- Joined
- Aug 10, 2019
- Messages
- 42,111
- Reaction score
- 8,700
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
And so the Non-Indians are not Americans in your mind?How about American?
That's what your idea would mean.
And so the Non-Indians are not Americans in your mind?How about American?
No it wouldn't?And so the Non-Indians are not Americans in your mind?
That's what your idea would mean.
You do not understand the topic.My step daughter has an full blooded American Indian boy friend....we don't refer him by anything but his name.
Indians and Eskimos and Inuit have something to do with America.Eskimo and Inuit have nothing to do with the term Indians.
Eskimo (/ˈɛskɪmoʊ/ ESS-kih-moh) or Eskimos are the indigenous circumpolar peoples who have traditionally inhabited the northern circumpolar region from eastern Siberia (Russia) to Alaska (United States), Northern Canada, Nunavik, Nunatsiavut, and Greenland.[1][2]
The two main peoples known as Eskimo are the Inuit (including the Alaskan Iñupiat, the Greenlandic Inuit, and the Inuit peoples of Canada) and the Yupik (or "Yuit") of eastern Siberia[3] and Alaska. A third northern group, the Aleut, are closely related to both. They share a relatively recent common ancestor and a language group, Eskimo-Aleut.
There exists a scholarly consensus that the word Eskimo etymologically derives from the Innu-aimun (Montagnais) word ayas̆kimew meaning "a person who laces a snowshoe" (an origin proposed by Ives Goddard at the Smithsonian Institution),[28] is related to husky (a breed of dog).[2][4][28][29] The word assime·w means "she laces a snowshoe" in Innu, and Innu language speakers refer to the neighbouring Mi'kmaq people using words that sound like eskimo.[30][31]
In 1978, José Mailhot, a Quebec anthropologist who speaks Innu-aimun (Montagnais), published a paper suggesting that Eskimo meant "people who speak a different language".[32][33] French traders who encountered the Innu (Montagnais) in the eastern areas adopted their word for the more western peoples and spelled it as Esquimau or Esquimaux in a transliteration.[34]
Supporters of the terms "Indian" and "American Indian" argue that they have been in use for such a long period of time that many people have become accustomed to them and no longer consider them exonyms. Both terms are still widely used today. "American Indian" appears often in treaties between the United States and the indigenous peoples with whom they have been negotiating since the colonial period, and many federal, state and local laws also use it.
Actually it pretty much is up to me if Eskimo is a slur since it is a word in English and in English it is not a slur.Actually, my Metis wife worked on a Dene dictionary when she lived in the Northwest Territories.
But the point that you don't seem to get is that It's not up to you or me or any Algonquin speaker to decide if the term is a slur. It's up to the Inuit.
"Eskimo" isn't English and the point of the wop illustration is that it's a slur because an Italian decided it is. Not because an Englishman decided it is. Get it?
My wife's Metis. Her mother was Mi'kmaq. It's one Native parent and one White. Her first husband was Native though so@ Indian, Métis, Inuit
![]()
Indian
The term Indian, when used to identify Indigenous peoples in South, Central and North America, is considered outdated and offensive. In Canada, the term has b...www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca
Now I will have to look up "Métis".![]()
It's not a word in English. And is it up to you if 'kike' is a slur? The term came from Jews at Ellis Island who couldn't write in English and didn't want to make an 'X' which is a Christian symbol so they made a circle, a 'kikel'.Actually it pretty much is up to me if Eskimo is a slur since it is a word in English and in English it is not a slur.
We are not talking about “kike” or “chink”My wife's Metis. Her mother was Mi'kmaq. It's one Native parent and one White. Her first husband was Native though so
It's not a word in English. And is it up to you if 'kike' is a slur? The term came from Jews at Ellis Island who couldn't write in English and didn't want to make an 'X' which is a Christian symbol so they made a circle, a 'kikel'.
Is it up to you if 'chink' is a slur?
I repeat, why is this a problem for you? They prefer to be called Inuit, would it offend you to call them Inuit? Would it represent capitulation to a leftist agenda? Go ahead, say it, "Inuit". That didn't hurt, did it? Didn't make you question your gender identity or want to take all their money away from billionaires, did it?
Why is it a problem for you to call a people by the term they prefer?
What's dumb is taking a Cree word for the Inuit people, applying it to other people all around the Arctic circle and thinking that makes the term legitimate. That's just dumb. If the Inuit don't like the term Eskimo and prefer to be xalled Inuit, there's no more room for discussion. Likewise the Yupik and Sami and whatever the Siberian natives prefer to be called.We are not talking about “kike” or “chink”
We are talking about Eskimo, which in English is not a slur.
I have no problem calling Inuits Inuits.
But Eskimo does not mean “Inuit” just like if you were to insist “Slavic” is a slur and then go “why can’t you just say Polish?! Is that so hard?”
To claim Eskimo is a slur, when it is not a slur and has no history as a slur, and is used as an overarching term much like “Germanic” includes Swedes, Danes, some Swiss, etc and Slavic includes Russians, Czechs, Serbs , Poles, etc and Latino include all kinds of different people, is simply dumb.
I don’t buy the story that the Algonquin used it as a slur, and even if Wendigo used it as a slur that has no bearing in its use in the English language.
русские do not call themselves “Russians” and Magyar do not call themselves Hungarians. What is your point?What's dumb is taking a Cree word for the Inuit people, applying it to other people all around the Arctic circle and thinking that makes the term legitimate. That's just dumb. If the Inuit don't like the term Eskimo and prefer to be xalled Inuit, there's no more room for discussion. Likewise the Yupik and Sami and whatever the Siberian natives prefer to be called.
Why would you insist on Eskimo if those people don't like to be called Eskimos? That's what matters here, not your or my understanding of the words.
Exactly! That's what I keep saying..... and Magyar do not call themselves Hungarians. What is your point?
A certain number of left wing eskimos who are activists poisoned by left wing social theory may not like it. Who cares?
What I think:A certain number of left wing eskimos who are activists poisoned by left wing social theory may not like it. Who cares?
The Native Americans I work, hang with just say Native. Works for meFirst Nation, Native Americans, Indians etc - which terms do you find acceptable?
If the Inuit don't like the term Eskimo and prefer to be xalled Inuit, there's no more room for discussion.
Who is on second. What’s on first.Who?
Who are the Hoohoos?
Or the Who-Whose?
I believe that’s 中华人民共和国@ China
According to some of the "logic" that I came across in this thread, it will soon be politically incorrect to call China "China", as the Chinese call their country differently.
So now let's all say " Zhōnghuá Rénmín Gònghéguó" instead of "China", so as to be polite and not racist.![]()
And what if I use the old Germanic runes?I believe that’s 中华人民共和国
If you use our oppressive Roman alphabet you are forwarding white supremacy