Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup'

[Daddyo]

Esteemed legal scholar, indeed.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/17/california-court-john-eastman-disbarment-00411266

Happened in 2020 not 2025. He WAS esteemed at the time. Which was the point.

 

[Daddyo]

Party membership isn’t required to be anti-Traitor Trump. You really have no excuse for not knowing this fact by now.

There are many, many millions of Americans associated with every and no political party that recognize Traitor Trump for the anti-constitution, anti-American piece of shit that he is.

Biden didn’t pardon himself, and neither can Traitor Trump.

Those you call a traitor seem to be fixing this country while those you support destroy it lol.

And there are more millions of Americans that recognize Trump as the one candidate capable of fixing the giant ****ing mess your candidate got us in.

 

[Daddyo]

Is that another AI claim? What was the prompt? Which AI service did you use?



I don't remember you posting anything true.




That's not the truth.

You might have noticed I cited an article, but I noticed you didn't. "Heavily armed" is extremely misleading. One guy with a rifle doesn't mean heavily armed. Your post is totally exaggerated and contrary to fact.



He ordered that they be more explicit and tell the American people what Russia did. There were tons of repetitive evidence that they saw after the election that confirmed the previous assessments.

If you're griping about executive power above, then does Obama have the authority to tell the IC to tell the truth?

Every finding in the ICA is correct.

Please show me what finding or conclusion in the ICA was changed.




The assessments didn't change. There was more verified, supporting, corroborated, obvious evidence collected after the election. Obama did his duty to tell the American people the truth.

Doesn’t matter because it’s true the courts haven’t determined yet.

Just because you live in a fantasy land doesn’t mean what I post is untrue. Take the above for example. The president has the authority to declassify and how exactly it needs to be done is still up in the air. I was truthful and you called it a lie. Same for the FBI raid on trumps home. For law enforcement a long gun is considered heavily armed. Usually reserved for swat members or special occasions. Again I was truthful and you called it a lie.

Just to test your abilities to worm out of a jam why would FBI agents feel the need to carry rifles while retrieving some boxes? The secret service was already cooperating and had the facility completely secured. Also why would they need 30 agents?

Obama ordered that the new ICA highlight those efforts. You say it was to better inform the American people to how Russia tried even though those efforts failed. Moronic reason at best. They failed but we want you to know all the ways they failed. Now in highlighting these failed methods Obama made it appear as if Russia had an impact. Add to this the fact that Lisa Page was reporting the Hillary/Russia hacking server issue and her fake dossier directly to Obama. Now it becomes clear why the assessment was ordered changed. Now the conspiracy begins to take shape. Now it makes sense what Strzok was referring to when he told Page not to worry about Trump winning because they had an insurance policy should it happen.

See bud to someone capable of thinking critically, saying don’t worry if he wins we have an insurance policy if he does, means there is a plot against Trump should he win. Either assassination or something else. It’s quite obvious that the something else was the ensuing lawfare that was brought to bare against him.

 

[Daddyo]

Yes, I do know the answer. The attempt is the problem. If an attempt to interfere in the election is ok with us it will never end.

The ICA has the words "activities and intentions" in 6 headings. The intent is the crime. The ICA says they have no way to measure the effect of Putins' actions.

Yet they say those action had no effect in changing the election.

 

[Daddyo]

It false that it was many. Your list is wrong, it was 8 states & DC. And it's false that they all reverted their policies. 4 of the 8 states were doing that even before the 2020 election and all still do.

Table 18: States With All-Mail Elections

These tables are part of the Voting Outside the Polling Place report and shows which states have all-mail ballot elections.

www.ncsl.org

And only ONE of those states was a swing state. And no one complained about any of the others.

We aren’t talking about normal. The rules changed in many states because of Covid. Just for that one election. What I posted was correct. Do your research on what changed because of Covid for the 2020 election. It’s not that dang hard to follow bud. Christ.

 

[soap box]

Doesn’t matter because it’s true the courts haven’t determined yet.

Just because you live in a fantasy land doesn’t mean what I post is untrue. Take the above for example. The president has the authority to declassify and how exactly it needs to be done is still up in the air. I was truthful and you called it a lie. Same for the FBI raid on trumps home. For law enforcement a long gun is considered heavily armed. Usually reserved for swat members or special occasions. Again I was truthful and you called it a lie.

I cited the law he was charged with.
You didn't quote anything. I quoted the law he was charged with.
You didn't quote anything.

Just to test your abilities to worm out of a jam why would FBI agents feel the need to carry rifles while retrieving some boxes? The secret service was already cooperating and had the facility completely secured. Also why would they need 30 agents?

There was only one agent with a rifle. You didn't quote anything. I don't believe you. I've read plenty that contradicts your claim.

