- Joined
- Sep 27, 2019
- Messages
- 20,681
- Reaction score
- 8,770
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
"For testing purposes, the acceptable error rate is defined using two parameters: the desired error rate to be achieved, and the maximum error rate that should be accepted by the test process. For each processing function indicated above, the system shall achieve a target error rate of no more than one in 10,000,000 ballot positions, with a maximum acceptable error rate in the test process of one in 500,000 ballot positions. "
It's a huge site.....here is the page # where it can be found, to see yourself.....3.2.1 Accuracy requirements, pg 3-51.
Here, they state the importance in having such a low error rate, but a high accuracy count:
"Required accuracy is defined in terms of an error rate that for testing purposes represents the maximum number of errors allowed while processing a specified volume of data. This rate is set at a sufficiently stringent level such that the likelihood of voting system errors affecting the outcome of an election is exceptionally remote even in the closest of elections."
As you can see, the maximum acceptable error rate is one in 500,000 ballot positions.....that is NOT what was found with Dominion in both Michigan and Nevada, but an error rate of 68% to 70% error rate. My question is, just what kind of voting machine is this?
It's hard for me to understand why each and every Dominion machine has not been taken and audited to be sure, for the sake of this Presidential election. It's paramount for voter security and to keep and preserve the great freedom we have in this country, not to be taken lightly.
Where is the FEC.....do they even exist anymore? With such a close election can we now grasp and understand why it's so important for voting machines to have such high standards for accuracy. Yet, it was not, no where even close, not even in the same universe.....acceptable is way less than 1%, established by the FEC.....Dominion is 68% to 70%....pretty bad.
It's a huge site.....here is the page # where it can be found, to see yourself.....3.2.1 Accuracy requirements, pg 3-51.
Here, they state the importance in having such a low error rate, but a high accuracy count:
"Required accuracy is defined in terms of an error rate that for testing purposes represents the maximum number of errors allowed while processing a specified volume of data. This rate is set at a sufficiently stringent level such that the likelihood of voting system errors affecting the outcome of an election is exceptionally remote even in the closest of elections."
As you can see, the maximum acceptable error rate is one in 500,000 ballot positions.....that is NOT what was found with Dominion in both Michigan and Nevada, but an error rate of 68% to 70% error rate. My question is, just what kind of voting machine is this?
It's hard for me to understand why each and every Dominion machine has not been taken and audited to be sure, for the sake of this Presidential election. It's paramount for voter security and to keep and preserve the great freedom we have in this country, not to be taken lightly.
Where is the FEC.....do they even exist anymore? With such a close election can we now grasp and understand why it's so important for voting machines to have such high standards for accuracy. Yet, it was not, no where even close, not even in the same universe.....acceptable is way less than 1%, established by the FEC.....Dominion is 68% to 70%....pretty bad.