• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup'

You support democrats over republicans. I’m sure of it. Like I said if it quacks like a duck….

It doesn’t matter what you or I think birtherism was based on. Obama blamed it on racism.

It was indeed about disqualifying a political opponent. If Obama was not constitutionally allowed to be president because of his birthplace, then he absolutely should have been disqualified. Nothing desperate about it.
I do lean left, but mostly, I'm anti-Trump, and for good reason. Regardless, the only Democrats I voted for president this century were Kerry in 2004 (because Bush lied us into war with Iraq) and Obama in 2012 (because I thought he did a decent job with the shit show he inherited)

As far as Obama, quote him blaming birtherism on racism.
 
Then those folks should have been charged hard while the others only site seeing much lighter. Abuse of all caused Trump to fix it for them all.
They were charged "hard." And convicted "hard," receiving the longest prison sentences.

Then Trump pardoned seditionists who conspired against America because they conspired for Trump.
 
Over the years the shittiest Republican has been vastly superior to the best Democrat. So even piece of shit RINOS like McCain and Romney were far more aligned with my values and agenda than Obama. I would have preferred my primary candidate to have won but supporting the exact opposite agenda and values will never happen from me. There is no Democrat that will ever be aligned with me more than a Republican. Now I can see myself voting for an independent if the Republican was less conservative than the independent.

To answer I have never voted for a democrat since my first eligible election.
Did not ask if you ever voted for a Democrat. I asked if you vote straight Party lines.

I disagree with you regarding McCain and Romney. Your choice of words to describe them tells all I need to know about your views.
Have a good one.

ps. Trump is a RINO and you do not know it.
 
That answer was moronic and flew in the face of common sense and logic. Not my fault you can’t see the Forrest for the trees. In this case the TDS.

And approval from either of us isn’t required. When this is over all that will be warranted is you acknowledging that we were right. Just like with Trump russian collusion, Biden’s laptop being real, and Joe having applesauce 🧠.
<laughing>

You'll never be right. Obama will never be charged with any crimes related to this. Feel free to bookmark this post if doing so provides you any semblance of relief.
 
The new one. The one he had doctored to highlight the way Russia unsuccessfully attacked our election. The one he wanted that would give credibility to accusations being investigated. Got it.
The "new one" was the one I was talking about. The one in January, 2017. There was nothing "doctored" (your word), in it.
 
From where I sit nothing has changed.

I never thought Russia tried to jack election machines.

And I got suspicious when my wife who is a huge Bernie fan started showing me all the anti-Hillary stuff that was surprisingly well designed, well crafted.

Then there was the Cambridge Analytica episode.

Y’all get back to me when there are charges and court dates.

Until then it’s just red meat for the rubes.

Gotta keep ‘em all riled up or they might notice trump is giving the country to the rich so maybe they’ll let him in the Real Rich Guy Club.
That was the extent of the Russian influence on the election. The emails they had dumped on the Internet caused a rift between Hillary Democrats and Bernie Democrats. And while many Bernie Democrats ultimately supported Hillary, not enough did to make Hillary president.
 
So IYO of the 80-20 crowd only republicans became violent and rioted lol? So when the riots broke out from the crowd of protesters it wouldn’t remain 80-20 in the escalation?

So IYO when all the good folks leave and the evil begins there is less chance of having democrats lol?

That is the funniest shit ever. You know damned good and well that once the good folks left and the riots started it was 99 percent democrats. All the good democrats and republicans split when the shit hit the fan.
How the hell did you extrapolate that from what I posted??
 
The new one. The one he had doctored to highlight the way Russia unsuccessfully attacked our election. The one he wanted that would give credibility to accusations being investigated. Got it.

And every conclusion in the ICA is true.
 
If Obama has done something illegal and you can prove it in a court of law by all means bung him in prison for the rest of his life.
I have zero problem with that.
Until then all you have is allegations and talking points to try and distract from the current disastrous administration.
Bingo
 

Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup'

So has it been released yet so we all can read it?​

 

Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup'​

So has it been released yet so we all can read it?​



My view now is that Gabby is editing and jumping to conclusions about people who really did the research and didn't jump to conclusions. She has a lot of theories and no evidence.
 

Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup'​

So has it been released yet so we all can read it?​


I forgot, Patel has this ruse going - anything they can forge came from a burn bag that they found in a hidden room.
 

Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup'​

So has it been released yet so we all can read it?​


Come to think of it, I haven't heard anything about Gabbydocs or Patelies in a week except for this stupid thread.
 
<laughing>

There's no victory as sweet as those that are self-declared.
The fact that you don’t know which party defended jailed RIOTERS and pushed to DEFUND police pretty much disqualifies you from debating this issue. You simply don’t have a clue. So all you have is distraction.

I gave you proof that protesters were 80 percent Democrat. While there is no stats on violent rioters political affiliation, it’s very safe to assume that they would reflect to breakdown of the protesters or reflect an even higher concentration of democrats. Why you ask?????

Because as the violence begins the concentration of minorities rises. Blacks vote overwhelmingly democrat.

Because the groups known for becoming violent, BLM and Antifa, are left behind after the good folks leave and the violence begins. Both overwhelmingly support democrats.

Because looting is the main reason for the violence and democrat demographics are highly prone to looting.

Because the democrat party is never going to back republicans. And democrat politicians backed these violent rioters to include bailing out violent rioters arrested and jailed. The party even adopted the defund police movement. Essentially the party was getting behind its voters lol.
 
The fact that you don’t know which party defended jailed RIOTERS and pushed to DEFUND police pretty much disqualifies you from debating this issue. You simply don’t have a clue. So all you have is distraction.

