Though he blamed the reversal on Democrats and the media...
President Donald Trump reversed his decision to host the next G7 summit at his private golf club after being told that Republicans objected to the idea, an administration official told The Washington Post.
I'm not even sure this guy can speak the truth. I can't recall a single instance when he spoke without some form of distortion or exaggeration of what the facts really said.
Maybe this is a dumb question but if doing the G7 at Doral could be done for less money than doing it elsewhere (comparable elsewhere. I'm not talking about doing it at the Holiday Inn on the south side) would it still be a problem for you guys?
Who owns Doral?
Does that answer your stupid question?
So spending MORE taxpayer money just so the event isn't at a Trump property is the priority for the left.
...and I'm stupid.
I think I'm seeing how this works for you guys.
Maybe this is a dumb question but if doing the G7 at Doral could be done for less money than doing it elsewhere (comparable elsewhere. I'm not talking about doing it at the Holiday Inn on the south side) would it still be a problem for you guys?
Maybe this is a dumb question but if doing the G7 at Doral could be done for less money than doing it elsewhere (comparable elsewhere. I'm not talking about doing it at the Holiday Inn on the south side) would it still be a problem for you guys?
I mean technically that's a half truth. Democrats, the Media and Republicans all explained to him that it would violate the law for him to host the event there. So yeah it was our fault for...you know...demanding that the laws of our country be enforced.
Maybe this is a dumb question but if doing the G7 at Doral could be done for less money than doing it elsewhere (comparable elsewhere. I'm not talking about doing it at the Holiday Inn on the south side) would it still be a problem for you guys?
Yes, it would be problem. Trump owns the place and no doubt saw an opportunity for some easy money.
So spending MORE taxpayer money just so the event isn't at a Trump property is the priority for the left.
...and I'm stupid.
I think I'm seeing how this works for you guys.
Maybe this is a dumb question but if doing the G7 at Doral could be done for less money than doing it elsewhere (comparable elsewhere. I'm not talking about doing it at the Holiday Inn on the south side) would it still be a problem for you guys?
Maybe this is a dumb question, but if the President making big bucks off a function of the Federal government isn't an unacceptable degree of corruption, what would be?
Yes, because it's also free advertising and it's difficult to get a clear sense of what the financial gains are for the owner.
Moreover, let's say I owned a crappy hotel where the G7 would cost 1/10th the usual cost, wouldn't I still be enriching myself by awarding myself the contract?
Maybe this is a dumb question, but if the President making big bucks off a function of the Federal government isn't an unacceptable degree of corruption, what would be?
Edit- I mean, this is exactly the same as him giving a government contract to his own company. Exactly the same. Maybe he should contract building a thirty-foot wall on the border.
So spending MORE taxpayer money just so the event isn't at a Trump property is the priority for the left.
...and I'm stupid.
I think I'm seeing how this works for you guys.
Yes, because it's also free advertising and it's difficult to get a clear sense of what the financial gains are for the owner.
Moreover, let's say I owned a crappy hotel where the G7 would cost 1/10th the usual cost, wouldn't I still be enriching myself by awarding myself the contract?
So spending MORE taxpayer money just so the event isn't at a Trump property is the priority for the left.
...and I'm stupid.
I think I'm seeing how this works for you guys.
Maybe this is a dumb question but if doing the G7 at Doral could be done for less money than doing it elsewhere (comparable elsewhere. I'm not talking about doing it at the Holiday Inn on the south side) would it still be a problem for you guys?
If his company can pull off the job as effectively and at lower cost than the competition then it’s STILL a good deal for the taxpayer.
Maybe this is a dumb question but if doing the G7 at Doral could be done for less money than doing it elsewhere (comparable elsewhere. I'm not talking about doing it at the Holiday Inn on the south side) would it still be a problem for you guys?
Maybe this is a dumb question but if doing the G7 at Doral could be done for less money than doing it elsewhere (comparable elsewhere. I'm not talking about doing it at the Holiday Inn on the south side) would it still be a problem for you guys?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?