• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Florida sheriff warns protesters: ‘We will kill you graveyard dead’

Grizzly Adams

Grizzly Adams

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
13,094
Reaction score
4,717
Location
A mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Libertarian
The problem is that many, many people already think the police relish in the thought of abusing protestors. Stuff like this only gives credence to that view. There was a better way to get the point across. Something like "we don't want to hurt anyone, and if you protest peacefully and follow instructions, we will protect your right to do so. If you attack us, we will defend ourselves and you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law." What is so hard about that? Police should not openly fantasize about letting their dogs chew people up. That's not the kind of person you want in, let alone in charge of, a police force.
 
Grizzly Adams said:
CNN headline is obviously biased. The sheriff clearly refers to people throwing rocks or firebombs, or who point a firearm at an officer.

That's not a "protester." That’s a deadly threat from a violent rioter.


View attachment 67574519
Click to expand...
So, you're cool with cops declaring that they will be the judge, jury and executioner if they see someone throwing rocks. That's ... weird.
 
Grizzly Adams said:
You could watch the video to see what he actually said.

Or you could do this.
Click to expand...
I was trying to clarify your position. You started the thread.

You seem to be cool with cops declaring that they will be the judge, jury and executioner if they see someone throwing rocks. Is that true?
 
My question is: do you think this type of rhetoric is more likely to discourage violent protestors, or peaceful protestors?
 
Grizzly Adams said:
CNN headline is obviously biased. The sheriff clearly refers to people throwing rocks or firebombs, or who point a firearm at an officer.

That's not a "protester." That’s a deadly threat from a violent rioter.


View attachment 67574519
Click to expand...


Hehe... this is a methodology conversation again. ;)

I watched the video already today. He said what he said. I'm just not sure why he chose to say it that way. LE response should be consistent to where people know what they're getting themselves into without needing this kind of messaging. It sounds more like a provocation than a deterrent.

Then again, it is Florida... I think the cultural differences are great enough to where I'd have to have this explained to me before I come to any final conclusions.

Up here the guy would probably be fired. There would be little tolerance from either the left or the right for the police threatening to kill people ahead of a protest.

I've got no problems with police defending themselves. This just seems a little over the top. But, maybe folks things made a bit clearer in Florida, I dunno.. hehe
 
Because maga is all about respecting authority.......





.......unless they're standing in the way of their fuhrer. :rolleyes:
 
Grizzly Adams said:
CNN headline is obviously biased. The sheriff clearly refers to people throwing rocks or firebombs, or who point a firearm at an officer.

That's not a "protester." That’s a deadly threat from a violent rioter.


View attachment 67574519
Click to expand...

It helps to post a link to all that he said. He starts speaking about protestors at about the 5:50 mark in the following video:

 
EthanB said:
His name is Ivey, Wayne Ivey. /s
Click to expand...

I have the displeasure of having met that arrogant fat ****.

So called "constitutionalist" Sheriff who thinks he is the Emperor of his domain.
 
Grizzly Adams said:
CNN headline is obviously biased.
Click to expand...
Did the Sheriff say those words or not?
Grizzly Adams said:
The sheriff clearly refers to people throwing rocks or firebombs, or who point a firearm at an officer.
Click to expand...
Yes, he did.
Grizzly Adams said:
That's not a "protester." That’s a deadly threat from a violent rioter.
Click to expand...
The Sheriff did not specifically mention "riot" or "rioters", did he, if so I missed it?
Then again, I have no problem with anyone throwing a brick, firebomb, or pointing a weapon at officers having deadly force used against them.
But the Sheriff's words are an obvious escalation of rhetoric that quite possibly could incite folk to try what he will "kill you graveyard dead" over.
I hope his harsh rhetoric will not incite his officers to wound up trigger happy actions.
Grizzly Adams said:

View attachment 67574519
Click to expand...
"Big bellied Sheriff grabbed the gun and said 'why'd you do it'?" ;)
 
Cameron said:
The problem is that many, many people already think the police relish in the thought of abusing protestors. Stuff like this only gives credence to that view. There was a better way to get the point across. Something like ]we don't want to hurt anyone, and if you protest peacefully and follow instructions, we will protect your right to do so. If you attack us, we will defend ourselves and you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law." What is so hard about that? Police should not openly fantasize about letting their dogs chew people up. That's not the kind of person you want in, let alone in charge of, a police force.
Click to expand...

See the video link in post #18. He basically starts by saying that (bolded above).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom