- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 66,852
- Reaction score
- 30,122
- Location
- Rolesville, NC
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
No military unit in their right mind would EVER AGAIN back the federal government over the Tenth Amendment....
Sorry but there are no riots happening and there is no civil disobedience here...
Is this the United States or is the the former USSR?
I know progressives want it to be the USSR but sorry to tell these progressives but a bunch of academics and politicians who theorize about what looks good on paper should really see their flaws in reality and in practice...
What are the feds going to do? arrest a governor? an entire legislative body for not adhering to their bull****?
How you think Russia became communist in the first place with Lenin and the Bolsheviks? yeah they said "**** off" - just like I'm saying **** off to them...
For some, Libertarian is just another name for nothing left to lose .
But is isn't.
Of course they can, and are.
It is invalid as of right now. The law has been ruled unconstitutional and until another ruling is made to overturn this current ruling, then the law is invalid.
They can what? They cannot simply void a marriage, no matter what this governor believes. They will see major lawsuits due to their own laws on voiding marriages and what the law says about this. Even the state laws (that I have already posted) say that there are certain circumstances only in which a marriage can be voided. Same sex marriage is not one of those.
1.)No military unit in their right mind would EVER AGAIN back the federal government over the Tenth Amendment....
Sorry but there are no riots happening and there is no civil disobedience here...
2.)Is this the United States or is the the former USSR?
3.)I know progressives want it to be the USSR but sorry to tell these progressives but a bunch of academics and politicians who theorize about what looks good on paper should really see their flaws in reality and in practice...
4.) What are the feds going to do? arrest a governor? an entire legislative body for not adhering to their bull****?
5.) How you think Russia became communist in the first place with Lenin and the Bolsheviks? yeah they said "**** off" - just like I'm saying **** off to them...
So you seem to think if the majority vote one way on something say llike to deny gay marriage that should be the way it is right?
Russia supports bigotry and discrimination we dont
No, that ruling has been stayed. The law is valid, legal, and enforceable as of right now.
I encourage them to sue before the 10th hears arguments.
Actually the US enforces bigotry and discrimination, in some cases.
The ruling has not been stayed, only the marriages themselves. The ruling was valid and invalidated the law.
It doesn't matter when the Circuit court takes the case. IF there marriages are being voided, then they have a valid case, no matter the results of the next court decision on this initial case.
Posse Commitatus Act prevents the military from working within the borders of the US, although the NG could technically still help. And most military units would not be really effective in this case anyway.
But there is plenty of law enforcement that would help as well. And there are plenty of supporters out there, along with those who simply do not care about this issue one way or another. The federal government has the power here, whether you approve or not.
And there are other ways to ensure enforcement of rulings, otherwise Texas would continue to try to prosecute sodomites.
Yes...
It's called direct democracy - you know - the same reason why progressives were crying when Gore lost the election. Progressives seemed to be a big fan then of the idea.
However, I'm not talking about national direct democracy I'm talking about state direct democracy - which exists for some issues - which is why voting propositions are on the ****ing ballot....
Prop 8 is a perfect example of the general public in a state voting and the feds or some ****ing bent group running to a judge and having all that "democracy ****" overturned because progressives are authoritarians.
Actually the US enforces bigotry and discrimination, in some cases.
So the marriages are not valid during that time.
The marriages are valid right now because they were valid at that time, when they were entered into.
1.)The feds have nothing and can do nothing....
2.)A governor with balls just needs to point that out....
3.) As far as civil armies that adore the federal government - progressives have none. Hell, they're afraid of guns for ****s sake. When the words have been said - all they know is run to the nearest rock and hide under it.
Ahhhh so the tyranny of the majority is fine on the state level. Seems awfully authoritarian to me.
The feds have nothing and can do nothing....
A governor with balls just needs to point that out....
As far as civil armies that adore the federal government - progressives have none. Hell, they're afraid of guns for ****s sake. When the words have been said - all they know is run to the nearest rock and hide under it.
1.)Do you know what the **** authoritarian means or in which context is should be used?
2.)Your posts are classic...
But you just said stayed.
The state does not recognize them because of the law.
Do you know what the **** authoritarian means or in which context is should be used?
Your posts are classic...
But you just said stayed.
The state does not recognize them because of the law.
No, the stay prevents any MORE marriages from happening, it does not invalidate ones that have already taken place.
Because those marriages are not legal during the stay, sure. Which means, the other ones are not either.
The feds have plenty and a lot of power, whether you agree or not.
Your issue is that you want to pidgeonhole groups into particular ways of thinking. "If you approve of/support same sex marriage, you are a progressive, and therefore are anti-gun, pro-Obama/Gore, etc.", no matter the truth that people are way more diverse in their beliefs/support than this and you are highly naive if you cannot recognize this.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?