From the FEC--the acceptable error rate

[Irwin Corey]

"For testing purposes,

Trump lost. <-period!

 

[armycowboy]

Oh I know, nothing I post on this site is meant for them, but others more open to truth.

The extremely gullible and ignorant are open to this "truth." The rest of us are pointing and laughing at you all.

 

[BlueTex]

The "error rate" referred to in the OP has nothing to do with hardware or software...unless they have been manipulated to give more errors than actually exist.

Really... What error rate is it specifying? Let's hear your expert explanation... LMAO

 

[Mycroft]

Really... What error rate is it specifying? Let's hear your expert explanation... LMAO

It's talking about the machines detecting errors in the ballots that are being scanned. The number of ballots kicked out compared to the number of ballots scanned is the "error rate".

Why is this important? Because the machine is adjustable, which means if incorrectly set, the machine will kick out more ballots for adjudication. Those ballots are then "judged" by humans...and that's when the election fraud happens. (At least, that is one of the fraud tactics that were used.)

 

[iguanaman]

"For testing purposes, the acceptable error rate is defined using two parameters: the desired error rate to be achieved, and the maximum error rate that should be accepted by the test process. For each processing function indicated above, the system shall achieve a target error rate of no more than one in 10,000,000 ballot positions, with a maximum acceptable error rate in the test process of one in 500,000 ballot positions. "

https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/eac_assets/1/28/Voting_System_Standards_Volume_I.pdf

It's a huge site.....here is the page # where it can be found, to see yourself.....3.2.1 Accuracy requirements, pg 3-51.


Here, they state the importance in having such a low error rate, but a high accuracy count:

"Required accuracy is defined in terms of an error rate that for testing purposes represents the maximum number of errors allowed while processing a specified volume of data. This rate is set at a sufficiently stringent level such that the likelihood of voting system errors affecting the outcome of an election is exceptionally remote even in the closest of elections."

As you can see, the maximum acceptable error rate is one in 500,000 ballot positions.....that is NOT what was found with Dominion in both Michigan and Nevada, but an error rate of 68% to 70% error rate. My question is, just what kind of voting machine is this?

It's hard for me to understand why each and every Dominion machine has not been taken and audited to be sure, for the sake of this Presidential election. It's paramount for voter security and to keep and preserve the great freedom we have in this country, not to be taken lightly.

Where is the FEC.....do they even exist anymore? With such a close election can we now grasp and understand why it's so important for voting machines to have such high standards for accuracy. Yet, it was not, no where even close, not even in the same universe.....acceptable is way less than 1%, established by the FEC.....Dominion is 68% to 70%....pretty bad.

Stop lying. No one said any voting machine had a error rate of 68 to 70%. That is ridiculous.

 

[BlueTex]

It's talking about the machines detecting errors in the ballots that are being scanned. The number of ballots kicked out compared to the number of ballots scanned is the "error rate".

Why is this important? Because the machine is adjustable, which means if incorrectly set, the machine will kick out more ballots for adjudication. Those ballots are then "judged" by humans...and that's when the election fraud happens. (At least, that is one of the fraud tactics that were used.)

And why do you suppose when they updated the standard in 2015 they included this:




By the way, the standard cited by the OP is no longer applicable, it's the 2015 standard that applies. Why do you suppose these standards are voluntary?

 

[j brown's body]

It's talking about the machines detecting errors in the ballots that are being scanned. The number of ballots kicked out compared to the number of ballots scanned is the "error rate".

Why is this important? Because the machine is adjustable, which means if incorrectly set, the machine will kick out more ballots for adjudication. Those ballots are then "judged" by humans...and that's when the election fraud happens. (At least, that is one of the fraud tactics that were used.)

Which court was this accusation of fraud laughed out of?

 

[j brown's body]

You've proven that you don't care about the truth. Dominion is going to sue the pants off those who make the absurd claims you foolishly believe.