Obama ordered that the new ICA highlight those efforts. You say it was to better inform the American people to how Russia tried even though those efforts failed. Moronic reason at best. They failed but we want you to know all the ways they failed. Now in highlighting these failed methods Obama made it appear as if Russia had an impact. Add to this the fact that Lisa Page was reporting the Hillary/Russia hacking server issue and her fake dossier directly to Obama. Now it becomes clear why the assessment was ordered changed. Now the conspiracy begins to take shape. Now it makes sense what Strzok was referring to when he told Page not to worry about Trump winning because they had an insurance policy should it happen.

I'm sorry your conspiracy theories are bothering you. It's called cognitive dissonance.

See bud to someone capable of thinking critically, saying don’t worry if he wins we have an insurance policy if he does, means there is a plot against Trump should he win. Either assassination or something else. It’s quite obvious that the something else was the ensuing lawfare that was brought to bare against him.

Strock didn't change anything.

Trump is a crook and a liar.

 

[soap box]

Yet they say those action had no effect in changing the election.

Correct.

 

[Jezcoe]

TDS has shut off any rational thought from you folks long ago.

For example you ignore the fact that the FBI had already visited his home and seen what he had. They asked him to lock the closet while they determined if he was allowed to keep them or not legally. They came with 30 agents and 15 vehicles vs just a few for all others including John Bolton. They knew Trump wasn’t home at the time and had already gotten secret service cooperation yet still brought 6 plus times the norm. They pulled jurisdiction from the Miami office and had Washington take over……all to grab some boxes. It was a giant shit show designed to make Trump look like a criminal and it backfired on them.

The cult are the TDS sufferers who shit on everything Trump does no matter how good.

Don't leave out the part where the Trump team was moving those boxes around Mar-A-lago even after they had been told to keep them under lock.

 

[Rogue Valley]

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

As everyone knows, ZeroHedge is a far-right conspiracy website.....

Overall, we rate ZeroHedge an extreme right-biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.

ZeroHedge - Bias and Credibility

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.

mediabiasfactcheck.com

 

[Daddyo]

Just to confirm, the intent is what the discuss in the ICA. They wrote that they have no way to measure the impact. The intent is the problem and that's what the ICA is about. If you said conspiracy, then you can show that Clinton was colluding with the IC.

The investigation just began. Clinton had zero authority to collude. It would have been Obama colluding with Clinton and thus changing the wording in the ICA to bolster her made up bullshit Russian collusion accusation.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Those you call a traitor seem to be fixing this country …

Paraphrasing your orange Jesus, what you seem to be seeing, and what you seem to be reading isn’t what’s happening.

And there are more millions of Americans that recognize Trump as the one candidate capable of fixing the giant ****ing mess your candidate got us in.

Traitor Trump isn’t a candidate any longer, and many of those that voted for him no longer support him.

A fact supported by every reputable pollster.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Happened in 2020 not 2025. He WAS esteemed at the time. Which was the point.

Very wrongly so. Clearly.

Yet they say those action had no effect in changing the election.

Anyone capable of critical thought understands that there is no way to know if Putin’s meddling had any effect on the election.

 

[Jagged]

Doesn’t matter because it’s true the courts haven’t determined yet.

Just because you live in a fantasy land doesn’t mean what I post is untrue. Take the above for example. The president has the authority to declassify and how exactly it needs to be done is still up in the air. I was truthful and you called it a lie. Same for the FBI raid on trumps home. For law enforcement a long gun is considered heavily armed. Usually reserved for swat members or special occasions. Again I was truthful and you called it a lie.

Just to test your abilities to worm out of a jam why would FBI agents feel the need to carry rifles while retrieving some boxes? The secret service was already cooperating and had the facility completely secured. Also why would they need 30 agents?

Obama ordered that the new ICA highlight those efforts. You say it was to better inform the American people to how Russia tried even though those efforts failed. Moronic reason at best. They failed but we want you to know all the ways they failed. Now in highlighting these failed methods Obama made it appear as if Russia had an impact. Add to this the fact that Lisa Page was reporting the Hillary/Russia hacking server issue and her fake dossier directly to Obama. Now it becomes clear why the assessment was ordered changed. Now the conspiracy begins to take shape. Now it makes sense what Strzok was referring to when he told Page not to worry about Trump winning because they had an insurance policy should it happen.

See bud to someone capable of thinking critically, saying don’t worry if he wins we have an insurance policy if he does, means there is a plot against Trump should he win. Either assassination or something else. It’s quite obvious that the something else was the ensuing lawfare that was brought to bare against him.

He admitted not all of it was declassified. Who knows why you refuse to acknowledge that? And the process is not up in the air. An executive order was passed years ago, outlining the process.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

He admitted not all of it was declassified. Who knows why you refuse to acknowledge that?

I do, and I bet you do too.

