Yes, numerous unconstitutional infringements have been struck down by the courts. That’s what they are there for.
Nope. I don’t have 2nd amendment rights on someone else’s private property.
Sort of. But that is also working its way through the courts as we speak.
That works so well. That's why there is nobody addicted to heroin or cocaine or methamphetamine right. It's bad so therefore it doesn't exist.
Why would it be fewer more people are going to keep their guns regardless of some unconstitutional law. So overnight you'll probably make about 50 million more criminals.
The guns are already here.
No if the executive tries to ban all guns the supreme Court will come by the next day and slap his dumb ass. What you have to do in order to do this is overthrow the government and install a dictator.
Doesn't matter in the slightest this is in the UK.
Exactly they say criminals can use them against you. But you can't use them to defend yourself essentially taking away your right to self-defense. Unsubsequently every other right you have that's why in the UK we see other rights eroding they don't have free speech anymore or freedom of religion.
City Halls, legislatures, and the Capitol are public property.
The court in Helier gave its ok to restrictions.
Nope. They are secure areas. Like the capital building, whitehouse etc. not public property.
Nope. It specifically laid out what you can’t restrict. The McDonald, Caetano and Bruen rulings expanded on what you can’t restrict.
They are not private property. That was my point.
They said some restrictions could be ok without specifying.
Nobody ever has anything that isn't legal to own or poses.
Dump 50 million guns there and it'll be proven wrong
So it's not the magical laws it's that there aren't guns there. There are here.
I don't think it's hard I think it's impossible. And no the UK didn't do that.
That didn't even happen in Australia.
Through magic?
So maybe try finding a lamp with a genie in it.
There is no gun control debate. There is you lying and everybody else knowing that you are.
UK has all sorts of problems with contraband if there were more guns than people there they'd have problems with that too
www.pagepate.com
The streets are public property, except I assume in gated communities. But perhaps we are talking past one another. Can you define or give examples of public property?
So control clearly doesn't workI assume you mean "possess"
And many people own things that it is not legal for them to own or posses. And there are laws making this a felony:
"O.C.G.A. § 16-13-30 makes it illegal for a person to possess, purchase, or have under their control any controlled substance"
Georgia Drug Trafficking
Our criminal defense attorneys help fight drug charges in Georgia, including drug trafficking, possession with intent, and other drug offenses.
So you're suggesting there's a cultural difference between the US and UK. Yeah I think so too in the UK there's a culture of obedience it's not a case in the US. The US has a culture of rebellion that's why there's a US.
How? That didn't even work in Australia.
It wasn't an argument it was an example of how you make the US and the UK similar. And thus comparable.
No The forum isn't. The forum is a great representative of how there is no debate. You don't debate you just cram your fingers in your ears and scream lalalala.
Glad to see you can still admit when you're wrong
Gun control by restricting demand (ie: heavy penalties for illegal possession or use doesn't work)
Gun control be restricting supply (ie: a gun ban absolutely does work - as the UK and Japan prove).
That’s funny. Special pleading that doesn't even bother explaining itself. The only item not subject to how black markets work. We're supposed to believe that Japan and the UK are full of criminals desperately running around looking for non-existent guns.
I never thought gun control worked.Glad to see you can still admit when you're wrong
You can't restrict supply that's already here.
It started out that way.
What difference does that make and if you commit suicide by swallowing pills or shooting yourself but you're still dead.
And I'm betting most of those took place where there was strict gun control.
People didn't sell their guns to the government.
I don't know what you're trying to say here unless you're saying the US in the UK are exactly the same it doesn't mean anything
Sure but the people don't obey.
No it's that you can't formulate an argument. None of you anti rights people can. It's because you don't want to listen. You just want to grandstand and preach like yours talking to a religious congregation.