Yes “looks like” but appearances have been known to be inaccurate, a mirage, mislead.
As more and more of these formerly classified documents are made public, it's only going to grow, like a snowball rolling downhill. I think we are only at the very start of it, and sure, I complete get that the left wants to dismiss them out of hand now, because as that snowball grows, it'll be impossible to do so later.
From space and photos the earth “looks likel” its flat, along with the sun and moon. A ball, tossed up in the air of car vehicle traveling 100mph, is also traveling 100mph despite the it doesn’t “look like” the ball is traveling 100mph.
Irrelevant, and a very bad analogy.
Presently the strongest position, in light of the anemic evidence, is “looks like” but nothing more, and “looks like” is of low persuasiveness.
So, what is the evidence showing as factual or true or very likely true, more likely than not, your statements?
Whether what was done is fraud, or not, is going to be the DOJ's decision, dependent on the case they bring, if they do, and the charges they file, if they do.
Appearances are that a sizable cabal of Democrats and their supporters, financial and otherwise, were involved in the conspiracy to push the Russian Collusion hoax, Trump being a Russian asset, Trump being an illegitimate president, including, but not limited to, a sitting and exiting president using federal intel agencies to lend credibility to the Russian Collusion hoax, weaponizing and using those agencies as political weapons against domestic political opposition.
I find it concerning that you seem to want to sweep all that under the rug, rather than to expose it to the bright, disinfecting sunlight. My concern is that if there is no deterrence to a recurrence of this, it'll become precedent and a permanent fixture in the future.