 

[Jagged]

We aren’t talking about normal. The rules changed in many states because of Covid. Just for that one election. What I posted was correct. Do your research on what changed because of Covid for the 2020 election. It’s not that dang hard to follow bud. Christ.

We're talking about your BS claims of unsolicited ballots. Eight states + DC did that in 2020. Half of those states had already been mailing out unsolicited ballots in previous elections with no concerns. In 2020, only one of those eight states was a swing state Trump balked about. He didn't complain about the other seven, some of which, he won.

Complaining about unsolicited ballots is just more rightwing lying to make it look like the 2020 election was stolen from Trump.

 

[Jagged]

Don't leave out the part where the Trump team was moving those boxes around Mar-A-lago even after they had been told to keep them under lock.

Yeah, I can't imagine why the FBI had to go into Mar-a-Lago to retrieve classified material? It's not like this was a threat to national security.

 

[soap box]

The investigation just began. Clinton had zero authority to collude. It would have been Obama colluding with Clinton and thus changing the wording in the ICA to bolster her made up bullshit Russian collusion accusation.

Obama is supposed to run the IC. How is that collusion? Would you say the head of the executive branch has no power over the IC?

If you said conspiracy, then you can show that Clinton was colluding with the IC. Like a real example, dates , names, something.

 

[Daddyo]

<laughing>

"...even if there was proof."

"If," that's funny.

That's the reason I don't believe it, because there was no proof. Going on 5 years later and there's still no proof. And you're wrong again. I would have believed it had there been proof.

You ask for proof constantly only to continue the same garbage after it’s given.

Do you believe that E Jean Carroll schemed against Trump by claiming he raped her decades ago? I gave you proof that she said she was going to yet you still call Trump a sexual abuser. So when you say that you would believe with proof it’s a lie.

There is plenty of evidence that suggests there was a problem in 2020. I listed them in detail several times. There is no direct physical evidence because the proof was discarded. The proof being the voter signed envelopes. So while there was abnormally high mail in and overall vote numbers we have no way of determining if it was organic or cheating.

I have never seen a weaker Democrat candidate in my life than Biden. Even Harris was better. Yet Biden got more votes than the best Democrat candidate in my lifetime, Obama.

I have never seen a Democrat with less minority support than Biden in my lifetime.

I had never seen less supporting political advertising like yard signs and intersection rallies.

Finally I had never seen a less enthusiastic Democrat constituency.

Contrast that with Trump. Got more votes than his first run which always means victory. Got more minorities support than his first run. Had massive enthusiasm and energy from his constituency. There was no longer a fear for openly showing your support and it showed.

Finally and the most telling thing for me albeit a personal thing was in my political debates at work. For over three decades I have debated presidential politics with my gun shop customers mostly minority customers. Black customers absolutely hated republicans. The few who supported republicans would never openly say so for fear from friends and family. While there was still plenty of hate for the Republican amongst blacks in 2020 there was much more OPEN support for Trump. Far more than in 2016. So much so that there simply was no way Biden could win. At least not Florida.

Now you will poke fun and talk shit about the anecdotal evidence and that’s your right. Just like it’s my right to point out how the only election with the less secured mail in voting, due to the Covid pandemic, just so happened to have a massive spike in votes and the garbage candidate outshines the best one ever, Barack Obama lol.

 

[soap box]

You ask for proof constantly only to continue the same garbage after it’s given.

Do you believe that E Jean Carroll schemed against Trump by claiming he raped her decades ago? I gave you proof that she said she was going to yet you still call Trump a sexual abuser. So when you say that you would believe with proof it’s a lie.

There is plenty of evidence that suggests there was a problem in 2020. I listed them in detail several times. There is no direct physical evidence because the proof was discarded. The proof being the voter signed envelopes. So while there was abnormally high mail in and overall vote numbers we have no way of determining if it was organic or cheating.

I have never seen a weaker Democrat candidate in my life than Biden. Even Harris was better. Yet Biden got more votes than the best Democrat candidate in my lifetime, Obama.

I have never seen a Democrat with less minority support than Biden in my lifetime.

I had never seen less supporting political advertising like yard signs and intersection rallies.

Finally I had never seen a less enthusiastic Democrat constituency.

Contrast that with Trump. Got more votes than his first run which always means victory. Got more minorities support than his first run. Had massive enthusiasm and energy from his constituency. There was no longer a fear for openly showing your support and it showed.

Finally and the most telling thing for me albeit a personal thing was in my political debates at work. For over three decades I have debated presidential politics with my gun shop customers mostly minority customers. Black customers absolutely hated republicans. The few who supported republicans would never openly say so for fear from friends and family. While there was still plenty of hate for the Republican amongst blacks in 2020 there was much more OPEN support for Trump. Far more than in 2016. So much so that there simply was no way Biden could win. At least not Florida.

