- Joined
- Jul 17, 2012
- Messages
- 8,009
- Reaction score
- 3,335
- Location
- New Jersey
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
In historic first, gay marriage is approved by popular vote in Maine, Maryland | The Ticket - Yahoo! News
Bravo the Maine and Maryland. The first of many more to come.
Not right, just liberal. Doing what's liberal, for a while now. I wonder when liberals will open the gates to things like plural marriage?
Not right, just liberal. Doing what's liberal, for a while now. I wonder when liberals will open the gates to things like plural marriage?
At what point would you take issue?I have no issue with plural marriage either. Why should I? Why should you?
Don't be absurd. You need to legalize gay marriage in at least 30 states, or more, before you tackle that issue.Tomorrow yep tomorrow:roll:
Don't be absurd. You need to legalize gay marriage in at least 30 states, or more, before you tackle that issue.
Oh, OK, I see. So you're trying to say that all designs on revising the definition of marriage ends with homosexual couples?Well I was replying to your absurdity
At what point would you take issue?
We both should because it's contrary to the definition of marriage and there's no real purpose behind it.... other than for selfish reasons, of course.
Oh, OK, I see. So you're trying to say that all designs on revising the definition of marriage ends with homosexual couples?
Oh, OK, I see. So you're trying to say that all designs on revising the definition of marriage ends with homosexual couples?
This magical source, for starters:Where does this magical definition come from? And why should it be carved in stone as YOU define it?
Which ever way the wind blows, right winston?I don't currently see any significant movement for plural marriage.
This magical source, for starters:
Marriage - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
What do you think, Dragonfly, is Merriam Websters a magical source? Unicorns and wood fairies?
Which ever way the wind blows, right winston?
This magical source, for starters:
Marriage - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
What do you think, Dragonfly, is Merriam Websters a magical source? Unicorns and wood fairies?
Thank you, Verthaine. Are you saying that you are the original "they" in "they say"?If you choose to let a book do your thinking for you,that of course is your own right.
Just like you don't see anything to the contrary, either. It comes down to "change", doesn't it, liberal? How much will America change over the next four years? Do you see full blown Socialism for us within the next four years?Verthaine;1061116367I said:I see no Amendment in the US Constitution stating that definition must remain that way throughout eternity or because you say so.
I'm waiting for marriage between close relations. .
So Merriam Websters is essentially full of s***, right, professor?Cool. Same book that has a definition for "d'oh"
D'oh - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Did I say that? I thought I was just quoting a definition from a credible source. All you've done so far, is blow hot air.So you're saying dictionaries never change their definitions?
Just like you don't see anything to the contrary, either. It comes down to "change", doesn't it, liberal? How much will America change over the next four years? Do you see full blown Socialism for us within the next four years?
No,and if I did,do you care to point out which post I said it?Thank you, Verthaine. Are you saying that you are the original "they" in "they say"?
Just like you don't see anything to the contrary, either.
It comes down to "change", doesn't it
iberal?
How much will America change over the next four years?
Do you see full blown Socialism for us within the next four years?
At what point would you take issue?
We both should because it's contrary to the definition of marriage and there's no real purpose behind it.... other than for selfish reasons, of course.
Oh, OK, I see. So you're trying to say that all designs on revising the definition of marriage ends with homosexual couples?
Where does this magical definition come from? And why should it be carved in stone as YOU define it?
This magical source, for starters:
Marriage - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
What do you think, Dragonfly, is Merriam Websters a magical source? Unicorns and wood fairies?
So Merriam Websters is essentially full of s***, right, professor?
Did I say that? I thought I was just quoting a definition from a credible source. All you've done so far, is blow hot air.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?