Trump has faced four "special referendums" after he dethroned Queen Hillary. And Republicans are 4-0 in all of them. Are Trump supporters tired of winning? I don't think so. And I bet Trump haters aren't tired of losing.
The MSM said that these were referendums on Trump. Was the MSM lying?Do you have any actual evidence from the ground in each of these four congressional special elections that the campaigns there were indeed about a referendum on Trump?
I AM NOT talking about national media talking heads trying to fill air time with speculation. I am asking if you have actual evidence from the actual campaigns of the actual candidates that they turned them into a referendum about Trump?
Trump has faced four "special referendums" after he dethroned Queen Hillary. And Republicans are 4-0 in all of them. Are Trump supporters tired of winning? I don't think so. And I bet Trump haters aren't tired of losing.
1. Hillary Clinton was anointed the DNC party nomination and her coronation as president was assumed.1) Hillary would had to have been "throned" first before she could be dethroned. Kind of goes in a logical order that way.
2) What the hell are you talking about? Are you attempting some vague mind-reading thing? What "special referendums"? Any idiot can claim they're 4-0 when they don't what they're 4-0 at.
The MSM said that these were referendums on Trump. Was the MSM lying?
1. Hillary Clinton was anointed the DNC party nomination and her coronation as president was assumed.
2. Four special elections. All of them implied or outright stated to be special Referendums on Trump. Republicans won all four of them.
Do you have any actual evidence from the ground in each of these four congressional special elections that the campaigns there were indeed about a referendum on Trump?
I AM NOT talking about national media talking heads trying to fill air time with speculation. I am asking if you have actual evidence from the actual campaigns of the actual candidates that they turned them into a referendum about Trump?
A close race in a dominantly held republican district where republicans should've easily won by a landslide and didn't...is considered a referendum.
A close race in a dominantly held republican district where republicans should've easily won by a landslide and didn't...is considered a referendum.
The MSM said that these were referendums on Trump. Was the MSM lying?
Quote Originally Posted by reinoe View Post
Trump has faced four "special referendums" after he dethroned Queen Hillary. And Republicans are 4-0 in all of them. Are Trump supporters tired of winning? I don't think so. And I bet Trump haters aren't tired of losing.
Trump has faced four "special referendums" after he dethroned Queen Hillary. And Republicans are 4-0 in all of them. Are Trump supporters tired of winning? I don't think so. And I bet Trump haters aren't tired of losing.
Trump has faced four "special referendums" after he dethroned Queen Hillary. And Republicans are 4-0 in all of them. Are Trump supporters tired of winning? I don't think so. And I bet Trump haters aren't tired of losing.
In the biggie: Handel vs Ossoff, the Dems threw a lot of money at the race. Money talks. Along with the other races the Dems threw an unprecedented amount of money at those races too.
The point is that it should've been a landslide for Republicans...but it wasn't.
Republicans threw a lot of money at the races, too.
Trump has faced four "special referendums" after he dethroned Queen Hillary. And Republicans are 4-0 in all of them. Are Trump supporters tired of winning? I don't think so. And I bet Trump haters aren't tired of losing.
In the biggie: Handel vs Ossoff, the Dems threw a lot of money at the race. Money talks. Along with the other races the Dems threw an unprecedented amount of money at those races too.
The point is that it should've been a landslide for Republicans...but it wasn't.
They did, but as an example of just how much the dems spent in the Georgia 6th, there's this:
Who Financed the Georgia Sixth, the Most Expensive House Election Ever - The New York Times
Ossoff spent nearly six (!) times what Handel spent. I realize this particular contest had symbolic content for many, but if the political left wants to win back the House in 2018, this can't be the way to do it. I realize a lot could be said about this particular race and the others as well, and no doubt will be, but I'm not going to. There was simply way too much hype over these races - in particular the GA 6th. It was one House seat.
Trump has faced four "special referendums" after he dethroned Queen Hillary. And Republicans are 4-0 in all of them. Are Trump supporters tired of winning? I don't think so. And I bet Trump haters aren't tired of losing.
All four races were in what used to be safe Republican seats. All four.
Plus, you guys only have 235 other seats to defend next year!
Let me say this as straight and as clear as possible - I do not give a fifty gallon drum filled with wet stinky diarrhea what the main stream media said. I ask again Do you have any actual evidence from the ground in each of these four congressional special elections that the campaigns there were indeed about a referendum on Trump?
Here was YOUR CLAIM OF FACT
So why are you impotent to back it up with evidence from those races that they were run and contested as referendums on Trump as you claimed?
I sure hope making excuses on "Losing Day" makes you guys feel better. Losing day being ****ing always for you leftists. Good luck in 2018!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?