never seen anything he has written to lead me to believe he is nuts. I also haven't seen anyone else that agrees with you about him.Compelling argument. Keep up the good work. :lol:
Most people who rant on about how it's not an issue to have openly gay men in the military have never served themselves.
Do you have a specific example from your time in the military where banning gays from serving openly would have helped?
Most people who rant on about how it's not an issue to have openly gay men in the military have never served themselves.
First off, if you think that repealing DADT is going to result in a coming out party for all the gays in the military, you're navie to say the least. The fact of the matter is that many soldiers, though granted not all of them, view grown men who sodomize each other as unnatural freaks. Maybe this isn't an "evolved" opinion, but it's just reality.Do you have a specific example from your time in the military where banning gays from serving openly would have helped?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?