• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News’ “War on Christianity”: How right-wing hacks created a sect of victims

I said nothing about getting out. In everyone's life they make decisions, what car to buy, what food to eat,what friends to have and so on. Those decisions have consequences, some good some bad some indifferent. You made the decision to live where you are. Maybe the parades were going on at the time you moved in, maybe they weren't. Doesn't really matter. You obviously like living where you are and unless someone is in some manner forcing you to watch the parade then you make the decision to be there when the parade is going on. I would have to say the parade doesn't bother you as much as you want us to believe it does or you would find a place more to your liking.

As for the "rabbit hole" thing. Not real sure what that's supposed to mean. Can you explain what it means to you?

And how does any of what you posted change the fact that residents where I live are forced to tolerate a parade that centers exclusively on a group of people and their beliefs and lifestyle?

Look, humans haven't invented the level of spin sufficient to excuse away the facts here. The agenda, lifestyle, dress, sexual antics, etc., is FORCED upon the people living in the area during the parade and weekend festival.

The only way to avoid the goings on is to abandon your home for the weekend. Exactly how do you want to explain that fact?
 
Ok, I can't write I'm surprised you think tax breaks amount to taking from others. I"m sure you're part of the welfare crowd, so I guess you see other peoples money as yours.

Again, I have written I am not against the parade. Personally, I think it's foolish for the LGBT community to prove how immature and obnoxious many of they are, but that's not my issue. The point related to things not being forced on others. That quite clearly is not the case when it comes to this type of activity.

If you go out for dinner with 3 friends (lets call this members of society contributing to and taking from) and its decided that you get a "dinner fee break", who pays for your dinner? Your friends (society) does.

This is a pretty obnoxious position of yours, not only do you think you are entitled to not pay taxes to contribute to the society you take from, but you think others receiving welfare is stealing from others. You can't have it both ways.

You're not against the parade huh? You just don't want to pay for it? So as I said earlier, you are against taxpayer funded parades then right? Since you claim that is forcing the views of the parade on others, shouldn't you be against all taxpayer funded parades?
 
So you've seen the parade too?

The parades are all about pride. It's clearly the nutter xians who are the drama queens. Trying to suggest that what someone else does forces some sort of immorality on you, complete bs.
 
If you go out for dinner with 3 friends (lets call this members of society contributing to and taking from) and its decided that you get a "dinner fee break", who pays for your dinner? Your friends (society) does.

This is a pretty obnoxious position of yours, not only do you think you are entitled to not pay taxes to contribute to the society you take from, but you think others receiving welfare is stealing from others. You can't have it both ways.

You're not against the parade huh? You just don't want to pay for it? So as I said earlier, you are against taxpayer funded parades then right? Since you claim that is forcing the views of the parade on others, shouldn't you be against all taxpayer funded parades?

I can't be any clearer for you. Obviously your agenda blinds you to the point. It has nothing to do with taxes. It has to do with being forced in the face of others. The fact its government sponsored just adds to the absurdity.

If you have any comment regarding the forced nature of the parade, I'd be glad to respond. All this other stuff you're inventing has no interest to me.
 
You stand for the same immorality and degradation which many—mostly Christians—are under attack for standing against. Professing to be a “Christian” does not change the obvious fact that you are on the opposite side of this conflict from the side predominantly held by Christians.

Apparently some Christians are "true", others not so much. I love this about religious folks. Always judging while claiming not to judge.
 
You areally should try to keep up.

Posted: 12/18/2013 3:38 pm EST Fox News Airs 'Happy Holidays' Message As Bill O'Reilly Declares Victory In War On Christmas

happyholidays.png




Fox News Airs 'Happy Holidays' Message As Bill O'Reilly Declares Victory In War On Christmas

I said good job - the picture you used before was 2005. Well done. Geeze, can't you take a compliment?
 
1.)nd how does any of what you posted change the fact that residents where I live are forced to tolerate a parade that centers exclusively on a group of people and their beliefs and lifestyle?

2.)Look, humans haven't invented the level of spin sufficient to excuse away the facts here. The agenda, lifestyle, dress, sexual antics, etc., is FORCED upon the people living in the area during the parade and weekend festival.

3.)The only way to avoid the goings on is to abandon your home for the weekend. Exactly how do you want to explain that fact?

