• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Former girlfriend says Clarence Thomas was a binge drinker, porn user

Not a witchhunt...you're confusing this with Christine O'Donnell. No, this is to right a wrong from 20 + years ago. If he had been a liberal, he would have been lynched, and "deep-fried", and we wouldn't even be discussing it. You know how zealous you guys on the right can be. LOL.

You got this turned around. It would be just the opposite.

Maybe it might be better if we elect a saint or a liberal to be in the supreme court the next time.
 
i am not calling you out, and i'm not going to start a stupid thread in the basement. and i did not complain, i merely voiced an opinion.



Am I the topic of this thread? Seriously, you should stop. If you want to whine about me, this is not the place for it.
 
Who did I name call? You were by your admission ignorant to what had transpired. How is that name calling? You turn a blind eye to the racist comments from Aaronsongs here and then you call me out?

Please, run along, perhaps you can find a thread on how mean and racist the tea party is.

Excuse me...but please identify any racist comments that I may have made so that I can summarily dismiss your charges.
 
Where did I "deny" anything. I said I had my reasons, reasons which came to fruition. furthermore, you once again showed your raging hypocricy. Now, before we all get yelled at, how about addressing the topic and stop swooning for the Greatness that is the Good Reverend.

rev.........i think thomas is a sleaze, always have. but not because he's a black conservative. and you DID bring up race first, whatever your reasons...and i did post to aaron about you not being a racist. but you surely are a troublemaker, especially lately.
 
Excuse me...but please identify any racist comments that I may have made so that I can summarily dismiss your charges.




Apparently, you said it all for me. LOL
But then again, my opinion of black conservatives is slightly lower than my opinion of conservatives in general.




For starters.
 
why? i know he brought up race before anyone else even thought about it. why would he do that? let me answer, it's what he does. he loves to do that bull****. and it is bull****. in fact, he should be infracted for baiting and flaming. rev won't discuss anything reasonably, nor will he ever admit he might be wrong. instead, he name calls. again, it's what he does best.

At the very least. I just got infracted and warned for alluded to the possibility that if someone said something foolish, then they would have removed all doubt of being cast as a fool. Not actually calling anyone a fool. But Hellhound can insult and race bait, apparently, with impunity.
 
rev.........i think thomas is a sleaze, always have. but not because he's a black conservative. and you DID bring up race first, whatever your reasons...and i did post to aaron about you not being a racist. but you surely are a troublemaker, especially lately.



What about aarons clear race baiting. No comment? Seriously. stop.
 
At the very least. I just got infracted and warned for alluded to the possibility that if someone said something foolish, then they would have removed all doubt of being cast as a fool. Not actually calling anyone a fool. But Hellhound can insult and race bait, apparently, with impunity.

you've been banned from this thread.....let it go before you're perma banned.
 
my comment was to aaron. and i made it. seriously, stop. you started it, rev.
 
why? i know he brought up race before anyone else even thought about it. why would he do that? let me answer, it's what he does. he loves to do that bull****. and it is bull****. in fact, he should be infracted for baiting and flaming. rev won't discuss anything reasonably, nor will he ever admit he might be wrong. instead, he name calls. again, it's what he does best.

Actually when talking about Arronsong he is and was absolutely correct. If you look at the entire thread, yes he did bring up the fact Clarence Thomas is black and not liberal. I can from personal experience with Arronsong, honestly say he was absolutely correct. So it, unlike Arronsong's statement saying anyone against Obama and his policy's are racist, was a valid point.
 
Last edited:
Actually when talking about Arronsong he is and was absolutely correct. If you look at the entire thread, yes he did bring up the fact Clarence Thomas is black and not liberal. I can from personal experience with Arronsong, he was absolutely correct. So it, unlike Arronsong's statement saying anyone against Obama as his policy's are racist. was a valid point.



exactly. As I stated in the thread, which she could have read.
 
Actually when talking about Arronsong he is and was absolutely correct. If you look at the entire thread, yes he did bring up the fact Clarence Thomas is black and not liberal. I can from personal experience with Arronsong, honestly say he was absolutely correct. So it, unlike Arronsong's statement saying anyone against Obama as his policy's are racist. was a valid point.

no. third post in, rev's post, before ANY mention of race.

Right, it's a witch hunt. To bad this black man ain't a liberal, eh?

rev baited.
 
no. third post in, rev's post, before ANY mention of race.



rev baited.

Not really. He is black and not liberal. In Arronsongs case, it is to bad as anyone who is black and not liberal is a UT. :lol:

OK bowing out of this one, and that was just a joke. I know he has extreme view, but I hope not that extreme.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom