yeah, I am sure most residents aren't assholes, looters, anarchists and other scum. and its usually innocent people who get hurt when the scum riot. The best thing that can happen is that the legitimate protestors can protest peacefully and the looters get 556 lobotomies or 9mm colonoscopies
Reverse Racism... those people are like a bunch of roaches. As soon as the light goes off, they're back. The cops may as well withdraw and let Ferguson become nothing but a bad memory. Burn the son of a bitch to the ground, roaches.
The fact is a police officer is in a no win situation in these types of cases......The left are ready to murder this police officer and they have not even heard his version how the incident went down. Talk about a kangaroo court.
Agreed. Most of the people, like anywhere really, are normal nice people that want to have a nice family and enjoy life. I don't know anything about Hogwash but he sounds like a racist.
maybe so maybe not. the fact is almost all of the crime being committed NOW in that area is perpetrated by black thugs.
I agree with that. The racist sounding part is that he describes residents of Ferguson as "people are like a bunch of roaches. As soon as the light goes off, they're back. " and that the answer is to, "Burn the son of a bitch to the ground, roaches." Actually... I am now confirming that he is a racist. FACT.
Here we go again. It seems that we will never be able to get away from playing the victim card. I could write pages and pages on why the black community can no longer legitimatly play the victim card but I will spare my fingers and my brain the effort. It's late and I am tired. All I will say is there has got to come a time where playing victim is no longer a legitimate defense to defending a violent culture.
You read it. I've had my fill.Read a book... that helps me.
Reverse Racism... those people are like a bunch of roaches. As soon as the light goes off, they're back. The cops may as well withdraw and let Ferguson become nothing but a bad memory. Burn the son of a bitch to the ground, roaches.
More than anything else it's about tribalism, an innate attribute of human behavior. It's about other things too but mostly tribalism.
From the known limited evidence, the shooting was justified.
Brown attacked an Officer while he was still in his vehicle and tried to take his gun. That is a life threatening situation.
The Officer received injuries to his face that required hospitalization from this attack.
Then as it escalated, Brown already having shown he was violent, progressed towards the Officer. The hearsay evidence puts that progression as a charge.
In such cases, of course use of his firearm is appropriate and justified.
We'll have to wait for more info and the cops story, but the wounds support a narrative of the cop trying to slow him down by shooting him in the arm and finally shooting him in the head after he kept coming. I think we can safely assume that the shot to the head would have dropped him so the shots to his arm were the first shots.
If Brown is found to have been guilty of threatening the cop's life, or some other transgression that led to a legitimate shooting...how can this be about any of the poll choices?
The rioting may be but not the actual event....we have no idea what the facts are yet.
Does it matter? You can always call her one when you can't otherwise make a cogent argument, you've demonstrated that ability.
What? If somebody shot me in the arm, I would run faster in the other direction. I would run towards the person shooting me.
He shoot him once in head but the police man thought the kid was still still moving, so he shoot him twice in head ...... and than he shoot 4 times just to be sure the kid won't move.From the known limited evidence, the shooting was justified.
Brown attacked an Officer while he was still in his vehicle and tried to take his gun. That is a life threatening situation.
The Officer received injuries to his face that required hospitalization from this attack.
Then as it escalated, Brown already having shown he was violent, progressed towards the Officer. The hearsay evidence puts that progression as a charge.
In such cases, of course use of his firearm is appropriate and justified.
He shoot him once in head but the police man thought the kid was still still moving, so he shoot him twice in head ...... and than he shoot 4 times just to be sure the kid won't move.
How in hell can it be "appropriate and justified."
Yeah that's BS.
My limited understanding of that drug makes me think it would have made him calm, thus less likely to get in a confrontation with police. Plus it stays in the system awhile, so saying "he had marijuana in his system" might mean he smoked it a few days or a week ago?
Basically a meaningless datum.
Cool av.Could you explain where you go this so called evidence?
Wasn't he unarmed? How could he have been threatening the cop's life???
Precisely. The amount of blind deference so many here are willing to give to the police is disturbing. Couple that with the war-like response of the department and it is even more disturbing.He shoot him once in head but the police man thought the kid was still still moving, so he shoot him twice in head ...... and than he shoot 4 times just to be sure the kid won't move.
How in hell can it be "appropriate and justified."
1.) Because what you cite isn't true.He shoot him once in head but the police man thought the kid was still still moving, so he shoot him twice in head ...... and than he shoot 4 times just to be sure the kid won't move.
How in hell can it be "appropriate and justified."
1.) Because what you cite isn't true.
2.) Because it was justified in accordance with the known evidence.
Learn the evidence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?