he isn’t calling all the shots. But told to take the fall. Maybe you are asking where all the money is going. Is that what you’re asking?your replay (specifically) Has aroused my curiosity.
i will be very grateful if you give me more explanation about your point of view
he isn’t calling all the shots. But told to take the fall. Maybe you are asking where all the money is going. Is that what you’re asking?
My thoughts exactly. The problems of the ME can only be solved by the people who live there. All forms of outside interference (military aid and interventions) should be done away with.
i need to ask you one very specifically question. Is he having built a Dutch designed seawall to keep out a 75’ tidal wave?yes iam asking about the money
and also the destination that he plan to take Egypt to
and your replay contain many Expressive expressions that make it difficult for me to understand
i need to ask you one very specifically question. Is he having built a Dutch designed seawall to keep out a 75’ tidal wave?
I've heard Indian people express a desire for reestablishing British organization of India as well. Those ships have long sailed, I would imagine. Islamic terror attacks against Europeans have occurred in Egypt since the Arab Spring, and sending representatives of Britain to 'organize' Egypt would be a logistical nightmare. Their safety would likely be in jeopardy.
Hi there
I live in Egypt (which is a country in the middle east)
& I think most of you heard about the “Arabian spring” .
The Arabian spring was just a single episode of a long bloody history of Arabian region.
The peoples of the Middle East have suffered during the past decades, and Anyone who looks at the history of that region can only find poverty, ignorance, wars and bloodshed.
====================
I was thinking to find a solution to this lasting tragedy,
And then I came with an idea :
Why are not European countries -(especially UK Which has a long history of colonization
)- Takes over managing and Governance the Middle East?
======================
I know the idea seems crazy, but Iam not talking about bloody Occupation ,
I am talking about (Governance ), where Europe can owe the Middle East and benefit from its resources, while at the same time , giving people the opportunity to live a decent life in the light of respect for human rights and multiculturalism.
========================
For example:
Suppose that : the Egyptian people & government are agreed to (Egypt's integration into the United Kingdom), where UK will owe the Egyptian lands, resources & Sovereignty.
And the UK will be committed To (Repayment of debts of Egypt/ providing :job opportunities , freedom of expression & decent life requirements to the Egyptian people)
========================
my question is :
Will UK find a good chance in this project?
Or UK will refuse to sink itself into the mud of middle east (where poverty ,Intolerance, Overpopulation) will make things getting worse , and finally :UK Will find itself fighting in a losing battle.
=====================
sorry for my silly talking , but iam eager to hear your opinion
Sisi is doing the best he can under and the circumstances inherited by him.ooooh GOD , please stop talking this way .
You scare me
your replay contain many mysterious symbols & expressions (like the coded messages between 2 spy agents)
what dutch seawall ?
do you mean that he prevents the refugees from escape to Europe through the sea .
anyway, its seems that i totally missed your point .
but i like your mysterious replays
thanks for your clarification about : the final solution
& you mentioned a good point (about what happen in palastine)
but i think time has changed , the European union can find a Consensual formula that provide the Arab nations with average life requirements , and this formula will respect Transparency and human rights.
Europe will get benefit to Solve the growing refugee problems.
Europe also will have an access to natural resources ,and use it in Industrial purposes To compete China
===========
i think its not about secular or religious .
the problem is more deeper than that
the problem relays in the Arabian government which lacks :honesty & discipline
and it doesnt matter wether you replace the current gov. with a new gov. , as the new gov. will be the same corrupt messy.
i think the problem is in Arab GENES
If we had remained neutral in WW2 we all might be speaking Gestapo German by now. If we had not stopped Saddam Hussein at Kuwait he might just have captured the oil reserves necessary for him to control the world through the oil spigot.
Variations of certain words are verboten to you progressives, no?I always am somewhat taken aback when someone refers to anything as a "final solution"
your replays were very useful to me
now i realize that my idea was Not practical & seemingly impossible .
But I began to notice another danger, which is "the west may support any type of dictator to have access to profitable natural resources or strategic geographical locations of middle east."
and this scenario is more logical & In line with the principle of (risk-reward ratio)
Hi there
I live in Egypt (which is a country in the middle east)
& I think most of you heard about the “Arabian spring” .
The Arabian spring was just a single episode of a long bloody history of Arabian region.
The peoples of the Middle East have suffered during the past decades, and Anyone who looks at the history of that region can only find poverty, ignorance, wars and bloodshed.
====================
I was thinking to find a solution to this lasting tragedy,
And then I came with an idea :
Why are not European countries -(especially UK Which has a long history of colonization
)- Takes over managing and Governance the Middle East?
======================
I know the idea seems crazy, but Iam not talking about bloody Occupation ,
I am talking about (Governance ), where Europe can owe the Middle East and benefit from its resources, while at the same time , giving people the opportunity to live a decent life in the light of respect for human rights and multiculturalism.
========================
For example:
Suppose that : the Egyptian people & government are agreed to (Egypt's integration into the United Kingdom), where UK will owe the Egyptian lands, resources & Sovereignty.
And the UK will be committed To (Repayment of debts of Egypt/ providing :job opportunities , freedom of expression & decent life requirements to the Egyptian people)
========================
my question is :
Will UK find a good chance in this project?