1.) not a fact
2.) see #1
3.) see #1

sorry but your posts fails again as there are no FACTS in it. If you disagree simply support these facts or have educated and honest people continue not to take your posts seriously
 
Apparently some Christians are "true", others not so much. I love this about religious folks. Always judging while claiming not to judge.

Of course - where else would the "No True Scotsman" fallacy come from.
 
Homosexuality is a trait of some humans no different than heterosexuality. Calling it a religion or what not is a matter of perception.

The claim was that homosexual parades should be protected by the same laws that protect churches.

Which is why I asked...is homosexuality a religion?
 
Last edited:
I can't be any clearer for you. Obviously your agenda blinds you to the point. It has nothing to do with taxes. It has to do with being forced in the face of others. The fact its government sponsored just adds to the absurdity.

If you have any comment regarding the forced nature of the parade, I'd be glad to respond. All this other stuff you're inventing has no interest to me.

So you're against freedom of speech sponsored by the government?
 
Of course - where else would the "No True Scotsman" fallacy come from.
`
You have no idea what you are talking about. TC made a statement, not propose an argument....duh.
 
I said good job - the picture you used before was 2005. Well done. Geeze, can't you take a compliment?

LOL from you? That rather loud thump you heard was me falling off my chair.

falling-out-of-my-chair.jpg
 
`
You have no idea what you are talking about. TC made a statement, not propose an argument.

Thank for an example of a strawman fallacy, but I'm not claiming TC made an argument. I'm agreeing with him.
 
Thank for an example of a strawman fallacy, but I'm not claiming TC made an argument. I'm agreeing with him.

It reeks of the Palin "Real Americans" campaign rhetoric.

Unfortunately that type of nonsense permeates politics and fuels the type of divisiveness to inspire comments that those who oppose you politically are "Anti American"

It's toxic as all hell IMO.
 
The parades are all about pride. It's clearly the nutter xians who are the drama queens. Trying to suggest that what someone else does forces some sort of immorality on you, complete bs.

Pride? Well I guess. I can see that. But apparently is also pride in butt ****ing, group sex, fisting, BDSM, and many other interesting float themes.

Look, of course it's forcing. That's why it's done in a parade. It only the brainless minions of the zombie progressive tribe who have been brainwashed into suggesting otherwise. Perhaps I'm wrong, but horsetail buttplugs, and assless chaps suggest something more than "I like ponies".
 
The claim was that homosexual parades should be protected by the same laws that protect churches.

Which is why I asked...is homosexuality a religion?

I have no idea what you're talking about. Homosexual parades are freedom of speech as far as I'm concerned.
 
:lamo:2rofll:

Don't be so desperate that you have to be ridiculous.

translation: you cant defend your failed and made up strawman
 
:lamo:2rofll:

Don't be so desperate that you have to be ridiculous.

I'm trying to pin down your argument but you keep dodging and saying you mean something else. Don't be afraid to own what you think.
 
translation: you cant defend your failed and made up strawman

Uhh, just to educate: all strawman arguments are made up to begin with. It's part and parcel of the definition.
 
Pride? Well I guess. I can see that. But apparently is also pride in butt ****ing, group sex, fisting, BDSM, and many other interesting float themes.

Look, of course it's forcing. That's why it's done in a parade. It only the brainless minions of the zombie progressive tribe who have been brainwashed into suggesting otherwise. Perhaps I'm wrong, but horsetail buttplugs, and assless chaps suggest something more than "I like ponies".

It does suggest more, but it doesn't force you to do anything. I personally have never seen buttplugs or assless chaps,.... why? because I don't pay attention to things I don't choose to and that don't effect me in anyway. You seem very focused on other people's pleasure and want to control them. It's simply not your place to do so. If you don't like seeing the parade, turn away, turn off the tv news about it, leave your home for the day or the weekend and go somewhere else.

You are not the decider of what's sexually acceptable for others. Deal with it.

I am a raging prude. I don't do or receive oral. Would probably beat someone who tried anything akin to anal. Want the lights out, etc. A TOTAL prude. And there's no way in the world that I would demand anyone else to emulate my choices in their sex lives, public or private. I accept my choices for me, I suggest you learn that your choices are limited to you.
 
Uhh, just to educate: all strawman arguments are made up to begin with. It's part and parcel of the definition.
thanks captain obvious LMAO
your education fails since this information was already known.
 
Back
Top Bottom