- Joined
- Jul 14, 2006
- Messages
- 1,390
- Reaction score
- 328
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Show me where they said that...
The point that American people are acting on hate and bigotry is very clear - not enoguh to make a gross generalization if one was being made, but take a look at the cluster**** that is SodaHead.com to see what I mean.
Which site are you referring to now?
No, 1.6 billion did not attack NYC city on 9/11. We all know that. Just as all Britons didn't bomb Dresden or all Japanese bomb Pearl Harbor. And the Americans are not patting themselves on the back for this, I am patting them on the back for this. I'm Canadian. But why shouldn't Americans feel proud of themselves. You're British and a BBC fan, right?? And why this talk of Christians? Are you deliberately muddying the waters or are you into moral equivalence? Have Christians been putting bombs on transportation systems in Europe? The idea is ludicrous and we should just stick to the facts.
Well it's pretty stupid to relate Christians to the Klan all right but we do know that many Muslims support terrorism, Sharia law and so on. The same cannot be said of Christians.
Poll: Most Say "Ground Zero Mosque" Is Inappropriate - Political Hotsheet - CBS News
Why shouldn't Americans be angry at Muslims for creating terror in the democracies and killing Innocent people everywhere? If it were Germans, Koreans, or Brazilians, wouldn't you get a little concerned? It seems you really bought into the innocent Muslim theory, despite your lack of evidence.
After 10 years of good will and the refusal to stereotype, Americans are starting to fight back at this very disrespectful act in NYC. And unless Muslims draw in, and don't overplay their hand, it will get worse. The soft approach has not worked in Europe and we're quite aware that it won't work here.
Poll reveals 40pc of Muslims want sharia law in UK - Telegraph
The center is not being built on ground zero. That's just a fact.
And your 71% number was for pissing them off and not a the lesser claim of thinking it was inappropriate. You can think it inappropriate, as wrong as that is, and not be pissed off.
And the British are a country. You can blame a country. You cannot blame all in a religion.
Britain bombed Dreseden.The Muslim faith did not commit the crime of 9/11. Al Qaeda did.
Like many, you mix up the order in your stereotyping. Brittian the country is the larger grouping, and individual members the smaller grouping,
Al Qaeda is the smaller grouping, and the Muslim religiion the larger grouping.
Now look at the foolishness with the center. Al Qaeda is the smaller group. Not only do not all Muslims agree with al Qaeda, but most are not even members of that smaller group, thus having no connection at all. Nothing like citizens of a country have. It is sheer ignorant to pretend the two examples are alike.
It is simply to close to where 3,000 people died at Muslims hands.
Wait, isn't that the TOTAL death toll on 9-11, INCLUDING The numbers who died in Flight 93, and Flight 77 which were nowhere near the twin towers?
If you are referring to the WTC as 'ground zero, that is true, but it is being built on a site that was damaged and rendered unusable after the attack. It is simply to close to where 3,000 people died at Muslims hands.
I bet a few of those dead were Muslim.
Some were...
But silly facts Winston, have no place in Grants World.
I bet a few of those dead were Muslim.
Some were...
But silly facts Winston, have no place in Grants World.
The point that American people are acting on hate and bigotry is very clear - not enoguh to make a gross generalization if one was being made....
Winston53660 said:I bet a few of those dead were Muslim.
Jetboogieman said:But silly facts Winston, have no place in Grants World.
Travelsonic said:Wait, isn't that the TOTAL death toll on 9-11, INCLUDING The numbers who died in Flight 93, and Flight 77 which were nowhere near the twin towers?
I don't believe that you actually believe that. First of all, there is no insurance "reward" - the company's obligation, under tort law, would be to put the insured back to where they were before the fire occurred. In other words, they'd get exactly the cost of the damage - no profit. So much for your stupid theory.
I bet a few of those dead were Muslim.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?