Fenton
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2012
- Messages
- 29,771
- Reaction score
- 12,231
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Re: Federal judge temporarily blocks new Wisconsin abortion law..................[W:4
It wasn't my analog...LOL.
It was by some distinct poster, an attempt to justify abortion with out limits using the second amendment as an analogy.
I'm not a fan of justifications by arbitrary comparisons as I think most possess the cognizant lattitude to consider the distinctions between 2 seperate issues no matter their Constitutional derivations.
Do you have a Morgan Gun ? Cause I have a 1983 F150 that needs to be put out of it's misery and I can't think of a better way to do that than turning it into swiss cheese on fire.
And you suppor tthem? And do you support them based on the same standard
YOU just put forth, which is that any form of limitation is okay as long as it comes short of stopping it from being possible?
Absolutely.
And I think you should be able to do the first one on private property, though believe it's within the states power to restrict it's access on public roads.
The RPG's issue is it falls into a grey area for me as I see the 2nd in terms of the notion of small arms, such as what an individual within a militia would own, rather than "artillery" such as canons and other such objects whose primary purposes is clearly for interstate warfare than personal defense. Still, if some private range wanted to offer up that experience I don't have a huge issue with it.
I'm also hardly a fan of the outright ban on owning a fully automatic weapon.
None of those things are actual good analogs however.
What you're suggesting is that the government should be able to force an individual to have to purchase and/or undertake an unnecessary private service for no legitimate government purpose NOR for any legitimate purpose relating to the original service being rendered.
So it would be akin to making individuals undertake a class where for an hour they're sat in a dark room and shown horrific images of gunshot wound victims while sounds of gunfire and screaming are occuring prior to being able to purchase any firearm...all for the purpose of making people really "think" about what they're purchasing.
It wasn't my analog...LOL.
It was by some distinct poster, an attempt to justify abortion with out limits using the second amendment as an analogy.
I'm not a fan of justifications by arbitrary comparisons as I think most possess the cognizant lattitude to consider the distinctions between 2 seperate issues no matter their Constitutional derivations.
Do you have a Morgan Gun ? Cause I have a 1983 F150 that needs to be put out of it's misery and I can't think of a better way to do that than turning it into swiss cheese on fire.