Or UK will refuse to sink itself into the mud of middle east (where poverty ,Intolerance, Overpopulation) will make things getting worse , and finally :UK Will find itself fighting in a losing battle.
=====================
sorry for my silly talking , but iam eager to hear your opinion
This came from a conversation in India mind you, not in Buttscratch, Fla.
I have previously written on this topic, Colonialism v. Immigration v. National Borders v. Compassion – What’s the Solution?The 1700's and the 1800's were the high-water marks for open immigration, and the expansion of European colonial empires. Motivated, entrepreneurial people left Europe and to a lesser extent Asia in droves for the New World countries of the U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand. As thinly populated (due to smallpox's effect on the native population) opened for settlement and trans-oceanic travel became routine the people came. The new worlds had little to offer other than land and opportunity. There were few objections because the migrations didn't cost much to the host countries. And they gained a source of cheap labor.Hi there
I live in Egypt (which is a country in the middle east)
& I think most of you heard about the “Arabian spring” .
The Arabian spring was just a single episode of a long bloody history of Arabian region.
The peoples of the Middle East have suffered during the past decades, and Anyone who looks at the history of that region can only find poverty, ignorance, wars and bloodshed.
*****************************
======================
I know the idea seems crazy, but Iam not talking about bloody Occupation ,
I am talking about (Governance ), where Europe can owe the Middle East and benefit from its resources, while at the same time , giving people the opportunity to live a decent life in the light of respect for human rights and multiculturalism.
========================
For example:
Suppose that : the Egyptian people & government are agreed to (Egypt's integration into the United Kingdom), where UK will owe the Egyptian lands, resources & Sovereignty.
And the UK will be committed To (Repayment of debts of Egypt/ providing :job opportunities , freedom of expression & decent life requirements to the Egyptian people)
=====================
sorry for my silly talking , but iam eager to hear your opinion
That is not an incentive to take over and rule and doing so would likely lead to animosity and mass discord.Hi there
I live in Egypt (which is a country in the middle east)
& I think most of you heard about the “Arabian spring” .
The Arabian spring was just a single episode of a long bloody history of Arabian region.
The peoples of the Middle East have suffered during the past decades, and Anyone who looks at the history of that region can only find poverty, ignorance, wars and bloodshed.
====================
I was thinking to find a solution to this lasting tragedy,
And then I came with an idea :
Why are not European countries -(especially UK Which has a long history of colonization
)- Takes over managing and Governance the Middle East?
======================
I know the idea seems crazy, but Iam not talking about bloody Occupation ,
I am talking about (Governance ), where Europe can owe the Middle East and benefit from its resources, while at the same time , giving people the opportunity to live a decent life in the light of respect for human rights and multiculturalism.
========================
For example:
Suppose that : the Egyptian people & government are agreed to (Egypt's integration into the United Kingdom), where UK will owe the Egyptian lands, resources & Sovereignty.
And the UK will be committed To (Repayment of debts of Egypt/ providing :job opportunities , freedom of expression & decent life requirements to the Egyptian people)
========================
my question is :
Will UK find a good chance in this project?
Or UK will refuse to sink itself into the mud of middle east (where poverty ,Intolerance, Overpopulation) will make things getting worse , and finally :UK Will find itself fighting in a losing battle.
=====================
sorry for my silly talking , but iam eager to hear your opinion
Variations of certain words are verboten to you progressives, no?
(And thoughts).
I don't think that a primitive culture without a civil society can solve much of anything beyond procreating.My thoughts exactly. The problems of the ME can only be solved by the people who live there. All forms of outside interference (military aid and interventions) should be done away with.
Do you not think the term "final solution" is associated with the holocaust? At least when out of scientific and similar technical realms
Hi there
I live in Egypt (which is a country in the middle east)
& I think most of you heard about the “Arabian spring” .
The Arabian spring was just a single episode of a long bloody history of Arabian region.
The peoples of the Middle East have suffered during the past decades, and Anyone who looks at the history of that region can only find poverty, ignorance, wars and bloodshed.
====================
I was thinking to find a solution to this lasting tragedy,
And then I came with an idea :
Why are not European countries -(especially UK Which has a long history of colonization
)- Takes over managing and Governance the Middle East?
======================
I know the idea seems crazy, but Iam not talking about bloody Occupation ,
I am talking about (Governance ), where Europe can owe the Middle East and benefit from its resources, while at the same time , giving people the opportunity to live a decent life in the light of respect for human rights and multiculturalism.
========================
For example:
Suppose that : the Egyptian people & government are agreed to (Egypt's integration into the United Kingdom), where UK will owe the Egyptian lands, resources & Sovereignty.
And the UK will be committed To (Repayment of debts of Egypt/ providing :job opportunities , freedom of expression & decent life requirements to the Egyptian people)
========================
my question is :
Will UK find a good chance in this project?
Or UK will refuse to sink itself into the mud of middle east (where poverty ,Intolerance, Overpopulation) will make things getting worse , and finally :UK Will find itself fighting in a losing battle.
=====================
sorry for my silly talking , but iam eager to hear your opinion
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?