They did a hand recount in Georgia. No machines. Trump lost. Get over it.

Even Newsmax had to retract their false claims about Dominion.

These guys just keep peddling the same old discredited stories over and over again. Its unbelievable.

 

[armycowboy]

These guys just keep peddling the same old discredited stories over and over again. Its unbelievable.

They're pretty committed at this point. They'll never admit Biden won.

 

[Visbek]

Where, all I've seen is blah, blah, blah...

You mean, someone who is committed already to a position doesn't believe the evidence to the contrary? What a surprise.

Can you show me an audit of a Dominion voting machine used in the election which showed an error rate of 1 in 500,000?

You can start here, by realizing that the "68%" claim is simply bullshit.

Audit in Michigan County Refutes Dominion Conspiracy Theory - FactCheck.org

A hand count of paper ballots in Antrim County, Michigan, has verified the election results there, refuting a “forensics report” promoted by President Donald Trump that baselessly claimed the election equipment in the county was “designed” to create “systemic fraud and influence election...

www.factcheck.org

Out of curiosity, just want to know what is going on with the FEC, when voting machines are spewing out an error rate of 68%, when it's way over their standards.....I have this right.

You don't have jack.

As already noted, your "68% claim" is garbage.

The FEC also doesn't control election machines. They set voluntary standards, that only a handful of states utilize. It is also up to the counties and states to run audits, to check the machines, and so on. (You did notice that your document is from 2002, right? No, obviously not.)

For the most part, I can agree with you, but it is in the swing states in just a few democratic controlled counties, wherein the election was anything but fair.

LOL... Oh, how convenient.

Spare us the nonsense. If North Carolina voted for Biden instead of Trump, you'd be whining about "a few Democratic controlled counties" there too.

This has nothing to do with any "inaccuracies." It's because your guy lost, and you can't handle it.

 

[Visbek]

I am well aware of the excuse of a clerk failing to update the media drives on those machines.....

It's not an excuse. It's what happened.

Oh, and Trump won in Antrim County. Not only did he win, but the paper ballot tally matched the corrected digital tally.

but that does not explain the same high error rate they found in Nevada.

 

[Mycroft]

And why do you suppose when they updated the standard in 2015 they included this:

View attachment 67310443


By the way, the standard cited by the OP is no longer applicable, it's the 2015 standard that applies. Why do you suppose these standards are voluntary?

Doesn't matter. The error rate, in different counties and states was up in the 68-70% range. MUCH TOO HIGH!! And it was deliberate.

 

[pocket aces]

The difference is you have NO idea what you are talking about... You are spouting off crap you are probably reading on some blog and have no idea what it actually means. Who those standards you rushed post? Are the voluntary or mandatory? What's the difference between the EAC and the FEC?

Cluelessly spouting bullshit you have read on some blog somewhere is weak...

He isn't smart enough to do anything else.

 

[BlueTex]

Doesn't matter. The error rate, in different counties and states was up in the 68-70% range. MUCH TOO HIGH!! And it was deliberate.

How is ASOG calculating the error rate? Is that consistent with the standards they are bullshitting about?

 

[Mycroft]

How is ASOG calculating the error rate? Is that consistent with the standards they are bullshitting about?

Exactly how I described...and yes, in accordance with the standards that apply.

Here, read this: https://tennesseestar.com/2020/12/1...entionally-designed-to-create-systemic-fraud/

I can't help but wonder why you don't already know this.

 

[redbeer]

Heck, the Trump haters don't even know what "error rate" means. They probably think it's about the machine making a mistake.

This situation cracks me up.....here we have such a high error rate, and they come out with the false narrative it's because some clerk somewhere did not load an update onto the media drives, then the media and democrats run with it.....and voila, puff, to them it's debunked and it's all over....I mean, you cannot make this stuff up. I guess we are all stupid, so before the media update the machine was okay with having such a high error rate, huh...that's what it was supposed to do, and in who's universe.