Now you will poke fun and talk shit about the anecdotal evidence and that’s your right. Just like it’s my right to point out how the only election with the less secured mail in voting, due to the Covid pandemic, just so happened to have a massive spike in votes and the garbage candidate outshines the best one ever, Barack Obama lol.

Nope, Trump lost.

Lost, Not Stolen

The Conservative Case that Trump Lost and Biden Won the 2020 Presidential Election

lostnotstolen.org

 

[VySky]

Nope, Trump lost.

Lost, Not Stolen

The Conservative Case that Trump Lost and Biden Won the 2020 Presidential Election

lostnotstolen.org

lostnotstolen.com.

Well that settles it then.

 

[soap box]

lostnotstolen.com.

Well that settles it then.

Guess who wrote that report. Read it n weep.

You can't refute a single line in this report so your post here is a big ol zero.

 

[Jagged]

You ask for proof constantly only to continue the same garbage after it’s given.

Do you believe that E Jean Carroll schemed against Trump by claiming he raped her decades ago? I gave you proof that she said she was going to yet you still call Trump a sexual abuser. So when you say that you would believe with proof it’s a lie.

There is plenty of evidence that suggests there was a problem in 2020. I listed them in detail several times. There is no direct physical evidence because the proof was discarded. The proof being the voter signed envelopes. So while there was abnormally high mail in and overall vote numbers we have no way of determining if it was organic or cheating.

I have never seen a weaker Democrat candidate in my life than Biden. Even Harris was better. Yet Biden got more votes than the best Democrat candidate in my lifetime, Obama.

I have never seen a Democrat with less minority support than Biden in my lifetime.

I had never seen less supporting political advertising like yard signs and intersection rallies.

Finally I had never seen a less enthusiastic Democrat constituency.

Contrast that with Trump. Got more votes than his first run which always means victory. Got more minorities support than his first run. Had massive enthusiasm and energy from his constituency. There was no longer a fear for openly showing your support and it showed.

Finally and the most telling thing for me albeit a personal thing was in my political debates at work. For over three decades I have debated presidential politics with my gun shop customers mostly minority customers. Black customers absolutely hated republicans. The few who supported republicans would never openly say so for fear from friends and family. While there was still plenty of hate for the Republican amongst blacks in 2020 there was much more OPEN support for Trump. Far more than in 2016. So much so that there simply was no way Biden could win. At least not Florida.

Now you will poke fun and talk shit about the anecdotal evidence and that’s your right. Just like it’s my right to point out how the only election with the less secured mail in voting, due to the Covid pandemic, just so happened to have a massive spike in votes and the garbage candidate outshines the best one ever, Barack Obama lol.

Your subjective opinions are not proof. Hiding behind your imagination that proof was conveniently discarded does nothing to bolster your claims. Actually, it weakens them.

All you're stuck with is Trump setting you up before the election with how he was going to cry election fraud if he loses. Then crying election fraud when he lost. Then losing case after case after case in court. Then having every single claim of election fraud debunked. Then getting himself indicted for illegally trying to steal the election he lost. Then having his attorneys disbarred for lying about election fraud for him. And despite all of that, you're still duped. Not a good look for you.

 

[Daddyo]

And if Trump was given advice he could shoot someone on fifth avenue, would you care if he did?

Oh, and again, he got advice to flip the election, making him and Pence the winner.

What a stupid question and completely imbecilic comparison.

Now had you compared it to the advice Obama received, that he could legalize dreamers, after he himself admitted that he couldn’t do that because he wasn’t a king, that would be better.

 

[Daddyo]

Yes, the president can. There is no record that Trump ever did regarding some of the documents found in his possession.

He said that he did. Again there is no set in stone, court vetted, way to declassify. Perhaps there should be but there is not. So someone guilty of taking top secret documents home will get off Scott free by claiming they did. Just like Biden, Hillary, and Pence got off Scott free only they had zero defense, none, nada, not even the lame one Trump used.

You know why they got off? They were democrats or against Trump. Giving them back doesn’t absolve them of the crime. Just as robbing a bank and then returning the money doesn’t absolve the robber.

 

[The Brad Dad]

He said that he did. Again there is no set in stone, court vetted, way to declassify. Perhaps there should be but there is not. So someone guilty of taking top secret documents home will get off Scott free by claiming they did. Just like Biden, Hillary, and Pence got off Scott free only they had zero defense, none, nada, not even the lame one Trump used.

You know why they got off? They were democrats or against Trump. Giving them back doesn’t absolve them of the crime. Just as robbing a bank and then returning the money doesn’t absolve the robber.

They cooperated with federal authorities, whereas Trump actively defied the investigation. It's weird that those Democrats would want to attack Trump but let Pence off the hook.