Ford boycott threat over gay ads
From correspondents in Chicago
An influential US conservative Christian group has threatened to boycott Ford vehicles after the auto giant said it would resume advertising in gay publications.
The American Family Association, which claims more than three million supporters, said Ford had reneged on a deal to pull ads from the gay media.
"We had an agreement with Ford, worked out in good faith. Unfortunately, some Ford Motor Company officials made the decision to violate the good-faith agreement," AFA chairman Donald Wildmon said.
"We are now considering our response to the violation and expect to reach a decision very soon," the veteran Methodist minister said, adding "the option of a boycott is now very much alive".
The controversy has placed Ford in the midst of America's "culture war", caught between the powerful Christian right and the vocal gay lobby.
The AFA called for a boycott of Ford this year because of the company's "support for the homosexual agenda and homosexual marriage," but claimed a victory on December 1, saying "our concerns are being addressed."
Rumours of a "secret deal" between Ford and the AFA sparked an outcry from rights groups, prompting Ford to state on Wednesday that it would continue advertising in the gay press.
"It is clear there is a misperception about our intent," Ford said in a letter to seven rights group.
"As a result we have decided to run corporate ads in these targeted publications that will include not only Jaguar/Land Rover but all eight of Ford's vehicle brands."
Ford denied that any deal had been made and insisted that the decision to cease advertising its Jaguar and Land Rover brands in gay publications was part of a broad restructuring of advertising budgets at the luxury marques.
It also noted that its Volvo brand would continue to advertise in the gay press. But a number of rights organisations asked Ford to reaffirm its commitment to gay rights.
Company chairman Bill Ford did that on Monday with a statement that said the company values all people regardless of their racial, religious or sexual identity.
On Wednesday, Ford extended that commitment by stating it would continue to support non-profit groups and events in the gay and lesbian community.
However, Mr Wildmon insisted that AFA and Ford officials had hammered out an agreement that prompted the Christian group to call off its earlier boycott threat.
"All we wanted was for Ford to refrain from choosing sides in the cultural war, and supporting groups which promote same-sex marriage is not remaining neutral," he said.
The AFA, which Mr Wildmon founded in 1977 as the National Federation for Decency, recently made headlines by forcing US retailers to hang "Merry Christmas" signs instead of secular "Happy Holiday" messages.
It has claimed credit for successful boycotts of several national advertisers including Burger King and household products giant Clorox because they were "leading sponsors of TV sex, violence and profanity".
Ford did not immediately comment on the threat by the AFA.
The Human Rights Campaign, one of the gay and lesbian rights groups which received the letter from Ford, shrugged off the threat.
"We're not commenting on that. It's time to move on," Jay Smith Brown, communications director for HRC, said.
In a joint statement on Wednesday, 27 rights groups praised Ford's U-turn on gay ads as "an unequivocal reaffirmation of Ford's historic commitment to our community and the core American values of fairness and equality".
vergiss said:(from: http://theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,17586080%5E1702,00.html)
ARGH! What the hell is with "All we wanted was for Ford to refrain from choosing sides in the cultural war, and supporting groups which promote same-sex marriage is not remaining neutral"? That is bullcrap. So bullying them into chosing your side is making them neutral, eh?
What nasty, manipulative and un-Christian people.
Mikkel said:I agree. It's not like the gay community is calling for Ford to stop advertising in Christian publications. The intolerance here is clearly one sided, and I'm proud of Ford for not honoring such a despicable deal.
Stinger said:The gay community certainly called for advertisers to pull ads from Dr. Laura's show.
Stinger said:The gay community certainly called for advertisers to pull ads from Dr. Laura's show.
Mikkel said:That is true, but they've never made a statement like, "All we wanted was for Ford to refrain from choosing sides in the cultural war, and supporting groups which promote same-sex marriage is not remaining neutral" (except in reverse)
At least they're being open and honest about what side they're on.
Mikkel said:That is true, but they've never made a statement like, "All we wanted was for Ford to refrain from choosing sides in the cultural war, and supporting groups which promote same-sex marriage is not remaining neutral" (except in reverse)
At least they're being open and honest about what side they're on.
vauge said:The US is a capitalist nation. It doesn't matter what side you are on.
If they call for a boycott, that is their choice to make regardless of the intentions or honesty. If there are enough to shut them down, then lessons will be learned to keep politics out of the workplace. Again, regardless what side one is on.
Personally I do not buy Ford or Levis for the same reasons mentioned in the article. Along with the fact they are anti-gun.
vergiss said:You won't buy Ford or Levi's because they advertise to gays?
Did the gay groups (I won't say community, as I doubt the entire community supported it, or even noticed) threaten to aggressively boycott the advertisers and bully them into doing what they wanted?
Stinger said:It has nothing to do with what I will or won't do.
Absotlutely.
Stinger said:So it's OK for Gay groups to call for boycotts but not Christian groups.
vergiss said:You won't buy Ford or Levi's because they advertise to gays?
Did the gay groups (I won't say community, as I doubt the entire community supported it, or even noticed) threaten to aggressively boycott the advertisers and bully them into doing what they wanted?
Befuddled_Stoner said:Jesus Christ, do the gays themselves pay this much attention to who advertises in their magazines? Why are these ass clowns even perusing gay propaganda in the first place?
Stace said:So, what's next? The KKK is going to stage a boycott if Skoal advertises in Jet or Black Enterprise?
Mikkel said:Dr. Laura:
"A huge portion of the male homosexual populace is predatory on young boys."
"If you're gay or lesbian it's a biological error."
"I call homosexual practices deviant."
Now, if you can find something in gay publications calling Christianity 'deviant' or a 'theological error' or, (lol) 'predatory on young boys' (scratch that last one, because it probably was said and was probably justified), then I might think the American Family Association was justified in saying Ford was 'taking sides.' If not, I find the comparison incompatible.
aps said:EXCELLENT POINT. Dr. Laura thinks it's okay to criticize gay people? She should be ashamed of herself! *crossing fingers that either one of her children is gay or her husband (if she has one) dumps her butt because he's gay*
Mikkel said:Thanks. If the AFA successfully boycotts gay publications because they disagree with their politics, I think I might just start boycotting companies that advertise on FOX NEWS.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?