Then along came the state of Nevada, and guess what, the same thing.....and we're supposed to believe their bullshort.....well not me and not a lot of other people. I just would like to hear what the FEC is doing about this.....for this is some serious stuff going on in this election, and this is just one situation out of scores of others, all in a few democrat run counties in select swing states.....yeah right.

 

[redbeer]

Trump lost. <-period!

View attachment 67310441

Thanks to the democrats it is not going to be that easy, for they just can't play fair, now can they.

 

[redbeer]

The extremely gullible and ignorant are open to this "truth." The rest of us are pointing and laughing at you all.

Laugh all you want....could care less. My concerns and questions are valid and need answered from those who are supposed to clear this up, for it's their job. I am not going to rely upon the media for answers to my questions....they are liars.

 

[armycowboy]

Thanks to the democrats it is not going to be that easy, for they just can't play fair, now can they.

Ever the victim. A true Trump supporter.

 

[redbeer]

Stop lying. No one said any voting machine had a error rate of 68 to 70%. That is ridiculous.

Well, you better get you head out of the sand and look around and see what's going on.....or take those blinders off, one of the two.

 

[armycowboy]

Laugh all you want....could care less. My concerns and questions are valid and need answered from those who are supposed to clear this up, for it's their job. I am not going to rely upon the media for answers to my questions....they are liars.

Nobody owes you an explanation. Multiple judges have already laughed this drivel out of court. Accept the results or don't. Makes no matter to those of us who live in reality.

 

[Fledermaus]

Oh I know, nothing I post on this site is meant for them, but others more open to truth.

Citation for the 70%?

 

[redbeer]

You mean, someone who is committed already to a position doesn't believe the evidence to the contrary? What a surprise.



You can start here, by realizing that the "68%" claim is simply bullshit.

Audit in Michigan County Refutes Dominion Conspiracy Theory - FactCheck.org

A hand count of paper ballots in Antrim County, Michigan, has verified the election results there, refuting a “forensics report” promoted by President Donald Trump that baselessly claimed the election equipment in the county was “designed” to create “systemic fraud and influence election...

www.factcheck.org

You don't have jack.

As already noted, your "68% claim" is garbage.

The FEC also doesn't control election machines. They set voluntary standards, that only a handful of states utilize. It is also up to the counties and states to run audits, to check the machines, and so on. (You did notice that your document is from 2002, right? No, obviously not.)



LOL... Oh, how convenient.

Spare us the nonsense. If North Carolina voted for Biden instead of Trump, you'd be whining about "a few Democratic controlled counties" there too.

This has nothing to do with any "inaccuracies." It's because your guy lost, and you can't handle it.

From the left's favorite go to site, "FactCheck.org":

"The matter came down to the fact that the county clerk “accidentally did not update the software used to collect voting machine data,” the Michigan Department of State, which oversees the state’s elections, said in a Nov. 6 statement. "


Cracks me up, a clerk accidentally did not update the software, so prior to this update a 68% error rate was okay. I am sure Dominion is so reputable to NEVER have a 68% error rate, prior to the update or after the update.....save me the bs.

It not only occurred in Michigan, but the same in Nevada....is your excuse a clerk did not update the software there, too? The left got caught, came out with a bs excuse, had their operatives in the media run with it, stating it over and over in the news ad nauseum, till poof, the lemmings believe it......

 

[redbeer]

Ever the victim. A true Trump supporter.

No, just pushing back, showing the truth, and not letting the left with their allies in the media run this country anymore.....enough of the socialist, progressive, liberal bull short.....move to a different country and spread the poison.

 

[redbeer]

Nobody owes you an explanation. Multiple judges have already laughed this drivel out of court. Accept the results or don't. Makes no matter to those of us who live in reality.

Has a judge dismissed the findings of Dominion?....if so, would be interested in seeing it....please share it.