I gave you proof that protesters were 80 percent Democrat. While there is no stats on violent rioters political affiliation, it’s very safe to assume that they would reflect to breakdown of the protesters or reflect an even higher concentration of democrats. Why you ask?????

Because as the violence begins the concentration of minorities rises. Blacks vote overwhelmingly democrat.

Because the groups known for becoming violent, BLM and Antifa, are left behind after the good folks leave and the violence begins. Both overwhelmingly support democrats.

Because looting is the main reason for the violence and democrat demographics are highly prone to looting.

Because the democrat party is never going to back republicans. And democrat politicians backed these violent rioters to include bailing out violent rioters arrested and jailed. The party even adopted the defund police movement. Essentially the party was getting behind its voters lol.
And let’s remember Kamala Harris solicited funds to bailout rioters.
 
The fact that you don’t know which party defended jailed RIOTERS and pushed to DEFUND police pretty much disqualifies you from debating this issue. You simply don’t have a clue. So all you have is distraction.

I gave you proof that protesters were 80 percent Democrat. While there is no stats on violent rioters political affiliation, it’s very safe to assume that they would reflect to breakdown of the protesters or reflect an even higher concentration of democrats. Why you ask?????

Because as the violence begins the concentration of minorities rises. Blacks vote overwhelmingly democrat.

Because the groups known for becoming violent, BLM and Antifa, are left behind after the good folks leave and the violence begins. Both overwhelmingly support democrats.

Because looting is the main reason for the violence and democrat demographics are highly prone to looting.

Because the democrat party is never going to back republicans. And democrat politicians backed these violent rioters to include bailing out violent rioters arrested and jailed. The party even adopted the defund police movement. Essentially the party was getting behind its voters lol.

Did the BLM rioters intend to remove Trump from office? Did the BLM riots have a constitutional objective?

The point is that all you have here is a big fat whataboutism. BLM cannot possibly do anything that suddenly makes trump innocent. Trump is guilty of his crimes and others are responsible for their own crimes. Trump is not exonerated by BLM actions. Trump still is responsible for J6 and BLM is not responsible for J6. That's your whataboutism
 
And let’s remember Kamala Harris solicited funds to bailout rioters.
Which extends the stupid whataboutism.
BLM cannot possibly do anything that suddenly makes trump innocent. Trump is guilty of his crimes and others are responsible for their own crimes. Trump is not exonerated by BLM actions. Trump still is responsible for J6 and BLM is not responsible for J6. That's your whataboutism
 
The fact that you don’t know which party defended jailed RIOTERS and pushed to DEFUND police pretty much disqualifies you from debating this issue. You simply don’t have a clue. So all you have is distraction.

I gave you proof that protesters were 80 percent Democrat. While there is no stats on violent rioters political affiliation, it’s very safe to assume that they would reflect to breakdown of the protesters or reflect an even higher concentration of democrats. Why you ask?????

Because as the violence begins the concentration of minorities rises. Blacks vote overwhelmingly democrat.

Because the groups known for becoming violent, BLM and Antifa, are left behind after the good folks leave and the violence begins. Both overwhelmingly support democrats.

Because looting is the main reason for the violence and democrat demographics are highly prone to looting.

Because the democrat party is never going to back republicans. And democrat politicians backed these violent rioters to include bailing out violent rioters arrested and jailed. The party even adopted the defund police movement. Essentially the party was getting behind its voters lol.
<laughing>

You were talking about rioters. To prove your point, you posted a poll about protesters, not rioters.

You literally checkmated yourself.
 
Too bad they didn't get to this illegal sooner. CA gave him a CDL.

Trump admin previously denied him entry but later Biden let him in.

Idiots!




No remorse and three dead innocent Americans because of leftist filth.

A crime that never should have happened. The politicians that allow this to happen should be jailed and sued into bankruptcy.

Imagine that they can be allowed to violate federal law without repercussions. All for votes and power. Disgusting and pathetic.
 
I said the ICA included efforts Russia took to influence our election. Not that they had influenced it. Obama knew they hadn’t been successful which is why demanding a new one highlighting those failed efforts is so damning. He did it solely to jive nicely with what Hillary was making up. Its called a conspiracy.

That's a dumb claim. Where does the ICA say anything about collusion? Quote Obama on that. You keep claiming this from your imagination.

He ordered that the IC tell the truth and they did.

Show me any conclusion that you think isn't correct.
 
That's a dumb claim. Where does the ICA say anything about collusion? Quote Obama on that. You keep claiming this from your imagination.

He ordered that the IC tell the truth and they did.

Show me any conclusion that you think isn't correct.
Same place from where his claim the 2020 rioters were Democrats originated.
 
That isn't what happened at all.

Trump's refusal to return the material that he had no right to have... that he lied about not having... which would have been considered a bad thing for anyone else became a strength for him because his followers are in a cult who all they need is some magic words said to them i.e. Russia said three times and they shut off all rational thought.
TDS has shut off any rational thought from you folks long ago.

For example you ignore the fact that the FBI had already visited his home and seen what he had. They asked him to lock the closet while they determined if he was allowed to keep them or not legally. They came with 30 agents and 15 vehicles vs just a few for all others including John Bolton. They knew Trump wasn’t home at the time and had already gotten secret service cooperation yet still brought 6 plus times the norm. They pulled jurisdiction from the Miami office and had Washington take over……all to grab some boxes. It was a giant shit show designed to make Trump look like a criminal and it backfired on them.

The cult are the TDS sufferers who shit on everything Trump does no matter how good.
 
Back
Top Bottom